Adel Elbardissy
Cairo, 11311, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT03582319
Aim of the study: To compare Formocresol and Biodentine clinically and radiographically when used for pulpotomy of primary molars Study Design : A randomized control clinical trial (split mouth and double blind) was conducted on 43 (4-6 years-old) children with decayed vital mandibular primary molars which were treated by pulpotomy using both medicaments . All treated teeth were followed for one year (at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months clinically and at 6 and 9 radiographically).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me4 year–6 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Cairo, 11311, Egypt
Study design Randomized clinical trial, double blinded using split mouth technique. Study setting This study was carried out in Pediatric Dentistry Department-Faculty of Dentistry-Cairo University- Egypt.
Patients
Patients recruited for this study were selected according to the following criteria:
Sample size calculation using sealedenvelop.com, (30) the online sample calculator, sample size was calculated assuming the null hypothesis that biodentine and formocresol have an average success rate of 95,99 % and 87.8 % respectively (26, 31,32,33). Thus planning a binary outcome non inferiority trial with a difference of 8.19 %, then 76 primary molars (38 per group) are required to be 90% sure that the upper limit of a one-sided 95% confidence interval will exclude a difference in favor of the standard group of more than 10% (34).
With an estimation of 10% annual dropout, sample size was set to 86 primary molars (43 per group) (35). Forty three children with the matching criteria of patient selection were included in this study.
Research Ethics Committee approval was obtained from Faculty of Dentistry Cairo University. Detailed treatment plan and procedures were explained to the parents and informed written consent s were obtained before practical work.
Randomization Using 4 times folded papers in which one of the tested materials was written (43 paper for each material) contained in a closed white envelops (43 envelop in each one folded paper of each tested materials were placed), the selected two matched bilateral deep carious primary mandibular molars were randomly allocated to one of the tested materials.
When guardians agreed for their child to participate in the trial, an envelope was drowned and patient personal data was written on it. At the time of treatment of the first tooth in each patient, one of the folded papers was taken from the envelope and the type of the dressing material was recorded. Trial participant and outcome assessors were blinded to the type of materials used in each tooth.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Biodentine is mainly composed of tricalcium silicate, calcium carbonate and zirconium oxides while the liquid contains calcium chloride as the setting accelerator and water reducing agent
Formocresol is a devitalizing and fixing agent which was introduced to dentistry since 1904 with full concentration of Buckley's formula (19% formaldehyde, 35 % cresol, and 15 % glycerin in distilled water). A five times diluted formula of Buckley's formocresol was used in this study.
Other names: Tricresol formalin
Time frame: 3,6,9 and12 months.
measurement of survival rate regarding absence of spontaneous pain and assessing the change over time ( binary outcome measured by direct questioning to the patient.
Time frame: 3, 6, 9 and 12 months.
Absence of abscess, fistula or pathologic mobility ( binary outcome measured by visual and clinical examination).
Time frame: 6 and 12 months.
Absence of periapical or inter-radicular radiolucency (binary outcome detected by periapical x-ray ) with assessment of change over time.
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
Absence of external or internal root resorption(binary outcome detected by periapical x-ray ) with assessment of change over time.
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
Absence of calcific metamorphosis in the radicular pulp canal (binary outcome detected by periapical x-ray ) with assessment of change over time.
Cairo University
Other
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Biodentine Versus Formocresol in Vital Pulpotomy of Primary Molars: (A Randomized Control Clinical Trial)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07715383
Dental Pulp Diseases, Pulp Disease, Dental
Cairo, Abbasia, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07689838
Apical Periodontitis, Dental Caries
Riyadh, Riyadh Region, Saudi Arabia
View Trial DetailsNCT06129643
Apical Periodontitis, Dental Pulp Diseases
Cairo, Abbassia, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07445633
Dental Pulp Diseases, Pulp Disease, Dental
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial Details