Hacettepe University
Ankara, 06100, Turkey (Türkiye)
NCT Number: NCT06192667
Purpose of research: Evaluation and comparison of 24-month clinical performance of injectable and conventional resin composites in class I cavities.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
18 year–35 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Ankara, 06100, Turkey (Türkiye)
The mechanical properties of conventional resin composites have been tried to be improved. In addition to the developed mechanical properties, the need for easy and fast application led to the development of flowable composites. Flowable composites have lower filler ratio than conventional hybrid composites so they are less rigid and have lower modulus of elasticity. For these reasons, the use of flowable composites in areas that may be exposed to high forces, especially occlusal cavities, is not recommended. Today, it is aimed to increase the wear resistance by increasing the amount of filler in flowable composites and producing injectable composites. A new product recently introduced to the market, a high-strength nano-filled injectable composite material, GC's G-ænial Universal Injectable(Tokyo,Japan), was also included in the study. This is a low-viscosity composite in which modifications have been made to provide a product with high wear resistance and depth of cure to make it suitable for posterior restorations.
One lesion in each patient will be randomly assigned to be restored using either the G-aenial Universal Injectable or Filtek Z250 resin composites. The adhesive, G2-BOND Universal will be used for adhesive procedures. The clinical procedure for the restorations will be performed by a single operator. The restorations will be evaluated by two calibrated examiners at baseline and at 6, 12, 18, 24 months in accordance with the modified USPHS criteria. Data will be statistically analyzed using the Chi-square and Cochran Q tests (p < 0.05).
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Highly filled composite resin
Conventional composite resin
Time frame: From baseline to 24 month
Observers evaluated the restorations was performed using the modified United State Public Health Service criteria regarding marginal adaptation. Marginal adaptation was evaluated by 2 independent clinicians. Visual inspection with a mirror was performed . Scores; Alfa: Closely adapted, no visible crevice. Bravo: Visible crevice, explorer will penetrate. Charlie: Crevice in which dentin is exposed
Time frame: From baseline to 24 month
Observers evaluated the restorations was performed using the modified United State Public Health Service criteria regarding marginal staining. Marginal staining was evaluated by 2 independent clinicians. Visual inspection with a mirror was performed . Scores: Alfa: No discoloration. Bravo: Discoloration without. Charlie: Discoloration with penetration in pulpal direction
Time frame: From baseline to 24 month
Observers evaluated the restorations was performed using the modified United State Public Health Service criteria regarding retention rate. Retention rate was evaluated by 2 independent clinicians. Scores: Alfa: No loss of restorative material. Charlie: Any loss of restorative material
Time frame: From baseline to 24 month
Observers evaluated the restorations was performed using the modified United State Public Health Service criteria regarding retention rate. Retention rate was evaluated by 2 independent clinicians. Scores: Alfa: Not present. Bravo: sensitive but diminishing in intensity. Charlie:constant sensitivity, not diminishing in intensity
Time frame: From baseline to 24 month
Observers evaluated the restorations was performed using the modified United State Public Health Service criteria regarding retention rate. Retention rate was evaluated by 2 independent clinicians. Scores: Alfa: No caries present. Charlie: Caries present
Hacettepe University
Other
24- Month Clinical Performance of Injectable and Conventional Resin Composites in Class I Cavities
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05756413
Caries,Dental, Dental Caries
Anamosa, Iowa, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06690229
Caries,Dental, Dental Caries
Aydin, Efeler, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06231823
Caries, Caries,Dental
Cairo, El-Willi, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07648212
Caries,Dental, Dental Caries
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
View Trial Details