Faculty of Dentistry
Cairo, 11331, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT03283280
clinical performance of short fiber reinforced resin composite versus indirect nanohybrid resin composite onlay restorations in complex proximal cavities of molar teeth will be evaluated over one year.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me16 year–55 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Cairo, 11331, Egypt
Resin composite materials have been rapidly developed in the latest few years. Direct resin composite restorations become the golden standard for restoring intracoronal cavities. While for the extracoronal cavities, the indirect resin composite onlays tend to replace metallic restorations in most situations being more esthetic and conservative with lower cost (Rocca & Krejci, 2007).
Indirect resin composite onlays usually are lab processed in two appointments but it can be made in one appointment through CAD/CAM technology or by flexible model technique (semidirect technique).
These restorations offer more control on the proximal contacts and the anatomic form over the direct approach. Polymerization shrinkage occurs outside the patient mouth so the stresses are decreased and become limited to the width of the luting space. Annual failure rate (AFR) of indirect posterior resin composite restorations is up to 10% (Manhart et al, 2004).
One of the advancement in resin composite technology is the evolution of short fiber reinforced resin composite (SFRC) material that allows making a direct onlay restoration possible thus offers less procedural steps and saves more time (Garoushi et al, 2013).
This material is made to be used as a dentine substitute in the high stress-bearing areas. It is covered by a conventional resin composite filling to act as the enamel replacement this combination gives us a kind of biomimetic restoration.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Resin composite restoration can be made as a direct onlay
Other names: Short fiber reinforced resin composite
Time frame: Change from the Baseline at six months and 12 months.
Measured using modified USPHS criteria for clinical evaluation of restoration failure
Cairo University
Other
Clinical Performance of Short Fiber Reinforced Resin Composite Restorations Versus Indirect Nanohybrid Resin Composite Onlay Restorations in Complex Proximal Cavities of Molars
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06348953
Caries; Dentin, Deep Caries
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT06183320
Dental Restoration Failure of Marginal Integrity, Dentin Sensitivity
Nova Friburgo, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
View Trial DetailsNCT03924830
Dental Restoration Failure of Marginal Integrity, Dentin Sensitivity
Nova Friburgo, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
View Trial DetailsNCT06456619
Congenital Abnormalities, Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities
Ankara, Cankaya, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details