The HEARing CRC
Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Australia
NCT Number: NCT02746172
The aim of this research is to investigate the potential use of specific metrics in assessing the quality and optimising an individual's cochlear implant fitting. Assessment of the sensitivity and specificity of specific metrics that are potential predictors of inaccurate T-levels and C-levels is important to determining best methods for streamlined high quality fitting, providing the potential for feedback to the individual and clinic, as well as automated adjustments for optimisation. Ultimately the objective is to increase clinical capacity for managing both the installed base and new candidates for cochlear implantation.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Australia
Optimising the clinical fitting of a cochlear implant to an individual listener is an important aspect of post-operative clinical care. The level of success experienced by any individual with a cochlear implant can be influenced, to a significant extent, by the quality of the clinical programming by the audiologist. During clinical programming the audiologist typically measures the amount of electrical charge required to elicit first hearing (the T-level) and to provide a loud but comfortable percept (the C-level) on each of the 22 electrodes. The amount of electrical stimulation required for a threshold and a comfortably loud percept varies across the electrodes of the array and also across individual users. Appropriately set lower and upper electrical stimulation levels are vital for ensuring that the listener is able to detect reasonably soft sounds whilst loud sounds are perceived as loud while remaining comfortable. Achieving this result across the relevant frequency range is a prime aim of programming.
There are a number of challenges in achieving optimal fitting of cochlear implant recipients in the clinical setting. First, there are varying skill levels and experience level of health professionals and allied workers involved in programming devices for cochlear implant recipients, often resulting in variability in the quality of the program (or MAP) provided to an individual. Second, there are varying levels of access to specialized equipment such as sound booths which are required for some types of audiometric measures to be reliably obtained. Finally, there are increasing demands on clinical capacity, with the specialized centres typically treating recipients having limited resources and ability to effectively manage the rapidly increasing population.
As a result, there is an increased need for effective, quality-controlled but streamlined management of implanted recipients.
The aim of the current study is to investigate the potential use of specific metrics in assessing the quality and optimizing an individual's cochlear implant fitting. Assessment of the sensitivity and specificity of specific metrics that are potential predictors of inaccurate T-levels and C-levels is important to determining best methods for streamlined high quality fitting, as well as automated adjustments for optimizing. One of the key objectives is to integrate a new technological advance in the form of in-situ audiometry, which removes the need for a sound booth to conduct audibility checks of the program. Other planned investigations relate to identifying the metrics which best identify maps that are not optimized, and to development and assessment of a range of techniques which may be able to be effectively applied in the clinical setting.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: Testing over 12 weeks
Time frame: Testing over 12 weeks
Time frame: Testing over 12 weeks
Time frame: Testing over 12 weeks
Time frame: Testing over 6 weeks
This will be compared to the test-retest reliability of free-field aided audiometry which is within a margin of 10 dB HL.
The Hearing Cooperative Research Centre
Other
Clinical Metrics for Assessing Audibility, Comfort and Performance of Cochlear Implant Recipient MAPs
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05219474
Ear Diseases, Hearing Disorders
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01805167
Ear Diseases, Hearing Disorders
Nice, France
View Trial DetailsNCT05070429
Aging, Ear Diseases
Hagerstown, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07501312
Ear Diseases, Hearing Disorders
Aurora, Illinois, United States
View Trial Details