Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03086135

Clinical Performance of a New Implant System for Bone Conduction Hearing

To study the initial experience with implanting and fitting the new Bone conduction system in patients with conductive, mixed or Single sided Sensorineural deafness.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

The Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult subjects (18 years or older)
  • Subject with conductive or mixed hearing loss in the ear to be implanted. Bone conduction thresholds with pure tone average (PTA4; mean of 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 kHz) of 55 dB HL.

OR Subject with single-sided sensorineural deafness who is a candidate for Baha surgery. Air conduction thresholds with a pure tone average PTA4 of 20 dB HL (mean of 0.5, 1, 2 and 3 kHz) in the good ear OR subject who is indicated for an AC CROS but-for some reason-cannot or will not use an AC CROS (Air Conduction-Contralateral Routing of Signal).

  • Signed informed consent
  • Previous experience from amplified sound though a non-surgical solution. (For example but not limited to Hearing aid, CROS device, Bone conductional hearing device on headband/ softband)

Exclusion criteria

  • Uncontrolled diabetes as judged by the investigator.
  • Condition that could jeopardise osseointegration and/or wound healing (e.g. osteoporosis, psoriasis, long-term systemic use of corticosteroids) or condition that may have an impact on the outcome of the investigation as judged by the investigator.
  • Insufficient bone quality and quantity for implantation of a BI300 Implant.
  • Subject that has received radiotherapy in the area of implantation, or is planned for such radiotherapy during the study period
  • Use of ototoxic drugs that could be harmful to the hearing, as judged by the investigator
  • Unable to follow investigational procedures, e.g. to complete quality of life scales.
  • Participation in another clinical investigation with pharmaceutical and/or device.

Treatment and study plan

Osia System

Device

An external Sound Processor captures and digitize the sound which is transferred to the internal implant where it is converted to an electrical signal. The electrical signal is further transferred as a vibration through an osseointegrated implant to the mastoid bone and eventually to the cochlea.

Primary outcomes

  1. Hearing Performance: Threshold Audiometry, Pure Tone Average of 4 Frequencies, PTA4, Unaided Versus OSIA System at 3 Months

    Time frame: Baseline before surgery, 3 months after surgery

    The change of hearing performance from the unaided hearing situation before surgery to the aided hearing situation with the OSIA system at 3 month, measured as free-field hearing test; Threshold audiometry PTA4 (mean of 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz) is presented. A Pure Tone Average (PTA) refers to the average of hearing threshold levels at a set of specified frequencies: typically 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz. This value gives a snapshot of an individual's hearing level. If PTA is <25 dB, the overall hearing would be considered to be within normal limits. With a PTA of 95 dB, the hearing would be considered in the profound range. The units reported for PTA4 are decibels (dB). The results presented here are the difference of PTA4 unaided and PTA4 aided with the Osia system. An uaided PTA4 values should be higher than a aided PTA4 if the hearing device is effective. A lower or more negative score is more desirable and reflects a better ability to hear softer sounds.

  2. Adaptive Speech Recognition in Noise, Unaided Versus OSIA System at 3 Months.

    Time frame: Baseline before surgery, 3 months after surgery

    The change of hearing performance from the unaided hearing situation before surgery to the aided hearing situation with the OSIA System at 3 months measured as free field hearing test Adaptive speech recognition in noise, is presented. Adaptive speech recognition in noise was measured as Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR). The noise was kept constant at 65 dB SPL and the speech was adapted in dB steps to establish the Speech-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) providing a 50% level of understanding. A ratio of 0 reflects the ability to correctly hear sentences at 65 dB, in the presence of 65 dB background noise. A negative SNR-value reflects the ability to correctly hear sentences below 65 dB, for example if 50% of the speech is received correctly at 55 dB the SNR value is -10. A positive SNR-value (Speech to Noise Ratio) reflects the ability to correctly hear sentences presented above 65 dB. A lower or more negative score is more desirable and reflects abetter hearing in a noisy enviroment.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Hearing Performance: Threshold Audiometry, Pure Tone Average, PTA4, Unaided Versus OSIA System at 4 Weeks, 6 and 12 Months

    Time frame: Baseline before surgery, 4 weeks, 6 and 12 months after surgery

    The change of hearing performance from the unaided hearinhg situation before surgery to the aided hearing situation with the OSIA system at 4 weeks, 6 and 12 months, measured as free-field hearing test: Threshold audiometry PTA4 (mean of 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz) is presented. A Pure Tone Average (PTA) refers to the average of hearing threshold levels at a set of specified frequencies: typically 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz. This value gives a snapshot of an individual's hearing level. If PTA is <25 dB, the overall hearing would be considered to be within normal limits. With a PTA of 95 dB, the hearing would be considered in the profound range. The units reported for PTA4 are decibels (dB). The results presented here are the difference of PTA4 unaided and PTA4 aided with the Osia system. An uaided PTA4 values should be higher than a aided PTA4 if the hearing device is effective. A lower or more negative score is more desirable and reflects a better ability to hear softer sounds.

