Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06834334

Clinical Effectiveness of Advanced Hybrid Closed-loop Systems for Achieving Time in Tight Range Among T1D Patients

Diabetes is a chronic disease with a relevant public health burden. Maintaining blood glucose levels as close to normal as possible is essential to avoid the associated microvascular and macrovascular complications. Therefore, the key to prevent and/or reduce the development of these chronic complications lies in an adequate and strict glycemic control.

This study consist of a cross-sectional observational study among adult patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D). The main objective is to analyze the effect on time in tight range (TiTR, 70-140 mg/dL) of interstitial glucose between three different advanced hybrid closed-loop (AHCL) systems.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–99 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Badajoz University Hospital, Badajoz, Spain

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Diabetes is a chronic disease with a relevant public health burden. Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is characterized by the autoimmune destruction of insulin-producing pancreatic beta cells, which requires the administration of exogenous insulin for its treatment. Maintaining blood glucose levels as close to normal as possible is essential to avoid the associated microvascular and macrovascular complications that affect quality of life, as well as morbidity and mortality due to the deleterious long-term effects of suboptimal control. Therefore, the key to prevent and/or reduce the development of these complications lies in adequate and strict glycemic control.

The use of advanced hybrid closed-loop (AHCL) systems in patients with T1D is associated with improved glycemic control and quality of life in both controlled clinical trials and real-life studies. Since 2021, AHCL systems are considered the standard of care, ahead of traditional MDI.

There are three main types of AHCL systems marketed in Spain: SmartGuard in Medtronic Minimed 780G (MM780G), Control-IQ in Tandem T Slim X2 (TTSX2) and CamAPS in Ypsopump (CamAPS).

All three systems have been shown indepently to significantly improve glycaemic control in people with DM1 as expressed by the classic control targets of the International Time in Range Consensus (percentage of interstitial glucose time in range 70-180 mg/dL >70%). So much so that it has been suggested to further intensify the possible glucose targets in patients treated with AHCL systems to a time in tight range (TITR) of interstitial glucose (70-140 mg/dL) >50%.

However, there is little information on the benefits and safety of using tighter control targets. Furthermore, there is no evidence about comparing the clinical benefit differences between these three types of technology.

The main objective is to analyze the effect on time in tight range (TiTR, 70-140 mg/dL) of interstitial glucose between three different advanced hybrid closed-loop (AHCL) systems among adult people with T1D.

This is multicenter (3 centers) cross-sectional observational clinical study (non-randomized). The target population will be adult T1D patients treated with any of the aforementioned AHCL systems followed in any of the three participant centers.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with type 1 diabetes.
  • Age greater than or equal to 18 years.
  • Treated with advanced hybrid closed-loop systems (AHCL) for at least 3 months
  • Actived continuous glucose monitoring data in the last 14 days.

Exclusion criteria

  • Other types of diabetes.
  • Receiving treatment with insulin regimens other than AHCL.
  • Having received AHCL treatment for less than 3 months in a row prior to inclusion in the study with the same system.
  • No data on use of the AHCL system during the previous 14 days.
  • Severe or uncontrolled psychiatric disorder.
  • Pregnancy or end of pregnancy less than 3 months ago or preparation for pregnancy.

Treatment and study plan

MM780G

Device

SmartGuard in Medtronic Minimed 780G advaced hybrid closed-loop

Other names: Medtronic Minimed 780G

TTSX2

Device

Control-IQ in Tandem T Slim X2 advanced hybrid closed-loop

Other names: Tandem T Slim X2

CamAPS

Device

CamAPS Fx in Ypsopump advanced hybrid closed-loop

Other names: CamAPS Fx

Primary outcomes

  1. TiTR

    Time frame: Retrospective data from the last 14 days after study entry

    Percentage differences in time in tight range (TiTR, 70-140 mg/dL) of interstitial glucose.

Secondary outcomes

  1. TIR

    Time frame: Retrospective data from the last 14 days after study entry

    Percentage differences in time in range (TIR, 70-180 mg/dL) of interstitial glucose.

  2. TAR1

    Time frame: Retrospective data from the last 14 days after study entry

    Percentage differences in time above range 1 (180-250 mg/dL) of interstitial glucose.

  3. TAR2

    Time frame: Retrospective data from the last 14 days after study entry

    Percentage differences in time above range 2 (>250 mg/dL) of interstitial glucose.

  4. TBR1

    Time frame: Retrospective data from the last 14 days after study entry

    Percentage differences in time bellow range 1 (<70 mg/dL) of interstitial glucose.

  5. TBR2

    Time frame: Retrospective data from the last 14 days after study entry

    Percentage differences in time bellow range 2 (<55 mg/dL) of interstitial glucose.

  6. HbA1C

    Time frame: Retrospective data from the last 3 months after study entry

    Differences in HbA1C values (%)

  7. AHCL use

    Time frame: Retrospective data from the last 14 days after study entry

    Percentage differences in time of use of the AHCL system (%)

  8. Insulin use

    Time frame: Retrospective data from the last 14 days after study entry

    Daily dose of insulin use in AHCL system (UI/day)

  9. Coefficient of variation

    Time frame: Retrospective data from the last 14 days after study entry

    Percentage differences in the coefficient of variation of interstitial glucose (%)

  10. Quality-of-life questionnaire designed for diabetes mellitus (EsDQOL)

    Time frame: Retrospective quality-of-life during the last 3 months

    Assessing the perceived quality of life according to the EsDQOL questionnaire (with values between 46 and a maximum of 230, the higher the score the poorer the satisfaction with ACHL treatment).

  11. Hypoglycemia Fear Survey (HFS questionnaire)

    Time frame: Retrospective fear to hypoglycemia during the last 3 months

    Assessing the fear of hypoglycemia according to the HFS questionnaire (with values between 24 points and a maximum of 120 points, the higher the score the higher the fear of hypoglycemia).

  12. Clarke's questionnaire

    Time frame: Retrospective hypoglycemia awareness during the last 3 months

    Assessing the awareness of hypoglycemia according to Clarke's questionnaire (with values between 0 and 8 points, a score equal or greater than four indicates hypoglycemia unawareness).

Other outcomes

  1. Differences in the Percetage of patients fullfilling the International Consensus of Time in Range

    Time frame: Retrospective data from the last 14 days after study entry

    Differences in the Percetage of patients fullfilling the International Consensus of Time in Range (TAR2 <5%, TAR1 <25%, TIR >70%, TBR1 <4%, TBR2 <1%, CV>36%).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Castilla-La Mancha Health Service

Other

Collaborators

  • Hospital Mutua de Terrassa
  • Servicio Extremeño de Salud (Spain)

Registry information

Official study title

Clinical Effectiveness of Advanced Hybrid Closed-loop Systems (AHCL) for Achieving Time in Tight Range (TiTR) of Interstitial Glucose Among Adult Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) Patients

Acronym: TightT1

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Feb 19, 2025
Registry last updated
Mar 19, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.