Erasmus University Medical Center
Rotterdam, South Holland, 3000 CA, Netherlands
Location contact
Antoon JM van den Enden
CONTACT
Christiaan L. Meuwese, MD PhD
SUB_INVESTIGATOR
Nicolas M Van Mieghem, Prof MD PhD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
NCT Number: NCT06414187
The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to appraise the impact of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) in the treatment of early stages of cardiogenic shock, irrespective of etiology. Findings of this randomized trial may enhance clinical decision making regarding the use of MCS in specific subsets of patients in early stages of cardiogenic shock.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
* What are the effects of IABP on a composite of clinical endpoints representing clinical deterioration at 30-days in patients presenting with SCAI stage B or C cardiogenic shock? * What is the 1-year clinical outcome (including mortality and hospital admissions for cardiovascular causes) of patients treated with vs. without IABP for early cardiogenic shock? * Is there a difference in efficacy of IABP within the treatment of early cardiogenic shock related to Acute Coronary Syndrome versus non-ischemic causes? * Is there a difference in efficacy of IABP within the treatment of SCAI stage B versus stage C cardiogenic shock?
Participants will be 1:1 randomized to IABP support or standard of care (a treatment strategy including inotropes and/or vasopressors but no IABP insertion). Patients will be stratified for Acute Coronary Syndrome/non-ischemic etiology and stage B/stage C cardiogenic shock, following stratification to center. Researchers will compare the group who was randomized to IABP to the control group (i.e. standard of care) to see if there is a difference in the primary trial endpoint after 30-days, including 1) all-cause mortality, 2) escalation to invasive mechanical ventilation, 3) escalation of mechanical circulatory support strategy, 4) acute kidney injury and 5) stroke or transient ischemic attack.
Trial opening soon.
Get Notified18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Rotterdam, South Holland, 3000 CA, Netherlands
Antoon JM van den Enden
CONTACT
Christiaan L. Meuwese, MD PhD
SUB_INVESTIGATOR
Nicolas M Van Mieghem, Prof MD PhD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Rationale: The scientific underpinning for the use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in early cardiogenic shock, especially for the intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), is scarce and insufficiently clarified for different etiologies of cardiogenic shock. Previous randomized trials limited the inclusion criteria to patients with ischemic cardiogenic shock while observational research suggested favorable effects of timely adoption of IABP in patients with deteriorating myocardial function through ischemic or non-ischemic causes. Early stage of cardiogenic shock is defined by relative hypotension without hypoperfusion, or hypoperfusion still responsive to therapy (Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, SCAI, stage B and C, respectively). A tightening of global guidelines with respect to the clinical adoption of IABP overshadowed the potential beneficial effects for specific patient categories within the total spectrum of cardiogenic shock. Patients currently presenting with early stages of cardiogenic shock caused by ischemic or non-ischemic etiology are hypothetically undertreated due to an assumed lack of clinical benefit of IABP in general. The aim of this randomized trial is to appraise the impact of IABP in the treatment of early stages of cardiogenic shock, irrespective of etiology. Findings of this randomized trial may enhance clinical decision making regarding the use of MCS in specific subsets of patients in early stages of cardiogenic shock.
Objective: The primary objective of this trial is to evaluate the 30-day clinical impact of IABP within the treatment of early (SCAI stage B or C) cardiogenic shock. Secondary objectives are
Trial design: Open-label, multicenter, investigator-initiated, randomized controlled trial.
Trial population: The trial population consists of patients in early cardiogenic shock, defined as SCAI stage B or C, either related or unrelated to ACS.
Intervention: Patients enrolled in this trial will be 1:1 randomized to IABP support or standard of care (i.e. inotropes and/or vasopressors but no IABP insertion). Patients will be stratified for ACS/non-ischemic etiology and stage B/stage C cardiogenic shock following stratification according to center.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
A patient is eligible for trial inclusion if, at the time of randomization, no more than 1 inotropic agent has been administered AND when the maximum dose of noradrenaline/norepinephrine has not exceeded 0.2 ug/kg/min in the context of mean arterial pressure >65 mmHg.