  2. Hearing Performance: Threshold Audiometry Individual Frequences, Unaided Versus OSIA System at 4 Weeks, 3, 6 and 12 Months

    Time frame: Baseline before surgery, 4 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery.

    The change of hearing performance from the unaided hearing situation before surgery to the aided hearing situation with the OSIA system at 4 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months, measured as free-field hearing test: Threshold audiometry (0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0 and 8.0 kHz) is presented. This value gives a snapshot of an individual's hearing level. If PTA is <25 dB, the overall hearing would be considered to be within normal limits. With a PTA of 95 dB, the hearing would be considered in the profound range. The units reported for PTA4 are decibels (dB). The results presented here are the difference of the unaided hearing level expressed in dB and the hearing level aided with the Osia system at different time points. An unaided value should be higher than a aided if the hearing device is effective. A lower or more negative score is therefor more desirable and reflects a better ability to hear at the specified frequency.

  3. Speech in Quiet at 50, 65 and 80 dB SPL, Unaided Versus OSIA System at 4 Weeks, 3, 6 and 12 Months

    Time frame: Baseline before surgery, 4 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery.

    The change of hearing performance from the unaided hearing situation before surgery to the aided hearing situation with the OSIA System at 4 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months, measured as free-field hearing test Speech in quiet at 50, 65 and 80 dB SPL [% correctly perceived words at 50, 65 and 80 dB SPL] is presented. The change in percent points is presented. A positive value indicates an improved ability to perceive words in quiet at the specified decibel (dB) level a negative value represent an impairment.

  4. Adaptive Speech Recognition in Noise, Unaided Versus OSIA System at 4 Weeks, 6 and 12 Months

    Time frame: Baseline before surgery, 4 weeks, 6 and 12 months after surgery

    The change of hearing performance from the unaided hearing situation before surgery to the aided hearing situation with the OSIA System at 3 months measured as free field hearing test Adaptive speech recognition in noise, is presented. Adaptive speech recognition in noise was measured as Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR). The noise was kept constant at 65 dB SPL and the speech was adapted in dB steps to establish the Speech-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) providing a 50% level of understanding. A ratio of 0 reflects the ability to correctly hear sentences at 65 dB, in the presence of 65 dB background noise. A negative SNR-value reflects the ability to correctly hear sentences below 65 dB, for example if 50% of the speech is received correctly at 55 dB the SNR value is -10. A positive SNR-value (Speech to Noise Ratio) reflects the ability to correctly hear sentences presented above 65 dB. A lower or more negative score is more desirable and reflects a better hearing in a noisy environment.

  5. Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) at 3 and 12 Months

    Time frame: Baseline before surgery, 3 and 12 months after surgery

    The change of Ease of communication, Reverberation, Background noise, Aversiveness and a Global score from the unaided hearing situation before surgery to the aided hearing situation with the OSIA System at 3 and 12 months is presented. All subscales range from 0-100%, total score is the average of all subscales 0-100%, where 0% indicates no problem and 100% indicates always problem. The difference between the unaided and the aided situation is presented. In an ultimate case the unaided value could be 100 and the aided 0, the result is then 100. A positive value indicates an improvement, a negative value an impairment.

  6. Health Utility Index (HUI) at 3 and 12 Months

    Time frame: Baseline before surgery and 3 and 12 months after surgery

    The change of health status and health related quality of life from the unaided hearing situation before surgery to the aided hearing situation with the OSIA System at 3 and 12 months using the generic quality of life scale Health Utilities Index (HUI3) is presented. All subscales (comprehensive health state, vision, hearing, speech, ambulation, dexterity, emotion, pain, cognition) range from 0-1. A health utility value of 1.00 indicates perfect health while a score of 0.00 indicates death. The difference between the unaided and the aided situation is presented. In an ultimate case the unaided value could be 0 and the aided 1, the result is then 1.0. A positive value indicates an improved quality of life, a negative value indicates impaired quality of life.

  7. Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) at 3 and 12 Months

    Time frame: Baseline before surgery and 3 and 12 months after surgery

    The change of speech, spatial and hearing experiences from the unaided hearing situation before surgery to the aided hearing situation with the OSIA System at 3 and 12 months using the SSQ scale is presented. All subscales (speech, spatial, quality) range from 0 to 10, where 0 represents "can not hear at all", and 10 "hear perfectly". Total score is a average of the subscales. A positive value indicates improved hearing, a negative value indicates impaired hearing.

