Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
Al Mansurah, Aldakhlia, 35516, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT06137989
This study (a double-blinded, prospective, randomized clinical trial) aimed to evaluate 2-year clinical performance of dual- and light-cure bulk-fill resin composites in Class ӀӀ restorations.
The null hypothesis tested in this study was that, there would be no difference in the 2-year clinical performance of all tested bulk-fill resin composites in Class II restorations.
Forty patients were enrolled in the study. Each patient received three bulk-fill resin composites Class ӀӀ restorations. One dual-cure and two light-cure bulk-fill resin composites were used for Class ӀӀ restorations following manufacturer's instructions. A universal adhesive was used with all restorations. All restorations were clinically evaluated after 1 week (baseline), 6 months, 12 months, 18 months and finally after 24 months using the FDI World Dental Federation criteria.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me21 year–50 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Al Mansurah, Aldakhlia, 35516, Egypt
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
General exclusion criteria:
Specific exclusion criteria:
Bulk-fill technique
Bulk-fill technique
Bulk-fill technique
Time frame: From baseline to 2-year follow-up
Including five parameters (surface luster, margin staining, surface staining, color match & translucency, and esthetic anatomical form).
Each parameter is exhibited by five scores (1, 2, 3, 4, 5), score 1 is the best outcome.
Three scores for acceptable (1, 2, 3) and two scores for non-acceptable (4 for reparable and 5 for replacement).
Time frame: From baseline to 2-year follow-up
Including five parameters (marginal adaptation, occlusal wear, proximal contact, radiographic examination, and fracture of material & retention).
Each parameter is exhibited by five scores (1, 2, 3, 4, 5), score 1 is the best outcome.
Three scores for acceptable (1, 2, 3) and two scores for non-acceptable (4 for reparable and 5 for replacement).
Time frame: From baseline to 2-year follow-up
Including three parameters (post-operative sensitivity, recurrence of caries, and tooth integrity).
Each parameter is exhibited by five scores (1, 2, 3, 4, 5), score 1 is the best outcome.
Three scores for acceptable (1, 2, 3) and two scores for non-acceptable (4 for reparable and 5 for replacement).
Mansoura University
Other
Two-year Clinical Performance of Dual- and Light-cure Bulk-fill Resin Composites in Class ӀӀ Restorations: A Randomized Clinical Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03770286
Dental Caries, Dental Caries Class II
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06562868
Dental Caries Class II
Kayseri, Melikgazi, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06346756
Dental Caries, Dental Caries Class II
Konya, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06032689
Dental Caries Class II
Al Mansurah, Mansoura, Egypt
View Trial Details