Circulating tumor DNA monitoring
OtherMonitoring of circulating tumor DNA after 2 and 4 cycles of chemotherapy
NCT Number: NCT04824950
The purpose of this study is to compare the predictive value in terms of specificity of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and positron emission computed tomography (PET-CT) after 2 cycles of chemotherapy (C2), on the probability of obtaining a metabolic complete response after 4 cycles of induction chemotherapy (C4) in patients with primary mediastinal large B cell lymphoma (PMBL) receiving standard R-CHOP14 or R-ACVBP.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Lyon, France
The majority of studies with PMBL patients pinpoint the importance of being able to identify primary chemo refractory patients at an early stage, in order to be able to improve their prognosis. Indeed, a biomarker such as circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) monitoring would be of great help to better assess the therapeutic response and offer an individualized care given the frequent positive residual uptake of the mediastinum at end of treatment. Indeed, ctDNA can be detected with Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS).
The hypothesis of this study is that it would be helpful to prospectively compare the predictive value of ctDNA versus PET on the capacity to detect primary refractory patients after 2 or 4 cycles of first line chemotherapy.
To date, there are no prospective studies reporting the evolution of the tumor clone under treatment or after obtaining complete remission in PMBL. The establishment of this prospective, multicenter, ambitious and original pilot project will make it possible to structure the analysis of tumor DNA circulating within these centers caring for patients with lymphomas within LYSA group.
The notion of minimal residual disease (MRD) has shown its interest in follicular lymphomas and mantle cell lymphomas. The level of sensitivity of NGS-type approaches on the one hand and the informativeness of the recurrent mutations recently described on the other hand constitute two elements for reconsidering the problem of MRD in PMBLs. Molecular MRD by analysis of circulating tumor DNA could constitute a new marker for monitoring response to treatment in addition to PET-CT and be useful as a tool for non-invasive tumor sequencing at diagnosis and at relapse, in order to to determine the eligibility for possible targeted therapies (based on the inactivation of mutated genes) or immunotherapies.
This study will evaluate the prognostic value of obtaining a quantified complete molecular response (RMC) by analysis of free circulating DNA (ctDNA) after 2 and 4 cycles of first-line chemotherapy (C2 and C4) for the treatment of PMBL, and that of positron emission computed tomography (PET) performed at the same time, on overall survival and progression-free survival.
The investigators will describe 3 different populations of patients included in the study:
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Monitoring of circulating tumor DNA after 2 and 4 cycles of chemotherapy
Time frame: 4 months
specificity of ctDNA at Cycle 2 of chemotherapy on the prediction of achieving a complete metabolic response (determined by PET-CT scan) at cycle 4 of chemotherapy
Time frame: at the end of first line treatment
Proportion of patient in complete metabolic response at the end of first line treatment
Time frame: At the end of 4 cycles of chemotherapy
Percentage of patients in complete metabolic response, partial metabolic response, stable disease or pregression after 4 cycles of chemotherapy
Time frame: At the end of treatment
Percentage of patients in complete metabolic response, partial metabolic response, stable disease or pregression at the end of treatment
Time frame: 3 years
Time between death and inclusion
Time frame: 3 years
Lenght of time after the end of tratment and events like progression, lake of response, relapse of death whatever the cause
Time frame: 3 years
Next-Generation-sequencing on diagnostic biopsy
Time frame: 3 years
Determination of molecular profile and evaluation of pronostic impact
Time frame: 3 years
Comparison between the result of Next generation Sequencing and the molocular profile obtained on circulation tumor DNA of each patient
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
RICHARD DORIANE, PhD
CONTACT
VINCENT CAMUS, MD
CONTACT
Centre Henri Becquerel
Other
Acronym: CAMIL
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07097363
B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, Burkitt Lymphoma
Seattle, Washington, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04231877
ALK-Positive Large B-Cell Lymphoma, Aggressive Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
Seattle, Washington, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06550141
Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma, Follicular Lymphoma
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06784167
Blood Protein Disorders, Cardiovascular Diseases
Portland, Oregon, United States
View Trial Details