New Living CHF
DevicePEA CRT optimization
NCT Number: NCT00658203
The aim of the study is to compare clinical benefits of the cardiac resynchronisation (CRT) achieved by the PEA optimised pacing configuration and a CRT optimised by standard clinical procedure.
PEA optimised configuration (PEA-CRT) is obtained, during patient's follow-up, using the Peak Endocardial Acceleration sensor features onboard the device.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
CH Albi, Albi, France
The study is a prospective, multicentre, controlled and randomised clinical investigation, with two single-blinded arms.
The objective of the study is to compare the clinical benefits of Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy (CRT) optimised by automatic PEA sensor features (PEA-CRT), with those obtained by standard optimisation procedure (STD-CRT).
The patient candidate for inclusion in the study has a severe chronic Heart Failure, indicated for the implantation of a Biventricular pacing system according to updated ESC guidelines (2005).
All patients included in the study will be followed-up for 1 year; patient's follow-ups are scheduled during hospitalisation, at one month, 3 months, 6 months and one year after implantation.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
The patient candidate for inclusion in the study must be indicated for implantation of a Biventricular pacing system, with the following clinical conditions:
Exclusion criteria
Any patient who has one of the following characteristics will be excluded from the study:
PEA CRT optimization
Time frame: 12 months
Time frame: 12 months
Time frame: 12 months
Time frame: 12 months
Time frame: 12 months
Time frame: 12 months
Time frame: 12 months
Time frame: 12 months
Time frame: 12 months
Time frame: 12 months
Time frame: 12 months
Time frame: 12 months
Time frame: 12 months
Time frame: 12 months
Time frame: 12 months
Time frame: 12 months
Time frame: 12 months
Time frame: 12 months
Time frame: 12 months
Time frame: 12 months
Time frame: 12 months
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
LivaNova
Industry
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT01648634
Cardiomyopathies, Cardiomyopathy
Paris, France
View Trial DetailsNCT01261065
Cardiomyopathies, Cardiomyopathy
Houston, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02543281
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Bundle-Branch Block
Portland, Oregon, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02077010
Cardiomyopathies, Cardiomyopathy
Kansas City, Kansas, United States
View Trial Details