Gemcitabine
Drug◦ Gemcitabine 800 mg/mq iv, day 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles, for 3 cycles
NCT Number: NCT06037980
PURITY is a multicentre, randomized adaptive phase II/III trial aimed at comparing the triplet combination of gemcitabine, cisplatin and nabpaclitaxel as neoadjuvant treatment (ARM A) versus standard upfront surgery (ARM B) in terms of 12-month PFS rate (phase II part) and PFS (phase III part) in patients with resectable BTC at high risk for recurrence.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Ancona, Italy
PURITY is a multicentre, randomized adaptive phase II/III trial aimed at comparing the triplet combination of gemcitabine, cisplatin and nabpaclitaxel as neoadjuvant treatment (ARM A) versus standard upfront surgery (ARM B) in terms of 12-month PFS rate (phase II part) and PFS (phase III part) in patients with resectable BTC at high risk for recurrence.
High risk for recurrence, for which patients will be eligible for study, is defined by the presence of at least one of the following risk features, as evaluated at baseline (pre-surgery):
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
◦ Gemcitabine 800 mg/mq iv, day 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles, for 3 cycles
◦ Nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/mq, day 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles, for 3 cycles
Other names: Abraxane
◦ Cisplatin 25 mg/mq iv, day 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles, for 3 cycles
Curative surgery on primary tumor
1250 mg/m2 given orally twice daily on days 1 to 14 of a 3 weekly cycle for a total of 8 cycles
Time frame: 12 months
the proportion of patients alive and free from progression/post-resection recurrence by 12-months timepoint from randomization (to be considered as primary endpoint in the phase II part of the study and as secondary endpoint in the phase III part of the study).
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression (as assessed by radiological evaluation and clinical examination) or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 120 months
i.e. the time from randomization to disease progression, post-resection recurrence or death from any cause (to be considered as secondary endpoint in the phase II part of the study and as primary endpoint in the phase III part of the study).
Time frame: from date of randomization to disease progression that precludes definitive surgery, treatment discontinuation for any reason, post-resection recurrence, diagnosis of second cancer, or death from any cause, assessed up to 120 months
i.e. the time from randomization to disease progression that precludes definitive surgery, treatment discontinuation for any reason, post-resection recurrence, a second primary cancer, or death from any cause.
Time frame: from date of surgery to date of disease recurrence or date of death, whichever came first, in patients who undergo surgery with curative intent, assessed up to 120 months.
i.e. the time from surgery to disease recurrence or death in patients who undergo to surgery with curative intent.
Time frame: from date of randomization to date of death (or last follow up for alive patients), assessed up to 120 months.
i.e. the time from randomization to death or last follow-up for alive patients.
Time frame: At surgery
i.e. the percentage of patients, relative to the total of randomized patients, for whom a R0 resection is achieved.
Time frame: At surgery
i.e. the percentage of patients, relative to the total of randomized patients, for whom the tumor was macroscopically removed and the intent of surgery is considered curative.
Time frame: Quality of life questionnaires will be compiled during screening (28 days before randomisation) and at restaging before (week 8 to 10 after randomisation) and after surgery (week 6 to 16 after surgery)
QoL will be estimated with EORTC QLQ-C30; mean score changes from baseline, proportion of patients with improved, stable, or deteriorated scores from baseline and time to deterioration in the EORTC QLQ-C30 scores will be compared between the two arms. Time to deterioration will be defined as the time from baseline to the first onset of a 10-point or greater decrease (for functional scales)/increase (for symptoms scale) from baseline, with confirmation under the right-censoring rule. All available observations will be used to calculate time to deterioration.
Time frame: Quality of life questionnaires will be compiled during screening (28 days before randomisation) and at restaging before (week 8 to 10 after randomisation) and after surgery (week 6 to 16 after surgery)
QoL will be estimated with the module BIL21; mean score changes from baseline, proportion of patients with improved, stable, or deteriorated scores from baseline and time to deterioration in the BIL21 physical functioning, social functioning, and fatigue scores will be compared between the two arms. Time to deterioration was defined as the time from baseline to the first onset of a 10-point or greater decrease from baseline for functional scales or a 10-point or greater increase for symptom scales, with confirmation under the right-censoring rule. All available observations will be used to calculate time to deterioration.
Time frame: At radiological evaluation as performed at restaging before surgery (week 8 to 10 after randomisation)
of neoadjuvant therapy as per investigator assessment and central review, i.e. the percentage of patients, relative to the total of enrolled subjects receiving neoadjuvant treatment, achieving a complete (CR) or partial (PR) response, according to RECIST 1.1 criteria.
Time frame: Resectability rate will be assessed before surgery (after the 3 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for the experimental treatment arm)
i.e. the retrospective evaluation of patients with unresectable disease, as assessed by the central review committee, in the two arms, and of the rate of conversion to resectability in the neoadjuvant arm.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year for each patient
.e. the percentage of patients, relative to the total of subjects randomized to neoadjuvant treatment, experiencing a specific adverse event, according to National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (version 5.0).
Time frame: At surgery
i.e. the percentage of patients, relative to the total of enrolled subjects undergoing surgery, with any serious perioperative morbidity or mortality according to Clavien-Dindo classification.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Federico Nichetti, MD
CONTACT
Monica Niger, MD
CONTACT
Gruppo Oncologico del Nord-Ovest
Other
A Phase II/III Randomized Clinical Trial of CisPlatin plUs Gemcitabine and Nabpaclitaxel (GAP) as pReoperative Chemotherapy Versus Immediate Resection in patIents With resecTable BiliarY Tract Cancers (BTC) at High Risk for Recurrence: PURITY Study
Acronym: PURITY
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07641036
Adenocarcinoma, Biliary Tract Cancer
Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
View Trial DetailsNCT06648057
Adenocarcinoma, Biliary Tract Cancer
Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea
View Trial DetailsNCT07146646
Adenocarcinoma, Biliary Tract Cancer
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06546969
Adenocarcinoma, Biliary Tract Cancer
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
View Trial Details