Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05483348

Clinical Predictive Factors of Success of Hysteroscopic Endometrial Ablation/Resection

To determine the predictive factors of endometrial ablation failure in the management of uterine bleeding.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

This is a retrospective cohort study for women who have been treated with Thermal endometrial ablation due to uterine bleeding. The main purpose of this study is to demonstrate the possible risk factors associated with endometrial ablation failure causing patients to need subsequent gynecological procedures or undergoing hysterectomy for definitive treatment. Such efforts are made in order to anticipate the morbidity and mortality associated with patients in such conditions and to effectively stratify those patients to appropriate treatment techniques.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • All patients who had their endometrial ablation at Jordan University Hospital.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients whose index ablation or subsequent re-intervention could not be confirmed in detailed operative reports were excluded

Treatment and study plan

Endometrial ablation

Procedure

Thermal endometrial ablation

Repeated gynecological procedure

Procedure

subsequent gynecological procedures such as hysterectomy for any benign indication, D&C or repeat ablation.

Primary outcomes

  1. Clinical Predictive factors of successful endometrial ablation

    Time frame: from September 2016 through February 2022

    the outcome of hysteroscopic endometrial ablation whether it was a failure or a success; failure was defined as persistent of heavy bleeding after the ablation.

Secondary outcomes

  1. The failure rate of endometrial ablation for uterine bleeding

    Time frame: from September 2016 through February 2022

    To find the failure rate of endometrial ablation that is done for uterine bleeding

  2. Subsequent gynecological procedures after failed ablation

    Time frame: from September 2016 through February 2022

    To find the subsequent gynecological procedures that patients with unsuccessful ablation had

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Naser Al-Husban

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Clinical Predictive Factors of Success of Hysteroscopic Endometrial Ablation/Resection; Retrospective Study at a Tertiary University Hospital

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2022
First posted
Aug 2, 2022
Registry last updated
Aug 2, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.