MDT-2111 TAVI 23 mm
DeviceDevice: 23 mm MDT-2111 System for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) using the 23 mm MDT-2111 system.
NCT Number: NCT01634269
The primary objective of the present trial is to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the MDT-2111 in the treatment of symptomatic severe aortic stenosis in subjects with small aortic annuli and deemed difficult for surgical operation.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeAll sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kamakura, Kanagawa, Japan
The purpose of this trial is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the MDT-2111 TAV system in subjects with small annuli and symptomatic severe AS deemed difficult for surgical intervention. The primary endpoint is a composite of functional effectiveness as measured by improvement of at least 1 New York Heart Association (NYHA) class from baseline to 6 months and anatomical effectiveness as measured by Effective Orifice Area (EOA) ≥1.0 cm² at 6 months.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
mean gradient > 40 mmHg or jet velocity greater than 4.0 m/s by either resting or dobutamine stress echocardiogram, or simultaneous pressure recordings at cardiac catheterization (either resting or dobutamine stress), AND an initial aortic valve area of ≤ 0.8 cm² (or aortic valve area index ≤ 0.5 cm²/m²) by resting echocardiogram.
Exclusion criteria
Device: 23 mm MDT-2111 System for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) using the 23 mm MDT-2111 system.
Time frame: baseline and 6 months
The primary endpoint is a composite of functional effectiveness as measured by improvement of at least 1 NYHA class from baseline to 6 months and anatomical effectiveness as measured by Effective Orifice Area (EOA) ≥1.0 cm² at 6 months.
Time frame: 30 days
NEW YORK HEART ASSOCIATION CLASSIFICATION (NYHA) Class I: Subject with cardiac disease but without resulting limitations of physical activity.
Class II: Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in slight limitation of physical activity.
Class III: Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity.
Class IV: Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort.
Time frame: 6 months
NEW YORK HEART ASSOCIATION CLASSIFICATION (NYHA) Class I: Subject with cardiac disease but without resulting limitations of physical activity.
Class II: Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in slight limitation of physical activity.
Class III: Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity.
Class IV: Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort.
Time frame: 12 months
NEW YORK HEART ASSOCIATION CLASSIFICATION (NYHA) Class I: Subject with cardiac disease but without resulting limitations of physical activity.
Class II: Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in slight limitation of physical activity.
Class III: Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity.
Class IV: Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort.
Time frame: 24 months
NEW YORK HEART ASSOCIATION CLASSIFICATION (NYHA) Class I: Subject with cardiac disease but without resulting limitations of physical activity.
Class II: Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in slight limitation of physical activity.
Class III: Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity.
Class IV: Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort.
Time frame: 0 day to 30 days
MACCE is defined as a composite of:
Time frame: 0 day to 6 months
MACCE is defined as a composite of:
Time frame: 0 day to 12 months
MACCE is defined as a composite of:
Time frame: 0 day to 24 months
MACCE is defined as a composite of:
Time frame: after procedure or discharge
The following components must be satisfied for device success:
Time frame: from admission for procedure to discharge
Procedural success is defined as device success and absence of in-hospital MACCE.
Time frame: 30 days
Time frame: 6 months
Time frame: 12 months
Time frame: 24 months
Time frame: 30 days
Time frame: 6 months
Time frame: 12 months
Time frame: 24 months
Time frame: 30 days
Time frame: 6 months
Time frame: 12 months
Time frame: 24 months
Time frame: 30 days
Time frame: 6 months
Time frame: 12 months
Time frame: 24 months
Time frame: 0 day to 30 days
Time frame: 0 day to 6 months
Time frame: 0 day to 12 months
Time frame: 0 day to 24 months
Time frame: 0 day to 30 days
Time frame: 0 day to 6 months
Time frame: 0 day to 12 months
Time frame: 0 day to 24 months
Time frame: Baseline to 30 days
The SF-36 assessment was used to evaluate subject Quality of life (QoL) by assessing change in physical function and general health status. The SF-36 v2 ͭ ͫ Scoring Program was used to convert raw scores ranging from 0 to 100 into norm-based scores, allowing direct comparison to the reference values for the Japanese population. The Z-score of each subdomain is calculated as the numbers of standard deviation away from the Japanese population mean of the corresponding raw score. Norm-based score is then derived as fifty plus 10 times of the z-score. A norm-based score of less than 50 was interpreted as below average when compared to the Japanese population whereas norm-based scores greater than 50 were interpreted as above average.
Time frame: Baseline to 6 months
The SF-36 assessment was used to evaluate subject Quality of life (QoL) by assessing change in physical function and general health status. The SF-36 v2 ͭ ͫ Scoring Program was used to convert raw scores ranging from 0 to 100 into norm-based scores, allowing direct comparison to the reference values for the Japanese population. The Z-score of each subdomain is calculated as the numbers of standard deviation away from the Japanese population mean of the corresponding raw score. Norm-based score is then derived as fifty plus 10 times of the z-score. A norm-based score of less than 50 was interpreted as below average when compared to the Japanese population whereas norm-based scores greater than 50 were interpreted as above average.
Time frame: Baseline to 12 months
The SF-36 assessment was used to evaluate subject Quality of life (QoL) by assessing change in physical function and general health status. The SF-36 v2 ͭ ͫ Scoring Program was used to convert raw scores ranging from 0 to 100 into norm-based scores, allowing direct comparison to the reference values for the Japanese population. The Z-score of each subdomain is calculated as the numbers of standard deviation away from the Japanese population mean of the corresponding raw score. Norm-based score is then derived as fifty plus 10 times of the z-score. A norm-based score of less than 50 was interpreted as below average when compared to the Japanese population whereas norm-based scores greater than 50 were interpreted as above average.
Time frame: Baseline to 24 months
The SF-36 assessment was used to evaluate subject Quality of life (QoL) by assessing change in physical function and general health status. The SF-36 v2 ͭ ͫ Scoring Program was used to convert raw scores ranging from 0 to 100 into norm-based scores, allowing direct comparison to the reference values for the Japanese population. The Z-score of each subdomain is calculated as the numbers of standard deviation away from the Japanese population mean of the corresponding raw score. Norm-based score is then derived as fifty plus 10 times of the z-score. A norm-based score of less than 50 was interpreted as below average when compared to the Japanese population whereas norm-based scores greater than 50 were interpreted as above average.
Medtronic Cardiovascular
Industry
Medtronic MDT-2111 CoreValve Japan 23mm Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03056573
Aortic Valve Disease, Aortic Valve Stenosis
Copenhagen, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT02249000
Aortic Valve Disease, Aortic Valve Stenosis
Antwerp, Belgium
View Trial DetailsNCT02241109
Aortic Valve Disease, Aortic Valve Sclerosis
Bern, Switzerland
View Trial DetailsNCT04527367
Aortic Valve Disease, Aortic Valve Stenosis
Bialystok, Poland
View Trial Details