Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02771145

Clinical Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of FID 120947A

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of FID 120947A in soft contact lens wearers of Japanese ethnicity.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Refractive Error Eye Diseases Refractive Errors

Age range

20 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Contact Alcon Japan, Ltd. for Trial Locations

Tokyo, 105-6333, Japan

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Successful history of silicone hydrogel or other soft contact lens wear (except for daily disposable lenses) in both eyes during the past 3 months and history of at least 5 consecutive days of successful DAILY wear in both eyes at Visit 1;
  • Best spectacle corrected distance visual acuity greater than or equal to 0.8 (decimal visual acuity) in each eye;
  • Other protocol-specified inclusion criteria may apply.

Exclusion criteria

  • Any ocular or systemic medical condition that may, in the opinion of the Investigator, preclude safe administration of the investigational products or affect the results of this study;
  • Need to wear contact lenses on an extended wear basis (ie, overnight) during the study;
  • Monocular (only 1 eye with functional vision) or fit with only 1 lens;
  • Use of a daily cleaner and/or enzyme cleaner to care for lenses at least 7 days prior to Visit 1 (use of lens rewetting drops is acceptable);
  • History of intolerance or hypersensitivity to any component of the investigational products;
  • Unwilling or unable to abstain from use of all over-the-counter (OTC) or prescribed topical ocular medications (except for rewetting drops) within 7 days prior to Visit 1 and for the duration of the study;
  • Moderate (grade 3) or severe (grade 4) corneal edema, corneal staining, injection (limbal hyperemia, bulbar conjunctival hyperemia), tarsal abnormalities, or "other" findings;
  • Corneal vascularization that is mild (grade 2) or higher;
  • Conjunctival or structural lid abnormalities or abnormal corneal opacities at Visit 1;
  • Current or history of ocular infection, severe inflammation or disease within 6 months prior to Visit 1;
  • Any systemic disease (including allergies, respiratory infections or colds) that may affect the eye or be exacerbated by use of contact lenses or contact lens solutions;
  • Use of systemic medications that may contribute to adverse ocular effects unless on a stable dosing regimen for a minimum of 30 days prior to Visit 1;
  • Ocular or intra-ocular surgery and/or ocular trauma within the last 12 months (excluding placement of punctal plugs);
  • Participation in any investigational clinical study within 30 days of Visit 1;
  • Other protocol-specified exclusion criteria may apply.

Treatment and study plan

FID 120947A contact lens disinfecting solution

Device

Investigational 3% hydrogen peroxide solution that uses a platinum catalyst for neutralization and is intended for simultaneous cleaning, protein removal, disinfecting and storage of silicone hydrogel and soft contact lenses

Other names: Clear Care® Plus

Soft contact lenses (SCL)

Device

Commercially available soft contact lenses worn a minimum of 8 hours each day on a daily wear basis for the duration of the study (180 days). A fresh pair will be dispensed on Day 0, Day 30, Day 60, and Day 135.

Other names: 2-Week Acuvue®

SCL preservative solution

Device

Commercially available solution for rinsing soft contact lenses

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Eyes With Visibly Clean Lenses at Each Visit

    Time frame: Day 7, Day 30, Day 60, Day 90, Day 135, Day 180

    Worn study lenses were removed and evaluated for deposits. Deposits found on the lenses were defined using a 3-part classification system consisting of general visibility, the specific appearance and area covered. A lens was considered visibly clean if it had nondetectable films or deposits. Both eyes contributed to the analysis.

  2. Number of Eyes With Film Deposits on Lens by Type at Each Visit

    Time frame: Day 7, Day 30, Day 60, Day 90, Day 135, Day 180

    Worn study lenses were removed and evaluated for deposits. Deposits found on the lenses were defined using a 3-part classification system consisting of general visibility, the specific appearance and area covered. Both eyes contributed to the analysis.

  3. Number of Eyes With Crystalline Deposits on Lens by Type at Each Visit

    Time frame: Day 7, Day 30, Day 60, Day 90, Day 135, Day 180

    Worn study lenses were removed and evaluated for deposits. Deposits found on the lenses were defined using a 3-part classification system consisting of general visibility, the specific appearance and area covered. Both eyes contributed to the analysis.

