Preheated everX Posterior composite
OtherApplication of everX Posterior composite after preheating to 54°C using a composite warmer, followed by placement, adaptation, and curing according to manufacturer guidelines.
NCT Number: NCT07496047
To clinically evaluate the performance of preheated versus non-preheated short fiber-reinforced composite (SFRC) restorations in Class I posterior cavities over a 12-month period
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me25 year–40 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Restorative Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt
Resin-based composites are widely used for posterior restorations due to their aesthetic properties and adhesive capabilities. However, polymerization shrinkage stress and insufficient fracture resistance remain major concerns in stress-bearing areas.
Short fiber-reinforced composites (SFRCs) were developed to improve mechanical properties and crack-stopping ability. everX Posterior (GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) contains randomly oriented E-glass fibers within a resin matrix, enhancing fracture toughness and load-bearing capacity.
Preheating composite materials has been proposed to reduce viscosity, improve flow, enhance cavity adaptation, and potentially increase the degree of conversion. Elevated temperature reduces internal friction among monomers, thereby improving polymerization kinetics. Despite promising laboratory findings, limited clinical evidence exists regarding the impact of preheating on SFRC performance.
Therefore, this randomized clinical trial aimed to evaluate the clinical behavior of SFRC restorations placed with and without preheating in Class I cavities over 12 months
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Application of everX Posterior composite after preheating to 54°C using a composite warmer, followed by placement, adaptation, and curing according to manufacturer guidelines.
Application of everX Posterior composite at room temperature, placed and cured according to manufacturer instructions.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months
Assessment of the marginal integrity of restorations using FDI criteria, including presence of gaps, discoloration, or ditching at restoration margins.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months
Evaluation of restoration survival, including retention and presence of fractures or chipping, according to FDI functional criteria.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months
Assessment of patient-reported sensitivity following restoration placement, evaluated clinically using FDI biological criteria
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 9 months, and 12 months
Detection of secondary caries associated with the restorations using clinical examination based on FDI criteria.
Tanta University
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06924047
Class I Cavities in High Caries Risk, Class I Composite Restorations
View Trial DetailsNCT07415317
Composite Resins, Posterior Teeth
Tanta, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07405619
Composite Resins
Rize, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT04797494
Composite Resins, Randomized Controlled Trial
Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands
View Trial Details