Istanbul Medipol University School of Dentistry
Istanbul, 34083, Turkey (Türkiye)
NCT Number: NCT02763085
Evaluation of a new basic filling restorative material.
In contemporary dentistry, clinicians have essentially three types of material choices for direct restorations: amalgam, resin composite, and glass ionomer restoratives.
Due to the toxicity of mercury and the subsequent environmental problems, the search for alternatives continues and search into new composite restorative materials intensifies. Recognized disadvantages of tooth colored resin based restorative materials are as polymerization shrinkage, postoperative sensitivity and technical procedure complexity. Higher rates of occlusal wear and lower toughness are disadvantages of glass ionomer restoratives.
Therefore, alternative materials are being developed to compensate the disadvantages of current contemporary tooth coloured restorative materials. Nevertheless, the search for simplification for restoring missing dental tissues introduced the "basic filling concept".
This project aims to study the clinical performance of this new basic filling restorative material for Class I and Class II cavities. 80 patients are recruited to the project which is carried out at the School of dentistry, Istanbul Medipol University, Turkey.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Istanbul, 34083, Turkey (Türkiye)
The objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical performance of a new basic filling restorative material for Class I and Class II cavities that needs to be restored in permanent teeth.
Basic filling material combines the handling properties of glass ionomer restorative materials with the mechanical properties of resin composite restorative materials.
Extensive laboratory studies have been performed on the new material, but the clinical attributes have yet to be disclosed.
The study will be carried out as a prospective study, with assessment of the restorations after three year.
The project includes 80 patients. Most of the patients have been recruited from the Istanbul Medipol University Dental Clinics in Istanbul.
After giving their consent to take part in the study Class I & II restorations of both upper and lower molars and premolars are performed
The treatment procedure is:
The patients are offered local anesthetic before treatment start. The cavity is excavated and filled according to the guidelines for composite restorations.
The control procedure is:
The restoration is evaluated according to marginal adaptation, cavo surface marginal discoloration, approximal contact, fractures, caries associated with restorations and postoperative hypersensitivity. The controls will take place after two weeks, one year, two years and three years.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Tooth (teeth) affected by dental caries or with an existing defective filling will be restored using the materials listed (Basic Filling Material). Procedures will be done using local anesthesia. The cavity is excavated and filled according to the guidelines for ordinary restorative techniques.
Other names: Dental Filling
Time frame: at 3 years
2 independent evaluators The primary outcome will consist in the FDI (World Dental Federation) instrument for dental restorations assessment, as it was published after consensus in 2007 and updated in 2010 . This instrument is composed of three dimensions (biological, functional and esthetic), each consisting of several items that are assessed by clinical and radiographic examination according to Likert scales of 5 terms. Some items are evaluated quantitatively, others visually.The worst score of all items is retained as the overall score of the restoration, thus resulting in a single (ordinal) primary outcome.
Hickel R, Peschke A, Tyas M, Mjör I, Bayne S, Peters M, Hiller KA, Randall R, Vanherle G, Heintze SD. FDI World Dental Federation: clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations-update and clinical examples. Clin Oral Investig. 2010 Aug;14(4):349-66.
Time frame: at 3 years
0 = No plaque in the gingival area.
Time frame: at 3 years
0 = Normal gingival.
Istanbul Medipol University Hospital
Other
Clinical Evaluation of "Basic Filling" Material in Class I and II Cavities: A Prospective Controlled Clinical Trial up to 3 Years
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05505084
Caries, Stomatognathic Diseases
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04645693
Caries, Disease Attributes
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05211843
Caries, Metabolomic Profile
San Francisco, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04708223
Caries, Defective Tooth Restorations
Chicago, Illinois, United States
View Trial Details