Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03947944

Clinical Outcomes of Small-incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) Using Vector Planning Method.

In the past two decades, the femtosecond laser (FSL) technology has been introduced in the corneal refractive surgery filed, and brought a remarkable innovation. It can make tissue dissection through photodisruption and plasma cavitation. Initially, the FSL was used predominantly to make a corneal flap when performing laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), which is followed by stromal ablation using excimer laser. A new surgical technique called femtosecond lenticule extraction (FLEx) has been developed that uses only FSL to dissect two interfaces to create refractive lenticule and then remove it, which is very similar with LASIK. Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) which is the advanced form of all-in-one FSL refractive technique does not make a corneal flap rather make small incision where the separated refractive lenticule is removed through, and the upper part of the corneal tissue is called cap. Since the clinical outcomes of SMILE were firstly published in 2011, SMILE has been widely used for correction of myopia or myopic astigmatism worldwide. SMILE provides excellent visual outcomes and has advantages including a lesser decrease in corneal sensitivity and absence of flap related complications compared to LASIK.

The vector planning method is newly developed astigmatism correction method, which combines refraction astigmatism in 60 % emphasis and corneal astigmatism in 40 % emphasis. The vectorial difference between corneal astigmatism and refractive cylinder at the corneal plane is ocular residual astigmatism (ORA). In normal eyes treated for myopic astigmatism, the ORA typically ranges from 0.73 to 0.81 D. The eyes with high ORA resulted in inferior clinical outcomes after corneal refractive surgery including LASIK, LASEK, and SMILE. The vector planning method was effective in LASIK according to previous study. Therefore we try to confirm the efficacy of vector planning method in SMILE.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Myopic Astigmatism Astigmatism Eye Diseases Refractive Errors

Age range

20 year–45 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Department of Ophthalmology, Yonsei Univeristy College of Medicine

Seoul, 03722, South Korea

About this study

Enrollment period : 6 months after IRB approval Participants : The subjects over 20 years old, who visited Severance hospital and Eyereum eye clinic for SMILE surgery with myopic astigmatism. The participants who satisfies criteria, and who can be monitored at all times during each period of observation after surgery are included in the study.

Methods: The subjects are randomly divided into two groups. One group underwent SMILE surgery using manifest refraction based planning, and the other group underwent SMILE surgery using vector planning. Before surgery, all patients underwent a detailed ophthalmological examination that included evaluation of logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) uncorrected-distance visual acuity (UDVA) and CDVA, manifest refraction, slit-lamp examination (Haag-Streit, Köniz, Switzerland), keratometry, and Scheimpflug-based corneal topography (Pentacam HR, Oculus). Dynamic corneal response (DCR) parameters were examined using Corvis ST. Corneal wavefront aberrations were measured using Keratron Scout (Optikon 2000, Rome, Italy). All examinations were repeated at 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • 1. Age of 20 years or older.
  • 2. Myopia
  • 3. Who is willing to get SMILE surgery

Exclusion criteria

  • 1. Severe ocular surface disease
  • 2. Any corneal disease, cataract, glaucoma, macular disease, or previous history of intraocular or corneal surgery
  • 3. Patients with suspicion of keratoconus on corneal topography

Treatment and study plan

SMILE using manifest refraction planning

Procedure

The treatments of astigmatism were planned using either the manifest refraction (manifest refraction group) or the vector planning method (vector planning group). The surgery was performed with standardized techniques with triple centration technique using the 500-KHz VisuMax system (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany). The superior cap depth was set as 120 µm, and the length of the side cut was set to 2 mm. Once the anterior (upper) and posterior (lower) planes of the lenticule were defined, the anterior and posterior interfaces were dissected using a microspatula with a blunt circular tip and extracted with microforceps. The integrity of the lenticule was assessed subsequently. The treatment plan for the vector planning group involved a combination of refractive astigmatism with 60 % emphasis and corneal astigmatism with 40 % emphasis.

SMILE using vector planning

Procedure

The treatments of astigmatism were planned using either the manifest refraction (manifest refraction group) or the vector planning method (vector planning group). The surgery was performed with standardized techniques with triple centration technique using the 500-KHz VisuMax system (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany). The superior cap depth was set as 120 µm, and the length of the side cut was set to 2 mm. Once the anterior (upper) and posterior (lower) planes of the lenticule were defined, the anterior and posterior interfaces were dissected using a microspatula with a blunt circular tip and extracted with microforceps. The integrity of the lenticule was assessed subsequently. The treatment plan for the vector planning group involved a combination of refractive astigmatism with 60 % emphasis and corneal astigmatism with 40 % emphasis.

Primary outcomes

  1. Uncorrected Distance Vision Acuity at each time point between the two groups.

    Time frame: preoperative

    Uncorrected Distance Vision Acuity in logMAR scale will be compared between the two groups at each time point.

  2. Uncorrected Distance Vision Acuity at each time point between the two groups.

    Time frame: postoperative 6 months

    Uncorrected Distance Vision Acuity in logMAR scale will be compared between the two groups at each time point.

  3. Corrected Distance vision Acuity at each time point between the two groups.

    Time frame: preoperative

    Corrected Distance Vision Acuity in logMAR scale will be compared between the two groups at each time point.

  4. Corrected Distance vision Acuity at each time point between the two groups.

    Time frame: postoperative 6 months

    Corrected Distance Vision Acuity in logMAR scale will be compared between the two groups at each time point.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Total higher order aberration at each time point between the two groups.

    Time frame: preoperative

    Total higher order aberrations, spherical aberrations, and coma aberrations are examined using Keratron Scout (Optikon 2000, Rome, Italy). The unit of those is "μm".

