Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07479225

Circulating Cell-Free DNA for Brain Abscess Diagnosis: A Pilot Study

Brain abscess is a severe intracranial infection associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Standard management combines neurosurgical intervention, when feasible, with prolonged intravenous antibiotic therapy. Neurosurgical procedures, such as surgical drainage or stereotactic aspiration, play a key role in reducing intracranial pressure, decreasing the infectious burden, and obtaining samples for microbiological identification.

However, neurosurgical intervention is not always possible due to technical limitations or patien related contrindications. In these situations, microbiological documentation becomes particularly challenging. Conventional diagnostic methods have limited sensitivity, with blood cultures and lumbar puncture yielding positive results in only about 25% of brain abscess cases.

Recent advances in infectious disease diagnostics have introduced metagenomic approaches that may improve pathogen detection. Studies have shown that metagenomic analysis of operative samples can provide more comprehensive microbiological documentation than conventional culture-based methods. In addition, next-generation sequencing (NGS) of circulating microbial cell-free DNA in blood enables the detection of short microbial DNA fragments with a short half-life, reflecting active infection. This technology has already demonstrated promising results in clinical situations where microbiological documentation is difficult, such as febrile neutropenia. The present study aims to evaluate the performance of this approach in patients with brain abscess.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

CHU de Grenoble Alpes, Laboratoire de bactériologie, Grenoble, France

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Brain abscess is a rare but severe intracranial infection, with an estimated incidence of approximately 0.8 cases per 100,000 individuals and a reported mortality rate ranging from 10% to 20%. Current management relies on a combination of neurosurgical intervention and prolonged intravenous antimicrobial therapy. When feasible, surgical drainage or stereotactic aspiration is performed to reduce intracranial pressure, decrease the infectious burden, and obtain biological samples for microbiological identification of the causative pathogen, enabling targeted antimicrobial treatment.

However, neurosurgical intervention is not always feasible. Technical factors such as small abscess size or deep anatomical location may prevent access to the lesion, and some patients may present contraindications to neurosurgical procedures. In these situations, microbiological documentation becomes particularly challenging. Conventional diagnostic methods, including blood cultures and cerebrospinal fluid analysis, have limited sensitivity in brain abscess and frequently fail to identify the causative pathogen.

Recent advances in molecular diagnostics have led to the development of metagenomic sequencing approaches for pathogen detection. Metagenomic analysis enables the unbiased identification of microbial DNA directly from clinical samples and may provide broader pathogen detection than traditional culture-based techniques. In neurosurgical infections, metagenomic sequencing performed on operative samples has shown promising results and may improve microbiological documentation compared with standard diagnostic methods.

In parallel, sequencing of circulating microbial cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in peripheral blood using next-generation sequencing represents an innovative and minimally invasive diagnostic approach. This technology detects short fragments of microbial DNA released into the bloodstream during active infection and may provide clinically relevant diagnostic information.

This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance of circulating microbial cfDNA metagenomic sequencing in patients with brain abscess and to compare its performance with metagenomic sequencing and conventional microbiological cultures performed on intraoperative samples when available.

This pilot study is designed to provide proof-of-concept data on the diagnostic performance of circulating microbial cfDNA sequencing in brain abscess. The results may help define the role of this diagnostic approach in improving microbiological documentation and guiding targeted antimicrobial therapy, particularly when neurosurgical sampling is not feasible.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Participant ≥ 18 years of age.
  • Participant presenting with a brain abscess requiring neurosurgical
  • Signed Informed Consent
  • Covered by health insurance

Exclusion criteria

  • Participant in exclusion period for another study
  • Participant referred to in articles L1121-5 to L1121-8 of the CSP (corresponding to all protected persons : pregnant woman, parturient, breastfeeding mother, person deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision, persons undergoing psychiatric care under articles L.3212-1 and L.3213-1 who do not fall under article L.1121-8, persons admitted to a healthcare or social institution for purposes other than research, minors, person under legal protection or unable to express consent).
  • Staff members with a hierarchical relationship to the principal investigator

Treatment and study plan

Plasma Microbial Cell-Free DNA Metagenomic Sequencing

Diagnostic Test

A 20 mL peripheral blood sample will be collected prior to neurosurgical intervention for metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) analysis of circulating microbial cell-free DNA. Results will be compared with metagenomic analysis and conventional culture of intraoperative brain abscess specimens, which serve as the reference standard for microbiological identification.

Primary outcomes

  1. Blood and Brain Abscess Metagenomic Concordance

    Time frame: Day 0

    Comparison of bacterial species identified by metagenomic next-generation sequencing of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from blood samples versus metagenomic analysis of per-operative brain abscess samples.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing vs. Culture Concordance

    Time frame: Day 0

    Evaluation of bacterial species identification using metagenomic next-generation sequencing compared to gold-standard culture techniques on per-operative brain abscess samples.

  2. Plasma Cell-Free DNA vs. Abscess Culture Correlation

    Time frame: Day 0

    Comparison of bacterial species identified by metagenomic analysis of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from blood samples versus species identified by conventional culture of per-operative brain abscess samples.

  3. Potential Clinical Impact on Antimicrobial Treatment

    Time frame: At 1 Month

    Assessment of potential therapeutic modifications or antibiotic optimization induced by metagenomic next-generation sequencing results compared to standard culture-based diagnosis.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Marion LE MARECHAL, MD,PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

04 76 76 52 91

Saber touati, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

04 76 76 58 05

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Grenoble

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Assessment of Circulating Cell-Free DNA for the Microbiological Diagnosis of Brain Abscesses: A Pilot Proof-of-Concept Study

Acronym: METABCES-PoC

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2028
Study completion
2028
First posted
Mar 18, 2026
Registry last updated
Mar 18, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.