Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06797843

Clinical Evaluation of Bioactive Resin Composites Versus Caries Control Technique in Management of Class I Carious Cavities in High Caries Risk Patients: a Randomized Clinical Trial

The aim of the study is to clinically evaluate the performance of S-PRG based & Alkasite based resin composite restorations versus conventional resin composite restorations after caries control in Class I carious cavities in posterior molar teeth over 1 year follow up.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

21 year–50 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

About this study

Traditionally, less conservative methods have been employed to treat tooth decay, which implied more loss of healthy dental tissue in order to increase the mechanical retention of the restorative material. Minimally invasive treatments have been proposed as an alternative therapy, which has evolved in with the development of new biomaterials.Bioactive restorative materials, as advocated by the FDI World Dental Federation, can promote mineralization/hard tissue creation, bacterial infection control, inflammation prevention, and tissue regeneration. In simpler terms : One efficient way to achieve bioactive functionalities in dental materials is to use particles that have the ability to release particular component.The development of "Giomer" based resin composites, which have the added benefit of prolonged fluoride and other ions release as well as rechargeability, is one of the key technological advances in resin composites to promote its usage as a bioactive material.In fact, Giomers with S-PRG fillers can release more fluoride than that of other fluoride-releasing restorations.Acid neutralization capacity by S-PRG fillers, one of many bioactive functions, is in which the pH of the surrounding environment became slightly alkaline upon contact with water or acidic solutions, exhibiting a modulation impact on acidic circumstances. Owing to the release of multiple ions, such modulation effect might be brought about by the release of Sr, B, Na, and F ions clarifying an acid buffering mechanism.A modification of GIC is Cention-N, which was introduced as a new resin-based material containing alkacid fillers, such as fluoride, calcium, and hydroxide ions, to neutralize acids. Owing to being tooth-colored, inexpensive, and having good flexural strength, It's considered as a subcategory of the composite material class.With properties similar to those of GICs and RBCs, Cention-N releases calcium, hydroxyl, and fluoride ions to prevent tooth demineralization. The presence of hydroxide ions on the material's surface may be crucial in neutralizing the acids that were produced by cariogenic bacteria Additionally, the filler's release of calcium and fluoride ions contributes in remineralization process.In Conclusion; S-PRG & Alkasite based composite restorative materials are able to release ions that contribute to tooth mineralization as well as have a modulation effect on the acidic conditions produced by oral cariogenic microorganisms.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient inclusion:
  • Adult Patients (Male or Females) aging ≥21-50 years.
  • Patients with high level of caries risk.
  • Patients with good likelihood of recall availability.

Tooth inclusion:

1- Permanent posterior molar teeth with primary simple occlusal Class I carious lesions (ICDAS 3 or 4 scores) 3- 2- Vital, periodontally sound and with positive reaction to cold stimulus. 4- 3-Well-formed and fully erupted in normal functional occlusion with natural antagonist and adjacent teeth

Exclusion criteria

  • Participants with general/systemic illness. 2- Pregnant or lactating females. 3- Concomitant participation in another research study. 4- Inability to comply with study procedures. 5- Heavy bruxism habits. 6- Last experience with allergic reactions against any components of the used materials.

7- Patients receiving orthodontic treatment.

Tooth exclusion:

  • Teeth with clinical symptoms of pulpitis such as spontaneous pain or sensitivity to pressure.
  • Non-vital teeth, Fractured or cracked teeth.
  • Secondary carious lesions.
  • Hypocalcified or hypoplastic teeth.

Treatment and study plan

"SPRG-based" Resin Composite : (BEAUTIFIL II, Shofu Inc. Kyoto, Japan).

Other

A fluoride releasing, highly aesthetic dental material that is S-PRG (Surface Pre-reacted Glass Ionomer) based , has the ability to recharge fluoride and appropriate for patients with a high caries index.

Alkasite based restoration : Cention N

Other

Cention N offers tooth-coloured esthetics together with high flexural strength. The new filling material belongs to the materials group of Alkasites. The patented alkaline filler increases the release of hydroxide ions to regulate the pH value during acid attacks. As a result, demineralization can be prevented. Moreover, the release of large numbers of fluoride and calcium ions forms a sound basis for the remineralization of dental enamel. The initiator system enables good chemical self-curing.

provisional Resin modified glass ionomer followed by Nanohybrid composite

Other

GC Fuji IX GP® EXTRA is the fastest setting glass ionomer on the market.The faster final set saves valuable chair time which provides improved stability against water, an important feature in challenging oral environments. This product contains a next generation glass filler which elicits higher translucency, fluoride release, reactivity and a faster setting time.

Then followed by Conventional Nano hybrid composite restoration(Neo Spectra® ST LV, Dentsply Sirona) which is nano-ceramic, light-cured, radiopaque, universal composite with novel SphereTEC filler technology.

Other names: Traditional Caries Control Technique

Primary outcomes

  1. Postoperative (hypersensitivity) and tooth vitality.

    Time frame: at baseline, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months.

    Revised FDI Criteria for Biological properties and by scoring:

    • clinically very good
    • clinically good
    • clinically sufficient
    • clinically unsatisfactory
    • clinically poor
  2. Caries at restoration margin (CAR).

    Time frame: at baseline,3 months, 6 months and 12 months.

    Revised FDI Criteria for Biological properties and by scoring:

    • clinically very good
    • clinically good
    • clinically sufficient
    • clinically unsatisfactory
    • clinically poor

Secondary outcomes

  1. Cost effectiveness

    Time frame: at baseline, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months.

    A. Cost of single restoration at baseline (for both groups) (Mean, ±SD). B. Average cost per restoration after1 year (Mean, ±SD).

    • - (for intervention group in case of adverse effects) (Mean, ±SD).
    • - (for control group: cost of the replacement with final restoration) in addition to the cost of adverse effects (Mean, ±SD).

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Sara M Khalil, Bachelor Degree(BDS)

CONTACT

[email protected]

+20-2(01008927568)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Cairo University

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Jan 29, 2025
Registry last updated
Mar 24, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.