Senofilcon A
Devicesoft contact lens, 2-week replacement indicated
NCT Number: NCT00975585
The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical performance of two contact lenses.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–45 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
North Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
soft contact lens, 2-week replacement indicated
soft contact lens with a 4-week replacement indicated.
Time frame: 2 weeks
The overall score is the average of the total scores of each of five regions of the cornea. The minimum average score is 0 and the maximum average score is 3. Corneal surface abnormality as indicated by the severity of staining over five regions of the cornea (central, superior, inferior, nasal and temporal) was assessed by the investigator using the following scale: 0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=severe.
Time frame: 2 weeks
Visual acuity was assessed by the investigator using the Snellen chart and converted to the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR). logMAR ideal is 0.0 and represents 20/20 Snellen visual acuity. logMAR values > 0.00 indicate vision poorer than the ideal and values <0.00 indicate vision greater than the ideal.
Time frame: 2 weeks
After two weeks of wear, subjects responded to a phone survey question regarding overall comfort of the study contact lenses (senofilcon A and lotrafilcon B) using the following scale: 5=excellent, 4=very good, 3=good, 2=fair, 1=poor.
Time frame: 2 weeks and 4 weeks
After four weeks of wear, subjects responded to a phone survey question regarding overall comfort of the study contact lenses (lotrafilcon B)using the following scale: 5=excellent, 4=very good, 3=good, 2=fair, 1=poor.
Time frame: 2 weeks
The investigator assessed limbal redness using the following scale: 0=None, 1=Trace, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, 4=Severe
Time frame: 2 weeks
The investigator assessed bulbar redness using the following scale: 0=None, 1=Trace, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, 4=Severe
Time frame: 2 weeks
Subjects responded to a phone survey question regarding the frequency of the sensation of dryness while wearing the study contact lenses using the following scale: 1=Extreme, 2=Moderate, 3=Slight, 4=None
Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.
Industry
Clinical Evaluation of Two Silicone Hydrogel Frequent Replacement Contact Lenses
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03334253
Eye Diseases, Myopia
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07087665
Eye Diseases, Myopia
Saint Louis Park, Minnesota, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06700460
Eye Diseases, Myopia
Omaha, Nebraska, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00320593
Eye Diseases, Myopia
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial Details