JJV Investigational Multifocal Contact Lens
DeviceTEST Lens
NCT Number: NCT04534517
The clinical study is a bilateral, single-masked (partial), single-arm, clinical trial. A total of approximately 60 eligible subjects both near-sighted and far-sighted, will be targeted to complete the study. Subjects will be fit in the study lens for approximately 2-4 days then undergo lens optimization, if required. Subjects will then be given a new pair of lenses that will be worn for approximately 2 weeks.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me40 year–70 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Dr. James Weber & Associates, PA, Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
TEST Lens
The spherical test lens was used in the troubleshooting steps only for low ADD subjects who have reported a distance vision complaint.
Other names: senofilcon A
Time frame: 2-Week Follow-up
Overall vision scores were assessed using the Contact Lens User Experience™ (CLUE) questionnaire. CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patient experience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response with a range of 0-120. The average CLUE vision score for each sphere stratum (Hyperope and Myope) was reported.
Time frame: 2-Week Follow-up
Binocular visual performance on logMAR (Logarithm of Minimal Angle of Resolution) scale was evaluated at distance (4m), intermediate (64cm) and near (40cm) under high luminance high contrast lighting condition using ETDRS (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study) charts. The room illuminance was required to be between 7.3 to 7.9 EV (394-597 lux). For Distance (4m), the acceptable range for the chart luminance was 10.5-10.7 EV (181 208 cd/m2). For Intermediate (64cm) and Near (40cm), the acceptable range for the chart luminance 10.8-11.1 EV (223-274 cd/m2). Letter-by-letter results calculated the visual performance score for each chart read. A logMAR score closer to zero, or below zero, indicates a better visual acuity. A logMAR visual performance score of 0.0 is equivalent to Snellen visual acuity of 20/20. Data from hyperopes and myopes were combined for this outcome since logMAR scores between the two populations are similar.
Time frame: Up to 2-Week Follow-up
Contact lens fitting acceptance was assessed for each subject eye using a biomicroscope post lens insertion and the 2-week follow-up. Lens fit was a binary variable where acceptable lens fit=1 and unacceptable lens fit=0. The proportion of eyes with unacceptable lens fit was reported. Data from the hyperope and myopes group were combined for this outcome since lens fitting characteristerics are similar for these two populations.
Time frame: Up to 2-Week Follow-up
Slit Lamp Findings (SLF) were assessed using a biomicroscope and was graded using the FDA grading scale (Grade: 0, 1,2, 3 and 4) with grade 0 represents the absence of findings and 1 to 4 representing successively worse findings (i.e. Grade 1 = trace, Grade 2 = Mild, Grade 3 = moderate and Grade 4 = severe). This was performed on each subject eye at every study visit (baseline, unscheduled visits and 2-week follow-up). The data was then dichotomized into two groups. Those with grade 3 or higher and those with grade 2 or lower. The proportion of eyes with SLF with grade 3 or higher was reported. Data from the hyperope and myopes group were combined for this outcome since the rate of SLFs grade 3 + is similar for both populations.
Time frame: Up to 2-Week Follow-up
The number of lenses to achieve the optimal pair for each subject was calculated as the original pair (2) plus all the required modifications to reach the optimal pair. In this study the minimum number of lenses per subject used was 2 where the maximum possible number of lenses used was 12. The data was dichotomized as Y=1 if the subject was able to achieve optimal lens pair in 4 lenses or lenses or less and 0 otherwise. A lens modification was performed if the subject reports unsatisfactory vision or was unable to obtain 20/30 distance visual acuity in both eyes. If the subject reported satisfactory vision with the lenses a modification was not required. However, based upon the investigator's findings on the measured visual acuity and/or over-refraction a modification may have been performed. Data for the hyperope and myope groups were combined for this endpoint since the number of lenses needed to optimize vision is indpendent of which group a subject belongs to.
Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.
Industry
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07174596
Visual Acuity
Roswell, Georgia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07076160
Eye Diseases, Presbyopia
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06864858
Visual Acuity
Maitland, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07443215
Visual Acuity
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
View Trial Details