Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01233076

Clinical Comparison of Two Daily Disposable Contact Lenses in a Population of Daily Disposable Contact Lens Wearers

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the performance of two commercially marketed daily disposable contact lenses in a population of daily disposable contact lens wearers.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Myopia Eye Diseases Refractive Errors

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Currently wearing daily disposable lenses in daily wear, daily disposable modality, except DAILIES AquaComfort Plus and 1-DAY ACUVUE TruEye.
  • Able to wear study lenses in the available powers from -1.00D to -6.00D.
  • Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply.

Exclusion criteria

  • Eye injury within twelve weeks of enrollment.
  • History of corneal or refractive surgery.
  • Pre-existing ocular irritation that would preclude contact lens fitting.
  • Currently enrolled in any clinical trial.
  • Currently wearing DAILIES AquaComfort Plus or 1-DAY ACUVUE TruEye lenses.
  • Monovision correction during the study.
  • Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply.

Treatment and study plan

Nelfilcon A contact lens

Device

Commercially marketed, spherical contact lens for daily wear, daily disposable use

Other names: DAILIES AquaComfort Plus

Narafilcon B Contact Lens

Device

Commercially marketed (US), spherical contact lens for daily wear, daily disposable use

Other names: 1-DAY ACUVUE TruEye

Primary outcomes

  1. Overall Vision Quality

    Time frame: 1 week of wear

    Overall vision quality, as interpreted by the participant and recorded on a questionnaire as a single, retrospective evaluation of 1 week of wear. Overall vision quality is evaluated binocularly and rated on a 10-point scale, with 1 being poor and 10 being excellent.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

CIBA VISION

Industry

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2010
Primary completion
2010
Study completion
2010
First posted
Nov 3, 2010
Registry last updated
Jul 10, 2012

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.