The HEARing CRC
Melbourne, Victoria, 3053, Australia
NCT Number: NCT06338670
This study aims to investigate the clinical performance of the Osia 3 Sound Processor in comparison to the Osia 2 Sound Processor in adults with mixed or conductive hearing loss or single-sided deafness implanted with an Osia implant. Participants will attend four study visits, where they will complete various hearing assessments using the Osia sound processors.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Melbourne, Victoria, 3053, Australia
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
OR Single-Sided Deafness in the implanted ear. Air Conduction threshold 4-frequency pure tone average (PTA4; mean of air conduction thresholds at 0.5, 1, 2 and 3 kHz) ≤ 20 dB HL in the good ear.
Exclusion criteria
Osia 3 Sound Processor including sound processor magnets and Osia 3 Aqua +
Osia® 2 Sound Processor and Osia 2 Aqua +
Time frame: During week 48-52
Speech perception in noise will be measured using the Australian Speech Test in Noise (AuSTIN), which is a test that uses Bamford-Kowal-Bench (BKB)-like target sentences presented in adaptive noise. The AuSTIN corpus comprises 80 lists of 20 sentences each, recorded in female voice. The goal of the adaptive Speech-in-Noise test is to obtain the Speech Reception Threshold in noise.
Time frame: During week 48-52
Aided thresholds in sound field will be measured using warble tones presented from a front speaker positioned at 1 m from the subject following the modified Hughson-Westlake procedure. Frequencies to be tested are 250, 500, 750, 1000, 1500, 2000, 3000, 4000, 6000 and 8000 Hz.
Time frame: During week 48-52
After listening to different sound clips with Osia 3 and the Osia 2 sound processors, the subjects will rate specific aspects of the sound, e.g., loudness or sound quality, on a Likert scale from 1 to 5 in steps of 1. A rating of 1 is least positive while a rating of 5 is most positive. They will also be asked to explain their sound quality experience in their own words per sound clip.
Time frame: During week 48-52
The investigator will hold a conversation with the participant in real-life situations while they wear the Osia 3 sound processor (sound processor only or combined with Osia 3 Aqua+) or Osia 2 sound processor. After the walk, the investigator will ask the participant to rate specific aspects of the sound they experienced on a Likert scale from 1 to 5.
Time frame: During week 48-52
Participants will be asked which device they prefer after having listened with both devices (Osia 2 and Osia 3) to different sound clips.
Cochlear
Industry
A Pre-market, Feasibility, Prospective, Open-label, Within Subject Investigation Evaluating the Clinical Performance of the Osia 3 Sound Processor Compared With the Osia 2 Sound Processor in Adult Osia Implant Recipients
Acronym: RECONNECT
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02019888
Cholesteatoma, Ear Diseases
Portland, Oregon, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01796236
Deafness, Ear Diseases
Toulouse, France
View Trial DetailsNCT07161154
Ear Diseases, Hearing Aid
View Trial DetailsNCT06634784
Children Under 5 Years, Ear Diseases
Hanover, Lower Saxony, Germany
View Trial Details