    • Total higher order aberrations at each time point and change from baseline at each time point will be compared between the two groups.

  2. Total higher order aberration at each time point between the two groups.

    Time frame: postoperative 1 month

    Total higher order aberrations, spherical aberrations, and coma aberrations are examined using Keratron Scout (Optikon 2000, Rome, Italy). The unit of those is "μm".

    • Total higher order aberrations at each time point and change from baseline at each time point will be compared between the two groups.

  3. Total higher order aberration at each time point between the two groups.

    Time frame: 3 months

    Total higher order aberrations, spherical aberrations, and coma aberrations are examined using Keratron Scout (Optikon 2000, Rome, Italy). The unit of those is "μm".

    • Total higher order aberrations at each time point and change from baseline at each time point will be compared between the two groups.

  4. Total higher order aberration at each time point between the two groups.

    Time frame: 6 months

    Total higher order aberrations, spherical aberrations, and coma aberrations are examined using Keratron Scout (Optikon 2000, Rome, Italy). The unit of those is "μm".

    • Total higher order aberrations at each time point and change from baseline at each time point will be compared between the two groups.

  5. Total higher order aberration changes from baseline at each postoperative time point between the two groups.

    Time frame: preoperative

    Total higher order aberrations, spherical aberrations, and coma aberrations are examined using Keratron Scout (Optikon 2000, Rome, Italy). The unit of those is "μm".

    • Total higher order aberrations at each time point and change from baseline at each time point will be compared between the two groups.

  6. Total higher order aberration changes from baseline at each postoperative time point between the two groups.

    Time frame: postoperative 1 month

    Total higher order aberrations, spherical aberrations, and coma aberrations are examined using Keratron Scout (Optikon 2000, Rome, Italy). The unit of those is "μm".

    • Total higher order aberrations at each time point and change from baseline at each time point will be compared between the two groups.

  7. Total higher order aberration changes from baseline at each postoperative time point between the two groups.

    Time frame: 3 months

    Total higher order aberrations, spherical aberrations, and coma aberrations are examined using Keratron Scout (Optikon 2000, Rome, Italy). The unit of those is "μm".

    • Total higher order aberrations at each time point and change from baseline at each time point will be compared between the two groups.

  8. Total higher order aberration changes from baseline at each postoperative time point between the two groups.

    Time frame: 6 months

    Total higher order aberrations, spherical aberrations, and coma aberrations are examined using Keratron Scout (Optikon 2000, Rome, Italy). The unit of those is "μm".

    • Total higher order aberrations at each time point and change from baseline at each time point will be compared between the two groups.

  9. Spherical aberration at each time point between the two groups.

    Time frame: preoperative

    • Spherical aberrations at each time point and change from baseline at each time point will be compared between the two groups.

  10. Spherical aberration at each time point between the two groups.

    Time frame: postoperative 1 month

    • Spherical aberrations at each time point and change from baseline at each time point will be compared between the two groups.

  11. Spherical aberration at each time point between the two groups.

    Time frame: 3 months

    • Spherical aberrations at each time point and change from baseline at each time point will be compared between the two groups.

  12. Spherical aberration at each time point between the two groups.

    Time frame: 6 months

    • Spherical aberrations at each time point and change from baseline at each time point will be compared between the two groups.

  13. Spherical aberration changes from baseline at each postoperative time point between the two groups.

    Time frame: preoperative

    • Spherical aberrations at each time point and change from baseline at each time point will be compared between the two groups.

  14. Spherical aberration changes from baseline at each postoperative time point between the two groups.

    Time frame: postoperative 1 month

    • Spherical aberrations at each time point and change from baseline at each time point will be compared between the two groups.

  15. Spherical aberration changes from baseline at each postoperative time point between the two groups.

    Time frame: 3 months

    • Spherical aberrations at each time point and change from baseline at each time point will be compared between the two groups.

  16. Spherical aberration changes from baseline at each postoperative time point between the two groups.

    Time frame: 6 months

    • Spherical aberrations at each time point and change from baseline at each time point will be compared between the two groups.

  17. Coma aberration at each time point between the two groups.

    Time frame: preoperative

    • Coma aberrations at each time point and change from baseline at each time point will be compared between the two groups.

  18. Coma aberration at each time point between the two groups.

    Time frame: postoperative 1 month

    • Coma aberrations at each time point and change from baseline at each time point will be compared between the two groups.

  19. Coma aberration at each time point between the two groups.

    Time frame: 3 months

    • Coma aberrations at each time point and change from baseline at each time point will be compared between the two groups.

  20. Coma aberration at each time point between the two groups.

    Time frame: 6 months

    • Coma aberrations at each time point and change from baseline at each time point will be compared between the two groups.

  21. Coma aberration changes from baseline at each postoperative time point between the two groups.

    Time frame: preoperative

    • Coma aberrations at each time point and change from baseline at each time point will be compared between the two groups.

  22. Coma aberration changes from baseline at each postoperative time point between the two groups.

    Time frame: postoperative 1 month

    • Coma aberrations at each time point and change from baseline at each time point will be compared between the two groups.

  23. Coma aberration changes from baseline at each postoperative time point between the two groups.

    Time frame: 3 months

    • Coma aberrations at each time point and change from baseline at each time point will be compared between the two groups.

  24. Coma aberration changes from baseline at each postoperative time point between the two groups.

    Time frame: 6 months

    • Coma aberrations at each time point and change from baseline at each time point will be compared between the two groups.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Yonsei University

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2019
First posted
May 13, 2019
Registry last updated
May 13, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.