Faculty of Dentistry-Mansoura University
Al Mansurah, Dakahliya, 35516, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT05125900
This study was designed to evaluate and compare the 3-year periodontal responses and clinical performance of proximal subgingival open sandwich restorations using three different glass ionomer-based restorative materials and flowable composite.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me21 year–50 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Al Mansurah, Dakahliya, 35516, Egypt
The description of the experimental design followed the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement. The present study was a double-blinded (patients and examiner) randomized clinical trial anticipating the parallel design. Ninety-five adult patients seeking dental treatment in the Operative Department clinic at the Faculty of Dentistry, University of Mansoura were enrolled in the current study with a total of 120 Class II restorations. No advertisement was made for participant recruitment, forming a sample of convenience. Each patient must signs a consent form before participating in the current study. The study was conducted from January 2020 to January 2023 as a part of the Doctoral dissertation. Mansoura University institution's ethics committee approved the form and protocol before conducting the study. The sample size was calculated based on the clinical success rate (100% success rate at 2 years) of posterior class II restorations restored with open sandwich and deep margin elevation techniques observed in previous studies. According to several parameters including a significance level of 5%, the power of the test was calculated to be 80%, and equivalent limit of 15%. Upon these data, a sample size of 120 subjects was appropriate to allow for a 20% drop-out.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Each patient randomly received deep proximal margin elevation with one of the tested restorative materials, while the overlying restorations were all the same regular bulk fill resin composite
Time frame: 3 years after restoration
The periodontal situation of patients were examined based on bleeding on probing, plaque index and probing depth scores
Time frame: 3 years after restoration
Percentage of aesthetic, functional and biological properties were clinically assessed using World Dental Federation parameters for each base material group
Time frame: 3 years after restoration
Each base material/gingival dentin interface was examined radiographically each 6 months period.
Mansoura University
Other
Clinical Evaluation of Subgingival Open Sandwich Restorations: 3-year Results of a Randomized Double-blind Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06348953
Caries; Dentin, Deep Caries
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT06183320
Dental Restoration Failure of Marginal Integrity, Dentin Sensitivity
Nova Friburgo, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
View Trial DetailsNCT03924830
Dental Restoration Failure of Marginal Integrity, Dentin Sensitivity
Nova Friburgo, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
View Trial DetailsNCT06456619
Congenital Abnormalities, Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities
Ankara, Cankaya, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details