Instituto Universitario de Investigación en Atención Primaria (IDIAP Jordi Gol)
Lleida, 25100, Spain
NCT Number: NCT07692516
The aim of this clinical trial is to determine whether point-of-care ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injection is more effective than conventional injection guided by anatomical landmarks or standard oral medication for patients with upper-extremity conditions (subacromial impingement syndrome [SAS] or carpal tunnel syndrome [CTS]) in primary care.
The main questions this study seeks to answer are:
Does ultrasound-guided injection provide superior long-term pain relief compared to blind anatomical injection and oral medication?
Does ultrasound-guided injection lead to better functional recovery and improved health-related quality of life in patients?
Is ultrasound-guided injection a cost-effective strategy from both the healthcare system and societal perspectives (including reducing sick leave)?
This study represents the quantitative phase of the mixed-methods Q-EPICAP study. Researchers will compare three parallel groups across 23 primary care centers to determine the most effective and efficient treatment strategy.
Participants will:
Receive one of three assigned treatments: blind anatomical infiltration (Group I), ultrasound-guided infiltration (Group UI), or standard oral drug therapy (Group P).
Attend follow-up assessments at baseline and at 15, 30, 90, and 180 days after the initial intervention.
Complete questionnaires to assess pain intensity (Visual Analog Scale), upper limb function (ASES or Boston Disability Assessment Questionnaire), and quality of life (EQ-5D-5L).
Provide data on medical resource utilization and sick leave to assess socioeconomic costs.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Lleida, 25100, Spain
Upper extremity pathologies, particularly subacromial impingement syndrome (SAS) and carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), represent a significant clinical and socioeconomic burden for primary care systems, primarily due to functional disability and prolonged sick leave.
Although corticosteroid injections are frequently used, traditional blind injections guided by anatomical landmarks often lack anatomical precision. Point-of-care ultrasound-guided injections offer greater accuracy and better short-term clinical outcomes; however, their cost-effectiveness in routine clinical practice has not yet been adequately assessed.
This pragmatic, prospective, multicenter, cluster-randomized clinical trial includes 23 participating primary care centers (clusters) in Lleida, Spain, with a 6-month longitudinal follow-up. This study constitutes the quantitative phase of the mixed-methods Q-EPICAP project.
A total of 225 adult patients diagnosed with SAS or CTS and presenting with baseline pain (VAS ≥ 3) were divided into three parallel groups:
Data collection was performed at baseline and at 15, 30, 90, and 180 days post-intervention. The primary outcome measure was pain intensity (VAS). Secondary outcomes included upper limb function (ASES and Boston questionnaires), health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L), and a comprehensive economic evaluation (cost-effectiveness and cost-utility indices) that integrates the perspectives of healthcare systems and society.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Prescription of systemic oral pharmacological treatment according to standard clinical practice and guidelines, which may include individual or combined use of the following therapies, or no pharmacological prescription if deemed appropriate by the clinician:
Local infiltration consisting of a combination of a corticosteroid and a local anesthetic, administered in a 1:1 volume ratio (1 ml + 1 ml, total volume 2 ml):
In the Conventional Infiltration group, the solution is injected using the standard anatomical landmark technique (blind technique).
Local infiltration consisting of a combination of a corticosteroid and a local anesthetic, administered in a 1:1 volume ratio (1 ml + 1 ml, total volume 2 ml):
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), 3 months, 6 months, and 9 months post-intervention.
Pain intensity will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), where patients rate their pain on a line from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). The primary endpoint is the change in the score from baseline to 3, 6, and 9 months. Higher scores indicate greater pain intensity.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), 3, 6, and 9 months post-intervention.
The ASES score evaluates shoulder pain and activities of daily living. It consists of a patient-reported section (10 items) and a clinical assessment. The total score ranges from 0 to 100, where 100 indicates better shoulder function and less pain. We will assess the change in this score relative to baseline.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), 3, 6, and 9 months post-intervention.
The BCTQ consists of two scales: the Symptom Severity Scale (11 items) and the Functional Status Scale (8 items). Each item is scored from 1 (mildest) to 5 (most severe). The final score is the average of the responses. Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms and greater functional impairment.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), 3, 6, and 9 months post-intervention.
The EQ-5D-5L questionnaire assesses 5 dimensions of health (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) across 5 levels of severity. It also includes a Visual Analog Scale (EQ-VAS) from 0 (worst imaginable health) to 100 (best imaginable health). Higher index values and VAS scores represent better health status.
Fundacio d'Investigacio en Atencio Primaria Jordi Gol i Gurina
Other
Acronym: Q-EPICAP
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05071469
Joint Diseases, Muscle Weakness
Muğla, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT05057871
Arthralgia, Disease
Afyonkarahisar, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07601568
Joint Diseases, Musculoskeletal Diseases
Giza, Dokki, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT06778551
Behavior, Joint Diseases
Soria, Spain
View Trial Details