Mohammed Elsawy
Shibīn al Kawm, 2266166, Egypt
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT07522671
This randomized controlled clinical trial evaluates the clinical performance of 3D-printed resin restorations compared with milled monolithic zirconia in implant-supported single crowns and short-span fixed partial dentures (FPDs). A total of patients requiring one or two implant-supported restorations in the mandibular anterior region were randomly allocated to receive either 3D-printed permanent resin restorations (CROWNTEC) or conventionally milled zirconia prostheses.
All restorations were fabricated using a standardized digital workflow and assessed over a 12-month follow-up period. The primary outcome was restoration survival rate, while secondary outcomes included technical complications, peri-implant biological parameters, marginal bone level changes, and patient-reported satisfaction.
This study aims to provide clinical evidence regarding the viability of 3D-printed definitive resin materials as an alternative to zirconia in implant prosthodontics.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–60 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Shibīn al Kawm, 2266166, Egypt
Location status: Recruiting
This study was designed as a parallel-arm randomized controlled clinical trial to compare the clinical performance of implant-supported restorations fabricated using a novel 3D-printed resin material (CROWNTEC) with that of conventionally milled monolithic zirconia. The investigation focused on single crowns and short-span fixed partial dentures (FPDs) in the mandibular anterior region, where functional and esthetic demands are critical.
Participants meeting predefined inclusion criteria were randomly assigned into two intervention groups: a 3D-printed resin group and a zirconia group. All restorations were produced using a fully digital workflow, including intraoral scanning, CAD design, and standardized manufacturing protocols. Prostheses were delivered as either screw-retained or cement-retained restorations, with careful control of occlusion and prosthetic design parameters.
Patients were followed at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months, with extended follow-up planned up to 24 months. The primary outcome measure was restoration survival, defined as the absence of failure requiring replacement. Secondary outcomes included technical complications such as fracture, chipping, and screw loosening; biological parameters including plaque index, bleeding on probing, and probing depth; and radiographic assessment of marginal bone level changes. Patient-reported outcomes were also evaluated using a visual analog scale to assess satisfaction with esthetics, comfort, and masticatory function.
By directly comparing a novel additive manufacturing material with an established reference standard, this study addresses a critical gap in the literature regarding the clinical applicability of 3D-printed definitive restorations in implant dentistry. The findings are expected to contribute valuable evidence on the performance, limitations, and potential role of 3D-printed resin materials in modern prosthodontic practice.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Implant-supported single crowns or short-span fixed partial dentures fabricated using 3D-printed permanent resin (CROWNTEC). Restorations are produced using a standardized digital workflow, including intraoral scanning, CAD design, 3D printing at 50 µm layer thickness, post-processing (isopropyl alcohol cleaning, post-curing), finishing, and polishing. Restorations are delivered as screw- or cement-retained prostheses. In addition, Other participants will receive implant-supported single crowns or short-span fixed partial dentures fabricated from monolithic zirconia using CAD-CAM milling. Restorations undergo sintering, finishing, and polishing, and are delive
Other names: Milled Zirconia Restorations
Time frame: 12 months
The proportion of implant-supported single crowns and short-span fixed partial dentures that remain functional without fracture, loss, or need for replacement over the follow-up period. Survival is defined as the restoration remaining in situ, fully functional, and free of catastrophic failure requiring intervention.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Menoufia University
Other
Clinical Performance of 3D-Printed Resin Versus Milled Monolithic Zirconia in Implant-Supported Single Crowns and Short-Span Fixed Partial Dentures: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06357143
Fractures, Bone, Prosthesis User
Málaga, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT05548322
Aging, Amputation
Marseille, France
View Trial DetailsNCT06471855
Lower Limb Amputation, Prosthesis User
Pavia, PV, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT06937242
Amputation, Amputation; Traumatic, Leg: Thigh, Between Hip and Knee
Austin, Texas, United States
View Trial Details