Clinical Optics Research Lab (CORL) Indiana University School of Optometry, Indiana University
Bloomington, Indiana, 47405, United States
NCT Number: NCT04016623
An evaluation of the clinical performance of the 1-day toric test contact lens compared to the 1-day toric control contact lens over one hour of lens wear.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Bloomington, Indiana, 47405, United States
A non-dispensing, double-masked, randomized, contralateral study comparing the 1-day toric test contact lens against the 1-day toric control contact lens to evaluate the clinical performance over one hour of lens wear. Each subject will be randomized to wear the test lens in one eye and the control lens in the other eye for each pair of lenses.
Each subject will be asked to wear four pairs of contact lenses in the study
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
somofilcon A 1-day toric test contact lens
Other names: Test contact lens, Invigor toric 1-day contact lens
somofilcon A 1-day toric control contact lens
Other names: Control contact lens
Time frame: 1 hour
Toric Mark visible or not visible. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
Time frame: Baseline
Average of lens toric mark mislocation from the resting toric mark away from the 6 o'clock position - measured in degrees.
Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
Time frame: 15 minutes
Average of lens toric mark mislocation from the resting toric mark away from the 6 o'clock position - measured in degrees.
Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
Time frame: 1 hour
Average of lens toric mark mislocation from the resting toric mark away from the 6 o'clock position - measured in degrees.
Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
Time frame: 15 minutes
Toric stability (maximal and minimal differences between extreme gazes) measured in degrees for up, down, right, and left gazes.
Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
Time frame: 1 hour
Rotational stability (maximal and minimal differences between extreme gazes) measured in degrees for up, down, right, and left gazes.
Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
Time frame: 15 minutes
Rotational Recovery for nasal and temporal - measured in degrees. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
Time frame: 1 hour
Rotational Recovery for nasal and temporal - measured in degrees. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
Time frame: 15 minutes
Toric fit acceptance and preference scale 0-4 (0 = can't be worn, 4 = optimum). Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
Time frame: 1 hour
Toric fit acceptance and preference scale 0-4 (0 = can't be worn, 4 = optimum). Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
Time frame: Baseline
Investigator's toric fitting preference - Test lens , No Preference , Control lens.
Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
Time frame: 1 hour
Investigator's toric fitting preference - Test lens, No Preference, Control lens.
Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
Time frame: 15 Minutes
Measurement of Lens Horizontal Centration in millimeters. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
Time frame: 1 hour
Measurement of Lens Horizontal Centration in millimeters. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
Time frame: 15 minutes
Lens Horizontal centration measured in mm. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
Time frame: 1 hour
Lens Horizontal centration measured in mm. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
Time frame: 15 minutes
Measurement of lens movement in millimeters. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
Time frame: 1 hour
Measurement of lens movement in millimeters. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
Time frame: 15 minutes
Lens push-up measured in percentage. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
Time frame: 1 hour
Lens push-up measured in percentage. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 control lenses).
Time frame: 15 minutes
Primary lens gaze lag measured in millimeters. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
Time frame: 1 hour
Primary lens gaze lag measured in millimeters. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
Time frame: 15 minutes
General lens fit acceptance and preference scale 0-4 (0 = unacceptable, 4 = optimal).
Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
Time frame: 1 hour
General lens fit acceptance and preference scale 0-4 (0 = unacceptable, 4 = optimal).
Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
Time frame: 15 minutes
Up gaze lag measured in millimeters. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
Time frame: 1 hour
Up gaze lag measured in millimeters. Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
Time frame: Baseline
Investigator's general lens fit preference - Test lens, No preference, Control lens.
Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
Time frame: 1 hour
Investigator's general lens fit preference - Test lens, No preference, Control lens.
Data for all 4 pairs were combined and analyzed (n=40 contact lenses).
CooperVision, Inc.
Industry
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06775509
Astigmatism, Eye Diseases
Tarragona, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT06784063
Astigmatism, Cataract
Bloomfield Hills, Michigan, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06749496
Astigmatism, Eye Diseases
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06967129
Astigmatism, Eye Diseases
Mission Viejo, California, United States
View Trial Details