Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University
Al Mansurah, Dakahliya, 35516, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT07265609
This study was designed to evaluate and compare the 2-year clinical performance of two different resin-matrix ceramic inlays
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–45 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Al Mansurah, Dakahliya, 35516, Egypt
The design of this prospective randomized controlled clinical trial was a split-mouth, two-arm, double-blinded clinical trial, with an allocation ratio of 1:1. The reporting of the trial followed the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) Statement. Twelve adult patients seeking dental treatments in the Conservative Dentistry Department outpatient clinic, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, were enrolled in the current study with a total of twenty-four compound inlay cavities. Each patient must sign a consent form before participating in the current study. The study was conducted from August 2023 to August 2025 as a part of the doctoral dissertation. Mansoura University's institution's ethics committee approved the form and protocol before conducting the study. The sample size was calculated using the G*Power statistical program. Based on an effect size of 0.4, a significance level of 5% (p < 0.05), and a statistical power of 80%, a minimum of 10 samples per group was required. To compensate for potential dropouts, the total sample size was increased to 12 patients, yielding a total of 24 restorations.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Inlay cavity preparations were performed, and RMC restorations were designed, milled, finished, and cemented on the assigned contralateral site according to the manufacturer's instructions. Each patient received one material on one side of the mouth and the other on the contralateral side. Side allocation was randomized.
Other names: Indirect restorations, partial-coverage restorations
Time frame: 2 years
Esthetic, functional and biological properties were assessed using World Dental Federation (FDI) criteria. Each criterion was rated on a five-point scale, where a score of 1 indicated clinically excellent or very good performance, score 2 indicated clinically good, score 3 indicated a clinically satisfactory, score 4 indicated clinically unsatisfactory, and score 5 indicated clinically poor performance requiring repair or replacement.
Time frame: 2 years
Each material was examined radiographically and radiographs were assessed and rated following World Dental Federation (FDI) five-point scale, where a score of 1 indicated clinically excellent or very good performance, score 2 indicated clinically good, score 3 indicated a clinically satisfactory, score 4 indicated clinically unsatisfactory, and score 5 indicated clinically poor performance requiring repair or replacement.
Time frame: 2 years
Periodontal responce and adjacent mucosa were assessed using World Dental Federation (FDI) criteria. Each criterion was rated on a five-point scale, where a score of 1 indicated clinically excellent or very good performance, score 2 indicated clinically good, score 3 indicated a clinically satisfactory, score 4 indicated clinically unsatisfactory, and score 5 indicated clinically poor performance requiring repair or replacement.
Mansoura University
Other
A Two-year Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Performance of a CAD/CAM Composite to a Polymer-infiltrated Ceramic Restorations
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07375706
Dental Restoration Failure
Istanbul, Fatih, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT05380973
Dental Restoration Failure
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT06603116
Dental Restoration Failure
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT06273410
Dental Restoration Failure
Alexandria, Egypt
View Trial Details