Back on Track intervention
OtherA biopsychosocial primary care intervention based on multidisciplinary pain rehabilitation programs. The Back on Track intervention comprises 4 individual sessions and 8 group sessions.
NCT Number: NCT02245919
Up to now, only little research has been performed in tailoring treatment of patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). It would be interesting to evaluate a biopsychosocial intervention in patients with a moderate to high level of disability and in whom the contributing role of psychosocial factors to this disability is mild to moderate (WPN3-). Nowadays, these patients receive cognitive behavioral-based treatments in multidisciplinary rehabilitation settings but might also benefit from treatments based on these multidisciplinary rehabilitation treatment principles when provided by specifically trained primary care physical therapists. Therefore, the aims of this pilot-study are to evaluate the feasibility of a specifically for primary care physiotherapist developed biopsychosocial intervention ("Back on Track" intervention) in WPN3- classified patients, and to evaluate whether this "Back on Track" intervention results in a significant improvement in functional disability in this subgroup of patients.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Fysiotherapie Abbink, Bunde, Limburg, Netherlands
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
A biopsychosocial primary care intervention based on multidisciplinary pain rehabilitation programs. The Back on Track intervention comprises 4 individual sessions and 8 group sessions.
Time frame: Change in functional disability between pre-treatment (baseline) and post-treatment (with an expected average of 8 weeks), 3 months follow-up and 12 months follow-up
The QBPDS is a 20-itemed questionnaire designed to determine the individuals' functional disability level (ranging from 0-100). A higher score reflects higher disability.
Time frame: Directly after the first treatment (in the first week of the intervention)
Time frame: Change in quality of life between pre-treatment (baseline) and post-treatment (with an expected average of 8 weeks), 3 months follow-up and 12 months follow-up
Time frame: Change in anxiety and depression between pre-treatment (baseline) and post-treatment (with an expected average of 8 weeks), 3 months follow-up and 12 months follow-up
Time frame: Change in catastrophizing between pre-treatment (baseline) and post-treatment (with an expected average of 8 weeks), 3 months follow-up and 12 months follow-up
Time frame: Change in catastrophizing between pre-treatment (baseline) and post-treatment (with an expected average of 8 weeks), 3 months follow-up and 12 months follow-up
Time frame: Change in kinesiophobia between pre-treatment (baseline) and post-treatment (with an expected average of 8 weeks), 3 months follow-up and 12 months follow-up
Time frame: Global perceived effect at post-treatment (with an expected average of 8 weeks), 3 months follow-up and 12 months follow-up
Time frame: Medical consumption at pre-treatment (baseline), post-treatment (with an expected average of 8 weeks), 3 months follow-up and 12 months follow-up
Time frame: pre-treatment (baseline)
Time frame: post-treatment (with an expected average of 8 weeks)
This questionnaire will include questions about the patient's opinion regarding the intervention, the workbook, the consultant in rehabilitation medicine, the therapist(s), and the patient's perceived knowledge
Time frame: Change in self-efficacy between pre-treatment (baseline) and post-treatment (with an expected average of 8 weeks), 3 months follow-up and 12 months follow-up
Time frame: All therapy sessions of the Back on Track intervention will be audio recorded (the intervention period of the trial will last approximately one year and 3 months)
Physiotherapists will audio record all therapy sessions. A random sample will be assessed for protocol adherence using a modified version of the protocol used by Leeuw et al (2009). This protocol includes essential treatment elements and raters will judge whether these essential treatments elements are provided during the therapy or not. Adherence will be regarded sufficient in case a percentage of 70% of the required treatment elements are provided during the treatment.
Maastricht University Medical Center
Other
A Primary Care Biopsychosocial Intervention (Back on Track) for Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain in Which Psychosocial Factors Moderately Influence Daily Life Functioning: a Pilot Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06810245
Agnosia, Arthritis
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04747314
Anxiety Disorders, Back Pain
Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02724930
Back Pain, Chronic Low Back Pain
Menlo Park, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01685684
Back Pain, Chronic Low Back Pain
Mesa, Arizona, United States
View Trial Details