  8. Hearing Performance: Threshold Audiometry PTA4, With Reference Device BP110

    Time frame: Baseline before surgery, 4 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months.

    The change of hearing performance with the OSIA System at 4 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months compared to the pre-operative aided situation with BP110 on softband, measured as free-field hearing test; Threshold audiometry PTA4 (mean of 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz) is presented. The units reported for PTA4 are decibels (dB). A lower or more negative score is more desirable and reflects a better ability to hear softer sounds.

  9. Hearing Performance: Threshold Audiometry Individual Frequences With Reference Device BP110

    Time frame: Baseline before surgery, 4 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery.

    The change of hearing performance with the OSIA System at 4 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months compared to the pre-operative aided situation with BP110 on softband, measured as free-field hearing test; Threshold audiometry individual frequencies (0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 6.0 and 8.0 kHz) is presented. The units reported are decibels (dB). A lower or more negative score is more desirable and reflects a better ability to hear softer sounds.

  10. Speech in Quiet at 50, 65 and 80 dB SPL, With Reference Device BP110

    Time frame: Baseline before surgery, 4 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery.

    The change of hearing performance with the OSIA System at 4 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months compared to the pre-operative aided situation with BP110 on softband measured as free-field hearing test; Speech in quiet [% correctly perceived words at 50, 65 and 80 dB SPL]. The change in percent points is presented. A positive value indicates an improved ability to perceive words in quiet at the specified decibel (dB) level a negative value represent an impairment.

  11. Adaptive Speech Recognition in Noise, With Reference Device BP110

    Time frame: Baseline before surgery, 4 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery.

    The change of hearing performance with the OSIA System at 4 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months compared to the pre-operative aided situation with BP110 on softband;measured with free field hearing test Adaptive speech recognition in noise which was measured as signal to noise ratio (SNR). The noise was kept constant at 65 dB SPL and the speech was adapted in dB steps to establish the speech-to-noise ratio (SNR) providing a 50% level of understanding. A ratio of 0 reflects the ability to correctly hear sentences at 65 dB, in the presence of 65 dB background noise. A negative SNR-value reflects the ability to correctly hear sentences below 65 dB. A positive SNR-value reflects the ability to correctly hear sentences presented above 65 dB. A lower or more negative score is more desirable and represent a better hearing in a noisy environment.

  12. Surgical Information: Time of Surgery

    Time frame: Visit 2, surgery

    Surgery time in minutes between first incision and last suture

  13. Soft Tissue Thickness

    Time frame: Visit 2, surgery

    Surgical information: Soft tissue thickness was measured in mm

  14. Soft Tissue Reduction

    Time frame: Visit 2, surgery

    Surgical information: a question was asked if soft tissue reduction had been performed. Could be answered by ticking a box for "Yes" or "No".

  15. Bone Polishing/Removal at Implant Site

    Time frame: Visit 2, surgery

    Surgical information: a question is asked if bone polishing/removal at Implant site has been performed. Yes or No can be ticked.

  16. Type of Anaesthesia

    Time frame: Visit 2, surgery

    Surgical information: a question is asked which type of anaesthesia has been used: local or general can be ticked.

  17. Location of BI300 Implant

    Time frame: Visit 2, surgery

    Surgical information: where is the location of the BI300 implant, measured in two different ways:

    Alternative 1 used for the first 6 subjects: Location from the ear channel in mm.

    Alternative 2 used for the rest of the population 45 subjects, after an amendment: measured in mm horizontally and vertically from ear channel. and the distance in mm between the receiver and the coil.

    Value 9.64 mm vertically from ear channel is correct.

  18. Incision Type

    Time frame: Visit 2, surgery

    Surgical information: a question was asked regarding what type of incision had been used; C-shaped flap, posterior based flap or other could be ticked.

  19. Daily Usage Time of Sound Processor

    Time frame: 6 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months

    Sound processor usage time measured as hours per day.

  20. Comfort

    Time frame: 6 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months

    Comfort of sound processor measured with a visual analogue scale where 0% is defined as no comfort at all and 100% as most comfortable imaginable, i.e. minimum 0, maximum 100.

  21. Magnet Choice

    Time frame: 4, 6 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months

    Available magnet strengths: 1/2, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 or 6, where 1/2 is the weakest and 6 the strongest.

  22. Softpad Use

    Time frame: 6 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months

    A question was asked if the subjects used softpads; yes or no could be ticked.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Cochlear

Industry

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2019
First posted
Mar 22, 2017
Registry last updated
Oct 14, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.