  4. Percentage of Lens Area Covered by Film Deposits at Each Visit

    Time frame: Day 7, Day 30, Day 60, Day 90, Day 135, Day 180

    Worn study lenses were removed and evaluated for deposits. Deposits found on the lenses were defined using a 3-part classification system consisting of general visibility, the specific appearance and area covered. For each visit, the number analyzed represents the number of eyes with film deposits on lens, respectively.

  5. Percentage of Lens Area Covered by Crystalline Deposits at Each Visit

    Time frame: Day 7, Day 30, Day 60, Day 90, Day 135, Day 180

    Worn study lenses were removed and evaluated for deposits. Deposits found on the lenses were defined using a 3-part classification system consisting of general visibility, the specific appearance and area covered. For each visit, the number analyzed represents the number of eyes with film deposits on lens, respectively.

  6. Percentage of Eyes With Change From Baseline in Contact Lens-Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (CLCDVA) by Line Change at Each Visit

    Time frame: Day 7, Day 30, Day 60, Day 90, Day 135, Day 180

    Distance VA was assessed for each eye individually while reading a chart distant to the participant in dimmed room illumination. VA was measured using Decimal acuity, where 1.0 (equivalent to 20/20) is considered normal distance-eyesight. A line increase indicates an improvement in VA. Both eyes contributed to the analysis

  7. Average Lens Wear Time (Averaged Over the Last 3 Days) at Each Visit

    Time frame: Day 0, Day 7, Day 30, Day 60, Day 90, Day 135, Day 180

    Subject recorded a response to the question, "Averaging over the last 3 days, how many hours per day did you wear your contact lenses?" Lens wear time was summarized as an estimate of the subject's daily wear, averaged over the course of 3 days prior to each scheduled visit, and measured in hours. Habitual lenses were used at the Day 0 time point.

  8. Lens Wear Time at Each Visit Day

    Time frame: Day 0, Day 7, Day 30, Day 60, Day 90, Day 135, Day 180

    Subject recorded a response to the question, "How many hours have you worn your contact lenses today?" Lens wear was measured in hours. Habitual lenses were used at the Day 0 time point.

  9. Average Rewetting Drop Frequency at Each Visit

    Time frame: Day 0, Day 7, Day 30, Day 60, Day 90, Day 135, Day 180

    Subject recorded a response to the question, "Averaging over the last 3 days, how many times per day did you use rewetting drops?" Habitual lenses were used at the Day 0 time point.

  10. Number of Unscheduled Lens Replacements by Reason

    Time frame: Up to Day 180

    Subjects were dispensed enough contact lenses to follow a 2-week replacement schedule during the study. Lenses replaced at other times were considered unscheduled. The counts in the table represent the total number of unscheduled lenses replaced by reason for any eye, any subject. All lenses which were replaced are counted. Habitual lenses were used at the Day 0 time point.

  11. Likert Item - "When I Use This Solution, my Lenses Are Comfortable All Day."

    Time frame: Day 0, Day 7, Day 30, Day 60, Day 90, Day 135, Day 180

    Lens comfort was assessed by the subject as a single response on a 5-point Likert scale (Strongly Agree, Agree, Undecided, Disagree, Strongly Disagree) to best describe their lens wearing experience over the last 3 days. Responses were summarized by agreement category and presented as percentage of subjects. Habitual lenses and habitual lens care solution were used at the Day 0 time point.

  12. Likert Item - "When I Use This Solution, at the End of the Lens Wearing Day my Vision is Clear."

    Time frame: Day 0, Day 7, Day 30, Day 60, Day 90, Day 135, Day 180

    Clear vision was assessed by the subject as a single response on a 5-point Likert scale (Strongly Agree, Agree, Undecided, Disagree, Strongly Disagree) to best describe their lens wearing experience over the last 3 days. Responses were summarized by agreement category and presented as percentage of subjects. Habitual lenses and habitual lens care solution were used at the Day 0 time point.

  13. Likert Item - "When I Use This Solution, I Like the Way This Product Feels During Handling."

    Time frame: Day 0, Day 7, Day 30, Day 60, Day 90, Day 135, Day 180

    Product handling was assessed by the subject as a single response on a 5-point Likert scale (Strongly Agree, Agree, Undecided, Disagree, Strongly Disagree) to best describe their lens wearing experience over the last 3 days. Responses were summarized by agreement category and presented as percentage of subjects. Habitual lenses and habitual lens care solution were used at the Day 0 time point.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Alcon Research

Industry

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2016
Primary completion
2017
Study completion
2017
First posted
May 12, 2016
Registry last updated
Jan 10, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.