University of Aston
Birmingham, West Midlands, B4 7ET, United Kingdom
NCT Number: NCT01808209
Clinical Performance of Stenfilcon vs. Filcon II 3
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Birmingham, West Midlands, B4 7ET, United Kingdom
The objective of this study is to compare the comfort and clinical performance of Stenfilcon vs. Filcon II 3 compared to subject's habitual contact lenses. The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in the clinical performance between the two sets of lenses.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Subjects must satisfy the following conditions prior to inclusion in the study:
Exclusion criteria
Any of the following will render a subject ineligible for inclusion:
Participants wear a first pair of lenses for one week and then crossover and wear an alternate second pair of lenses for one week.
Other names: stenfilcon A (Daily Disposable Contact Lens)
Participants wear a first pair of lenses for one week and then crossover and wear an alternate second pair of lenses for one week.
Other names: filcon II 3 (Daily Disposable Contact Lens)
Time frame: Baseline
Participant rating of lens Daily and Comfortable Wearing Time. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses.(The hours of average comfortable wearing time and average daily wearing time.)
Time frame: 1 week
Participant rating of lens Daily and Comfortable Wearing Time. Collected at 1 week wear for each lens.(The hours of average comfortable wearing time and average daily wearing time.)
Time frame: 1 Week
Participant rating for lens handling. Collected at 1 week. (Insertion: 0-100, 0= could not get it in and 100= went in without a problem. Removal: 0= could not get it out and 100= came out without a problem. Blister: 0=impossible and 100=came out extremely easily).
Time frame: Baseline
Participant rating of lens comfort. Collected at baseline for habitual pair. (0-100; 0=very uncomfortable,100=extreme comfort / cannot feel them at all)
Time frame: 1 Week
Participant rating for comfort. Collected at 1 week. (0-100, 0= very uncomfortable and 100= extreme comfort/cannot feel them at all).
Time frame: Baseline
Participant rating of lens dryness. Collected at baseline for habitual pair. (0-100; 0=very uncomfortable, 100=extreme comfort/ cannot feel them at all)
Time frame: 1 Week
Participant rating for dryness. Collected at 1 week. (0-100, 0= very uncomfortable and 100= extreme comfort/cannot feel them at all).
Time frame: Baseline
Participant rating of vision quality. Collected at baseline for habitual lens. (0-100; 0=extremely poor vision totally blurred 100=excellent vision totally sharp)
Time frame: 1 Week
Participant rating of vision quality. Collected at 1 week. (0-100; 0=extremely poor vision totally blurred 100=excellent vision totally sharp)
Time frame: Baseline
Participant rating for eye whiteness. Collected at baseline for habitual lenses. (0-100, 0= total redness and 100= totally white).
Time frame: 1 Week
Participant rating for eye whiteness. Collected at baseline for habitual lenses. (0-100, 0= total redness and 100= totally white).
Time frame: Baseline
Participant rating for overall satisfaction. Collected at baseline for habitual lenses. (0-100, 0= extremely dissatisfied and 100= extremely satisfied).
Time frame: 1 Week
Participant rating for overall satisfaction. Collected at 1 week for study lenses. (0-100, 0= extremely dissatisfied and 100= extremely satisfied).
Time frame: Baseline
Assessment of Monocular (MHCVA) Right eye (OD), left eye (OS) and Binocular High Contrast Distance Visual Acuity (BHCVA). Collected at baseline for habitual lens. logMAR.
Time frame: Dispense
Assessment of Monocular (MHCVA) Right eye (OD), left eye (OS) and Binocular High Contrast Distance Visual Acuity (BHCVA). Collected at dispense for study lenses. logMAR.
Time frame: 1 Week
Assessment of Binocular High Contrast Distance Visual Acuity (BHCVA). Collected at 1 week for study lenses. logMAR
Time frame: 1 Week
Participant rating for surface wettability. Collected at 1 week. Tear film analysis in seconds.
Time frame: Baseline
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at baseline after removal of lenses. Percent of blood vessel coverage.
Time frame: 1 Week
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at 1 week after removal of lenses. Percentage of blood vessel coverage.
Time frame: Baseline
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at baseline after removal of lenses. Percentage of conjunctival redness.
Time frame: 1 Week
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at 1 week after removal of lenses. Percentage of conjunctival redness.
Time frame: Baseline
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at baseline after removal of lenses. (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, 0=none , 4=severe )
Time frame: 1 Week
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at 1 week after removal of lenses. (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, 0=none , 4=severe )
Time frame: 1 Week
Assessment of ocular health. Collected at 1 week after removal of lenses. (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, 0=none , 4=severe )
CooperVision, Inc.
Industry
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03334253
Eye Diseases, Myopia
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07087665
Eye Diseases, Myopia
Saint Louis Park, Minnesota, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06700460
Eye Diseases, Myopia
Omaha, Nebraska, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00320593
Eye Diseases, Myopia
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial Details