Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
Roma, 00168, Italy
NCT Number: NCT07427784
Dental implants are considered a predictable rehabilitative option following tooth extraction or in cases of missing teeth. In some situations, the inevitable alveolar ridge resorption that occurs after extraction may make the placement of standard-diameter (>3.5 mm) or standard-length implants difficult or even impossible without advanced bone augmentation procedures. To counteract post-extraction volumetric bone contraction, alveolar ridge preservation can be performed, consisting of placing a bone graft within the socket walls immediately after tooth extraction. Although this procedure cannot completely prevent dimensional changes, it has been shown to significantly reduce both horizontal and vertical ridge resorption, as reported in the scientific literature. However, there is a lack of clinical and radiographic studies evaluating the outcomes of implant rehabilitation following alveolar ridge preservation with standard-dimension implants in a hospital-based setting.
Trial opening soon.
Get Notified18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Roma, 00168, Italy
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: From tooth extraction to 6 months of follow up.
The dimensional change of hard tissues following bone regenerative procedures will be assessed radiographically by measuring horizontal and vertical bone resorption through CBCT comparison in patients treated in a hospital-based setting.
Time frame: From tooth extraction to 5 years of follow-up
Assessed using the PES/WES esthetic index. Scores range from 0 to 14 for the PES and from 0 to 10 for the WES, with higher scores indicating better esthetic outcomes.
Time frame: From tooth extraction to 5 years of follow up
Absence of biological and technical complications, expressed as a proportion
Time frame: From tooth extraction to 5 years follow up
Rate of dental implants remaining in situ, measured as a proportion
Time frame: From tooth extraction to 5 years of follow up
Absence of technical complications, expressed as a proportion
Time frame: From tooth extraction to 5 years of follow up
Rate of prostheses remaining in situ, expressed as a proportion
Time frame: From tooth extraction to 5 years of follow up
Recorded using a specifically designed questionnaire and measured with a visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating better outcomes
Time frame: From tooth extraction to 5 years of follow up
Analysis of the influence of diabetes (assessed as presence/absence) as potential risk factor during follow-up
Time frame: From tooth extraction to 5 years of follow up
Analysis of glycated hemoglobin levels recorded at baseline and during follow-up
Time frame: From tooth extraction to 5 years of follow up
Correlation between exposure to medications affecting bone and soft tissue metabolism and peri-implant marginal bone loss (measured in millimeters on standardized periapical radiographs) and implant success (defined as the absence of complications).
Time frame: From tooth extraction to 5 years of follow up
Correlation between osteoporosis status (DXA T-score/ICD diagnosis) and peri-implant marginal bone loss (measured in millimeters on standardized periapical radiographs) and implant success (defined as the absence of complications).
Time frame: From tooth extraction to 5 years of follow up
Correlation between cardiovascular diseases and peri-implant marginal bone loss (measured in millimeters on standardized periapical radiographs) and implant success (defined as the absence of complications).
Time frame: From tooth extraaction to 5 years of follow up
Analysis of the influence of complete blood count parameters
Time frame: From tooth extraction to 6 months of follow up
Histomorphometric analysis of hard and soft tissues on stained histologic sections (% new bone, residual graft, epithelial thickness, keratin layer thickness, inflammatory infiltrate, collagen organization, and vascular density)
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
Other
Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Alveolar Ridge Preservation for Implant-prosthetic Rehabilitation in a Hospital Setting: a Prospective Study
Acronym: REGSYST
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07091448
Alveolar Ridge Preservation
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07373600
Alveolar Ridge Preservation, Dental Implant Placement
View Trial DetailsNCT07239193
Alveolar Ridge Preservation, Socket Preservation
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07001345
Alveolar Ridge Preservation, Dental Implants, Single-tooth
Rotterdam, South Holland, Netherlands
View Trial Details