Dynamic Hip Screw with HA-coating (Hiploc)
DeviceDuring surgery for pertrochanteric hip fracture a lag screw with hydroxyapatite coating on the screw thread was used to fix the fracture
NCT Number: NCT05677061
Evaluated whether HA coated dynamic hip screws can improve fixation of the screw in trochanteric femoral fractures
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me50 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Randomised study to determine the effect of HA coating on the stability of dynamic Hip screws used to stabilize femoral neck fractures. Stability of the screw will be determined by RSA measurements. Additionally the fracture stability will be evaluated by RSA measurements.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
During surgery for pertrochanteric hip fracture a lag screw with hydroxyapatite coating on the screw thread was used to fix the fracture
During surgery for pertrochanteric hip fracture a lag screw with no coating on the screw thread was used to fix the fracture
Time frame: 6 months PO
Lag screw migration measured as y-translation (mm) with respect to the femoral head/neck fracture segment using marker-based radiostereometry (ModelBased RSA vs 4.2 or newer) until 6 months follow-up
Time frame: 6 months PO
Lag screw migration measured as translations in mm along the three orthogonal axes (x and z) and rotations in degrees about the three orthogonal axes (x, y and z) in addition to the summed translations (total translation) and summed rotations (total rotation) with respect to the femoral head/neck fracture segment using marker-based radiostereometry (ModelBased RSA vs 4.2 or newer) until 6 months follow-up
Time frame: 6 months PO
Lag screw migration measured as rotations in degrees about the three orthogonal axes (x, y and z) in addition to the summed summed rotations (total rotation) with respect to the femoral head/neck fracture segment using marker-based radiostereometry (ModelBased RSA vs 4.2 or newer) until 6 months follow-up
Time frame: 6 months
TAD AP+LAT, fracture reposition AP+LAT (mm)
Time frame: 6 months PO
Change in Harris Hip Score (HHS) measured as a scale from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) from pre-operative til 6 months postoperative
Time frame: Preoperative
New Mobility Score measured on a scale from 0 (no mobility function) to 9 (full independent mobility function) preoperative
Time frame: 6 months
Leg Length difference in cm at 6 months follow-up indicate fracture impaction
Time frame: 6 months
Timed Up and Go Test (TUG) at 6 months follow-up (a score less than 20 seconds indicate mobility independence)
University of Aarhus
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05197335
Femoral Fractures, Fractures, Bone
Acquaviva delle Fonti, BA, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT07159945
CONUT Score, Femoral Fractures
Fuzhou, Fujian, China
View Trial DetailsNCT05094791
Femoral Fractures, Fractures, Bone
Greenville, South Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03182751
Femoral Fractures, Fractures, Bone
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
View Trial Details