Exclusion criteria
Patients who are randomized to the IABP-arm will be supported with IABP according to local, clinical guidelines (including algorithms for anticoagulation, verification of correct positioning and weaning strategies). The IABP console and disposables should be used according to the instructions for use, including the use of an appropriate-sized IABP balloon alligned with patient length and height.
Time frame: 30-days post enrollment
The primary endpoint of the trial is the composite of the following outcomes: 1) all-cause mortality, 2) escalation to invasive mechanical ventilation, 3) escalation of mechanical circulatory support, 4) acute kidney injury and 5) stroke or transient ischemic attack.
Time frame: 30-day follow-up
See primary outcome (%) (based on details stated in patient's records)
Time frame: 30-day follow-up
See primary outcome (%) (based on details stated in patient's records)
Time frame: 30-day follow-up
See primary outcome (%) (based on details stated in patient's records)
Time frame: 30-day follow-up
See primary outcome (%) (based on details stated in patient's records)
Time frame: 30-day follow-up
See primary outcome (%) (based on details stated in patient's records)
Time frame: 30-day follow-up
Any steps in noradrenaline increase at least 0.2 ug/kg/min, or intensifying inotropic treatment (i.e. dose increasing or initiation of new agents) are considered treatment escalation, irrespective of trial arm. Uptitration of noradrenaline up to 0.2 ug/kg/min is considered standard of care. Treatment escalation also includes the initiation of MCS (including the institution of IABP in the standard of care-arm or escalation to e.g. continuous flow or extracorporeal mechanical circulatory support in the IABP-arm).
Time frame: 30-day follow-up
If the patient entered the trial meeting criteria for SCAI stage B
Time frame: at 7 and 14 days after randomization
Degradation to SCAI stage D or E
Time frame: 30-day follow-up
Following randomization to the IABP-arm, specifying major and minor vascular complications as well as major and minor access-related non-vascular complications
Time frame: 30-day follow-up
Following randomization to the IABP-arm
Time frame: 30-day and 1-year follow-up
i.e. type 1 myocardial infarction
Time frame: 30-day follow-up
Including an appropriate shock of an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator
Time frame: 96-hours after randomization
Defined according to the Surviving Sepsis Guidelines
Time frame: 30-day follow-up and 1-year follow-up
Including presumed cause of death
Time frame: 30-day follow-up
Stay after randomization
Time frame: 30-day follow-up
After randomization
Time frame: 30-day follow-up
After randomization
Time frame: 30-day follow-up
Including percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft
Time frame: 1-year follow-up
Including 1) all-cause mortality and 2) hospital admission because of cardiovascular disease
Time frame: 1-year follow-up
See 1-Year composite endpoint (percent), including 1) all-cause mortality and 2) hospital admission because of cardiovascular disease. Based on details stated in the patient's record.
Time frame: 1-year follow-up
See 1-Year composite endpoint (percent), including 1) all-cause mortality and 2) hospital admission because of cardiovascular disease. Based on details stated in the patient's record.
Time frame: 1-year follow-up
Including a description of the presumed cause of hospital (re-)admission
Time frame: 1-year follow-up
Of note, visits necessitating treatment escalation for heart failure
Time frame: 1-year follow-up
Including details concerning the revascularization attempt (i.e. percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft)
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Erasmus Medical Center
Other
Clinical Effects of Intra-aortic Balloon Support in Early Acute Coronary Syndrome and Non-Acute Coronary Syndrome Related Cardiogenic Shock: a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
Acronym: IABP ON-TIME
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05426083
Acute Coronary Syndrome, Cardiogenic Shock
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07090382
Acute Coronary Syndrome, Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI)
Bratislava, Slovakia
View Trial DetailsNCT06162247
Acute Cardiovascular Disease, Acute Coronary Syndrome
Naples, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT06792643
Acute Coronary Syndrome, Cardiogenic Shock
Milan, Italy
View Trial Details