Cairo University dental hospital
Cairo, Cairo Governorate, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT06195449
To evaluate the clinical and radiographic performance of Alkasite restorative material versus glass ionomer in restoration of primary molars.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me5 year–7 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Cairo, Cairo Governorate, Egypt
Restorations replacements are mostly caused by the existence of caries lesions surrounding the restorations, which are commonly referred to as secondary caries .
Secondary or recurrent caries is characterized as "lesions that occur at the edges of previously placed dental restorations" or "caries that develop in association with dental restorations or sealants" (CARS).Proper seal at the tooth surface restoration interface is essential . That's why the most frequently material used is (GIC) with the advantage of chemical adhesion to tooth structure, superior esthetics, and long-term fluoride release providing cariostatic effect, but it has the disadvantage of slow setting rate, low fracture toughness, susceptibility to moisture contamination, dehydration during initial phase of setting, and poor wear resistance.
Resin Modified Glass Ionomer and Composite have always been the preferred material for restoration although several modifications have been made recently to improve its properties, Cent ion N is one of the recent ones.
Cent ion N is a tooth-colored basic filling material for direct restoration. It belongs to the material of Alka sites, with high flexural strength. It also has calcium and fluoride releasing properties comparable to conventional GIC, besides it is quick and easy to use.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Restorative material for primary teeth
Other names: cention n
Restorative material for primary teeth
Other names: GIC
Time frame: 12 months
Radiograph &Visual inspection using Modified United States Public Health Service Ryge criteria (USPHS
Time frame: 12 months
Visual Inspection using Modified United States Public Health Service Ryge criteria (USPHS)
Time frame: 12 months
by Visual Inspection using Modified United States Public Health Service Ryge criteria (USPHS)
Time frame: 12 months
by Visual Inspection and Explorer using Modified United States Public Health Service Ryge criteria (USPHS)
Time frame: 12 months
by Visual Inspection and Explorer using Modified United States Public Health Service Ryge criteria (USPHS)
Cairo University
Other
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Alkasite Restorative Material Versus Glass Ionomer Cement in Restoration of Primary Molars: Randomized Clinical Trial.
Acronym: GIC
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06348953
Caries; Dentin, Deep Caries
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07278180
Caries Active, Dental Caries
View Trial DetailsNCT06130189
Behavior, Behavior, Animal
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06354634
Dental Caries, Stomatognathic Diseases
Richmond, Virginia, United States
View Trial Details