Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04304586

Clinical Cross Reactions Between Anacardiaceae

The prevalence of food allergies has increased in recent decades, ranging from 1 to 3% of the general population. According to international literature and French national surveys, nuts today represent a group of allergens often associated with severe allergic reactions. They are responsible for 18 to 40% of deaths from food-related anaphylaxis.

Among all nuts, the prevalence of anacardiac allergies (mainly cashew and pistachio) continues to increase and has become a growing public health problem. Today, global production is estimated at 4.9 million tonnes of cashews and 1.1 million tonnes of pistachios. The resulting increased exposure may explain the increased prevalence of allergic reactions reported to these fruits. In addition, anaphylactic reactions to anacardiaceae are reported to be even more severe than those occurring in subjects allergic to peanuts.

Cashews and pistachios are known to exhibit immunological cross-reactions with one another. In fact, they have a strong sequential homology between their storage allergens Ana o 1 / Pis v 3 (7S vicilin, 78% homology); Ana o 2 / Pis v 2 (legume 11S, 80% homology) and Ana o 3 / Pis v 1 (albumin 2S, 70% homology). For this reason, some authors talk about the cashew / pistachio syndrome and associate the two allergenic sources by considering them as one, in clinical practice.

The diagnosis of allergy to nuts, and therefore to anacardiaceae, is based on a compatible clinical history, the presence of specific IgE (demonstrated by positivity to realistic skin tests and serum IgE assay), and positivity on the oral food challenge test.

In clinical practice, taking into account the cashew / pistachio syndrome, when the allergy work-up for cashew is negative, allergists tend to advise to reintroduce pistachio at home, considering the two allergens as sufficiently homologous to authorize such a practice. In this context, the investigators decided to check whether this practice, which is based mainly on in vitro homologies, is risk-free, based on the clinical experience of our center.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Uhmontpellier

Montpellier, 34295, France

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient evaluated at the Allergy Unit of the University Hospital of Montpellier (France)
  • Suspicion of food allergy to Anacardiaceae
  • Allergy work-up for cashew and pistachio including at least skin tests, and possible specific IgE and food challenge

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients included in other trials that don't allow them to be included in the present one

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. PPV and NPV

    Time frame: 1 day

    PPV and NPV of the results of skin tests and food challenge to either cashew or pistachio to predict a concordant result for pistachio or cashew, respectively

Secondary outcomes

  1. Relative risk

    Time frame: 1 day

    Finding risk factors predictive of discrepancies between the results of the allergy work-up for cashew and pistachio

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Montpellier

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Evaluating the Correlation Between the Results of the Allergy Work-up for Different Allergens of the Anacardiaceae Family

Acronym: Cross-Anacards

Important dates

Study start
2006
Primary completion
2020
Study completion
2020
First posted
Mar 11, 2020
Registry last updated
Jun 5, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.