chronOS Inject
DevicechronOS Inject is used as bone void filler in internal fixation of proximal tibial fractures
NCT Number: NCT02056834
The primary objective of this study is to observe the safety, the radiological and clinical outcomes of chronOS Inject after having been used as bone void filler in internal fixation of proximal tibial fractures.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, South Korea
The primary objective of this study was to observe the safety, the radiological and clinical outcomes of chronOS Inject after having been used as bone void filler in internal fixation of proximal tibial fractures. Secondary objectives were to assess the surgeon's satisfaction in using chronOS Inject and patient satisfaction post surgery.
The study was planned to be a multi-center, prospective, observational study. Patients with proximal tibial fractures of type Schatzker I - VI, AO-Müller-Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO-OTA) 41, AO-OTA 42 with bone defect were assessed for eligibility to enter the study. Patients eligible for the study were followed over time to twelve months after surgery.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
chronOS Inject is used as bone void filler in internal fixation of proximal tibial fractures
Time frame: 12 months
Fracture union (complete bone healing) was assessed by the investigators based on anteroposterior and lateral X-rays
Time frame: 12 months
Evidence of articular subsidence (collapse of surface pertaining to the joint) of ≥2 mm was assessed by the investigators
Time frame: 12 months
Mean time to union was calculated based on the Kaplan-Meier estimator of the survivorship function
Time frame: 12 months
Absorption of calcium phosphate cement over time was calculated from X-rays with the INFINITT program.
Time frame: 12 months
Time frame: 12 months
Time frame: 12 months
The following was assessed:
Time frame: 12 months
Satisfaction with treatment was assessed by the subjects, where subjects indicated their satisfaction with treatment on a 100-mm visual analog scale. A score of zero indicated no satisfaction, while a score of 100 indicated completely satisfied.
Time frame: Post-surgery
Satisfaction with product was assessed by the surgeon post-operatively, where surgeons indicated their satisfaction with treatment on a 100-mm visual analog scale. A score of zero indicated absolutely unacceptable, while a score of 100 indicated very satisfying.
Time frame: 12 months
The following was assessed:
Time frame: 12 months
Time frame: 12 months
The SF-12 short form health survey was self-administered to subjects preoperatively and all follow up visits. This health survey comprises 12 questions related to health and wellbeing over the prior four weeks. The responses to these 12 questions are entered into a standardized algorithm to provide summaries of physical and mental health (i.e., physical composite score [PCS] and mental composite score [MCS]). The summary scores are standardized and normalized such that a score of 50 for either the PCS or MCS corresponds to that of an average, healthy person. A score lower than 50 indicates poorer physical and mental health compared to an average, healthy person.
Time frame: 12 months
The SF-12 short form health survey was self-administered to subjects preoperatively and at follow up visits. This health survey comprises 12 questions related to health and wellbeing over the prior four weeks. The responses to these 12 questions are entered into a standardized algorithm to provide summaries of physical and mental health (i.e., physical composite score [PCS] and mental composite score [MCS]). The summary scores are standardized and normalized such that a score of 50 for either the PCS or MCS corresponds to that of an average, healthy person. A score lower than 50 indicates poorer physical and mental health compared to an average, healthy person.
Time frame: 12 months
The subjects completed questionnaires assessing the intensity and frequency of pain experienced in the leg at the baseline visit and postoperatively. Pain intensity was rated on a 100-mm visual analog scale where zero indicated no pain at all, and 100 represented the worst possible pain.
Time frame: 12 months
The subjects completed questionnaires assessing the intensity and frequency of pain experienced in the leg at the baseline visit and postoperatively. Pain frequency was rated on a 100-mm visual analog scale where zero indicated no pain at all and 100 represented pain always.
Time frame: 12 months
The Lysholm knee scale is a condition-specific outcome measure that was originally designed to assess ligament injuries of the knee. The survey was administered to subject at follow-up visits and comprises 8 subscales related to limp, support, stair climbing, squatting, walking, running and jumping as well as a question related to the atrophy of the thigh. The responses to these 8 questions are graded to provide a maximum result of 100 points.
Synthes GmbH
Industry
Prospective, Multi-Center, Observational Study Evaluating the Augmentation With Calcium Phosphate Cement (chronOS Inject) for Bone Defect After Internal Fixation of Proximal Tibial Fractures
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.