Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05101707

CIMT and taVNS for Hemiplegia in Infants

Newborns who are born premature or suffer brain injury at birth are at risk for motor problems that may cause weakness in reaching and grasping on one side of the body. In older children, therapists may use a hand mitt and restraint for the stronger arm, to encourage use of the weaker side, called constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT). Even with the high intensity therapy of CIMT, it typically takes between 40-120 hours total treatment time for most children to improve their motor skills. A non-invasive form of nerve stimulation, transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS), stimulates a nerve by the ear that enhances learning motor skills. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of taVNS to improve motor skills when paired with CIMT in infants with one-sided weakness at 6-18months of age.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

6 month–18 month

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Early Phase 1

Primary location

Medical University of South Carolina

Charleston, South Carolina, 29425, United States

About this study

Recent pioneering studies have used neuromodulation combined with intensive motor therapies in adults after stroke. Few studies have investigated combining neuromodulation and evidence-based pediatric intensive therapies such as CIMT, and then only in older children with CP to enhance neuroplasticity and improve functional outcomes. The investigators are the first to use non-invasive transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) paired with a motor task of bottle-feeding in infants with feeding failure. taVNS paired with motor feeding activity was safe and over 50% infants attained full oral feeds who were slated to receive a gastrostomy tube (G-tube). With the unique collaboration of experts in brain stimulation, pediatric translational clinical science and pediatric occupational therapy in this pilot project, the investigators propose to expand the paradigm of pairing neuromodulation with motor training in at-risk infants by exploring the safety, feasibility, and effectiveness of delivering taVNS concurrently with CIMT. The hypothesis is that combining taVNS with intensive CIMT may boost neuroplasticity, allowing for delivery of infant therapy at a minimally effective dosage while improving infant outcomes.

The investigators aim to determine the feasibility and safety of taVNS in at-risk infants 6-18mo undergoing CIMT therapy in open label pilot trial and assess both infant tolerability and the therapist's ability to deliver high-quality CIMT along with taVNS.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Must have all of the following:

  • 6-18 month-old infants with hemiplegia/motor asymmetry
  • Must be able to participate in high intensity CIMT
  • Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) level I-IV

Exclusion criteria

Must have none of the following:

  • GMFCS level V
  • severe motor impairment/quadriplegic involvement
  • uncorrected blindness or deafness
  • cardiomyopathy

Treatment and study plan

Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation

Device

Applying a pulsed microcurrent to the auricular branch of the vagus nerve, timed with motor activity of the weaker arm/hand

Other names: taVNS

Constraint induced movement therapy

Other

Applying a custom-made splint constraint to the stronger hand/arm to encourage use of the weaker hand/arm in intensive therapy sessions

Other names: CIMT

Primary outcomes

  1. CIMT Fidelity

    Time frame: at 1 month

    Feasibility of delivering high fidelity CIMT therapy sessions while the therapist is also triggering taVNS using the Fidelity of Implementation Measure (FIRM) with scoring range (0-4), higher scores indicate greater consistency of therapy with established CIMT procedure

  2. Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test (QUEST), GRASP

    Time frame: 1 month

    change in test of hand function and quality of movement between the right and left sides of the body, scoring range 0-100, higher scores indicate better hand function; from baseline to end of treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Gross Motor Function Measure-88 (GMFM-88)

    Time frame: 1 month

    The Gross Motor Function Measure-88 (GMFM-88) assessment tool includes 88 items, each receiving a score from 0 to 3 (0 = does not initiate; 1 = initiates; 2 = partially completes; 3 = completes). Items span the spectrum of gross motor activities in five dimensions: A: Lying and Rolling (17 items), B: Sitting (20 items), C: Crawling and Kneeling (14 items), D: Standing (13 items), E: Walking, Running, Jumping (24 items). Every dimension score is expressed with a percentage. All dimension scores are then averaged to a total GMFM-88 percentage score, which is an estimate of the participant's gross motor function (0 = low motor function; 100 = high motor function).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Medical University of South Carolina

Other

Collaborators

  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
  • National Center of Neuromodulation for Rehabilitation
  • National Institutes of Health (NIH)

Registry information

Official study title

Combining taVNS With Early CIMT to Improve Health Outcomes of Infants With Unilateral Upper Extremity Weakness

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
Nov 1, 2021
Registry last updated
Jun 13, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.