Capecitabine
DrugGiven PO
Other names: Xeloda, ACH-Capecitabine, Mint-Capecitabine, SANDOZ Capecitabine, TARO-Capecitabine, EVA-Capecitabine
NCT Number: NCT02595424
This randomized phase II trial studies how well temozolomide and capecitabine work compared to standard treatment with cisplatin or carboplatin and etoposide in treating patients with neuroendocrine carcinoma of the gastrointestinal tract or pancreas that has spread to other parts of the body (metastatic) or cannot be removed by surgery. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as temozolomide, capecitabine, cisplatin, carboplatin and etoposide, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Certain types of neuroendocrine carcinomas may respond better to treatments other than the current standard treatment of cisplatin and etoposide. It is not yet known whether temozolomide and capecitabine may work better than cisplatin or carboplatin and etoposide in treating patients with this type of neuroendocrine carcinoma, called non-small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Kingman Regional Medical Center, Kingman, Arizona, United States
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To assess the progression free survival (PFS) of platinum (cisplatin or carboplatin) and etoposide versus the PFS of temozolomide and capecitabine in patients with advanced G3 non-small cell gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To assess the response rate (RR) of platinum (cisplatin or carboplatin) and etoposide versus the RR of temozolomide and capecitabine in patients with advanced G3 non-small cell gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas.
II. To assess the overall survival (OS) of platinum (cisplatin or carboplatin) and etoposide versus the OS of temozolomide and capecitabine in patients with advanced G3 non-small cell gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas.
III. To evaluate the toxicities associated with the combination of temozolomide and capecitabine and the combination of platinum (cisplatin or carboplatin) and etoposide, respectively, in patients with advanced G3 non-small cell gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas.
TERTIARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To assess the impact of each treatment regimen on PFS, RR and OS based on marker of proliferation Ki-67 index in patients with advanced G3 non-small cell gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas. (Laboratory) II. To assess the prognostic significance of well differentiated versus poorly differentiated non-small cell gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in relationship to survival and response to treatment. (Laboratory) III. To assess the agreement in Ki-67 status between that reported by institutional pathologist and that reported by central pathology review. (Laboratory)
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
ARM A: Patients receive capecitabine orally (PO) twice daily (BID) on days 1-14 and temozolomide PO once daily (QD) on days 10-14. Courses repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
ARM B: Patients receive cisplatin intravenously (IV) on days 1-3 or carboplatin IV on day 1. Patients also receive etoposide IV on days 1-3. Courses repeat every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 3 months for 2 years and then every 6 months for 3 years.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Given PO
Other names: Xeloda, ACH-Capecitabine, Mint-Capecitabine, SANDOZ Capecitabine, TARO-Capecitabine, EVA-Capecitabine
Given IV
Other names: Paraplatin
Given IV
Other names: Platinol-AQ
Given IV
Other names: VP-16 or VP-16-213
Correlative studies
Other names: VePesid®
Given PO
Other names: Toposar®
Time frame: assessed at baseline, every 8 weeks until treatment completion, then every 3 months within 2 years and every 6 months within 3-5 years from randomization until disease progression, up to 5 years from study registration
PFS is defined as the time from randomization to documented progression or death without progression. PFS is censored at the date of last disease evaluation. The study was closed for futility in 2021 after the 2021 Spring DSMC meeting, which found that the boundary for futility had been met (ie, temozolomide and capecitabine did not appear to be superior to platinum and etoposide chemotherapy). As the interim analysis finding led to the conclusion of the study, no PFS stratified logrank test was conducted with the data extracted on April 23rd, 2025 for the final analysis, that was presented here.
Time frame: assessed at baseline, then every 3 months within 2 years from randomization, and every 6 months if patient is 3-5 years from randomization, up to 5 years from randomization
OS is defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause. OS is censored at the date of last contact. Median OS is estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: assessed at baseline, every 8 weeks until treatment completion, then every 3 months within 2 years and every 6 months within 3-5 years, up to 5 years from registration; the best response among all assessments was considered as objective response
ORR is defined as the proportion of patients with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). Response is evaluated using the RECIST 1.1 criteria. CR is defined as disappearance of all lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to < 10 mm. PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.
Time frame: assessed at baseline, every 8 weeks until treatment completion, then every 3 months within 2 years and every 6 months within 3-5 years, up to 5 years from registration; the best response among all assessments was considered as objective response
The impact of each treatment regimen on objective response rate (ORR, defined as above in the secondary objective) are assessed by Ki-67 index level as an exploratory analysis. Using Youden's index, which considers specificity and sensitivity equally important, the optimal cutoff point of Ki-67 index to best predict response is 50.5. Using the optimal Ki-67 cutoff value of 50.5 from the ROC analysis, patients were divided into Ki-67 low (Ki-67 < 50.5) and high (Ki-67 ≥ 50.5) groups. The impact of each treatment regimen on ORR was explored in Ki-67 low and Ki-67 high separately.
Time frame: assessed at baseline, every 8 weeks until treatment completion, then every 3 months within 2 years and every 6 months within 3-5 years from randomization until disease progression, up to 5 years from study registration
The impact of each treatment regimen on PFS and OS (defined as above in the primary and secondary objectives) are assessed by Ki-67 index level as an exploratory analysis. Using Youden's index, which considers specificity and sensitivity equally important, the optimal cutoff point of Ki-67 index to best predict response is 50.5. Using the optimal Ki-67 cutoff value of 50.5 from the ROC analysis, patients were divided into Ki-67 low (Ki-67 < 50.5) and high (Ki-67 ≥ 50.5) groups. The impact of each treatment regimen on PFS and OS were explored in Ki-67 low and Ki-67 high separately.
Time frame: assessed at baseline, every 8 weeks until treatment completion, then every 3 months within 2 years and every 6 months within 3-5 years from randomization until disease progression, up to 5 years from study registration
The association between tumor differentiation (well differentiated versus poorly differentiated) with PFS, ORR and OS (defined as in the primary and secondary objectives) were evaluated.
ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group
Network
Randomized Phase II Study of Cisplatin and Etoposide Versus Temozolomide and Capecitabine in Patients With Advanced Poorly Differentiated (G3) Non-Small Cell Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Carcinomas
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02834013
Acinar Cell Carcinoma, Adenocarcinoma
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05671393
Gastric Neuroendocrine Carcinoma
Fuzhou, Fujian, China
View Trial DetailsNCT05988918
Adenocarcinoma, Adenoma
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01365169
Adenocarcinoma, Carcinoma
Houston, Texas, United States
View Trial Details