CHU de Saint-Etienne
Saint-Etienne, 42000, France
NCT Number: NCT04857710
Neuromuscular electrostimulation (NMES) is a technique used in the clinical and training fields to increase the strength of a muscle group.The recent use of wide-pulse (WP) stimulations allows, in addition to the direct activation of the muscle fibers, the use of sensory pathways. This more global solicitation of the neuromuscular system (i.e. information going back to the spinal cord and even to the brain) prejudges more nervous adaptations and therefore a greater functional benefit. The first aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the force gains induced by 2 NMES training programs (CONV, WP) applied on knee extensors in healthy subjects for 6 weeks.The second aim is to understand the neuromuscular adaptations involved in these gains, as well as the functional benefit resulting from these improvements.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–50 year
Male
Interventional
Not applicable
Saint-Etienne, 42000, France
Neuromuscular electrostimulation (NMES) is a technique used in the clinical and training fields to increase the strength of a muscle group. The conventional (CONV) parameters of NMES induces a direct activation of the muscle fibers located close to the stimulation electrodes. This means that the neuromuscular system is not fully solicited, which limits its adaptation. The recent use of wide-pulse (WP) stimulations allows, in addition to the direct activation of the muscle fibers, the use of sensory pathways. This more global solicitation of the neuromuscular system (i.e. information going back to the spinal cord and even to the brain) prejudges more nervous adaptations and therefore a greater functional benefit.
The first aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the force gains induced by 2 NMES training programs (CONV, WP) applied on knee extensors in healthy subjects for 6 weeks. The second aim is to understand the neuromuscular adaptations involved in these gains, as well as the functional benefit resulting from these improvements. To consolidate the benefit of NMES programs, a control (CONT) modality is used as a reference and is representative of a sedentary behaviour regularly observed in our populations. The CONV modality allows us to compare with the current clinical application and the majority of the literature on the adaptations induced by NMES training. Finally, the WP modality aims to assess the possible benefits linked to the use of wide-pulses during the application of NMES. A clinical transfer will then be envisaged to confirm the interest and benefits of this type of program. We hypothesise that nervous adaptations will be increased by the use of WP NMES, leading to greater gains in strength and functional benefits than with CONV NMES.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The WP NMES program consists of electrical stimulation trains of 1000 symmetrical biphasic pulses (1 ms, 100 Hz). The duration of a train is of 10 s and the rest between trains is of 30 s. A WP NMES session includes 30 evoked contractions. The stimulation intensity is monitored online and adjusted to the highest tolerable by the subjects.During the stimulation, subjects are seated with the knee joint fixed a 60° angle. Three self-adhesive electrodes are placed over the right thigh. The positive electrodes, measuring 25 cm² (5 x 5 cm), are placed as close as possible to the motor point of the vastus lateralis and vastus medialis muscles. The negative electrode, measuring 50 cm² (10 x 5 cm), is placed 5-7 cm below the inguinal ligament. Electrical stimulations are delivered by a stimulator BioStim (Mazet Santé).
The CONV NMES program consists of electrical stimulation trains of 500 symmetrical biphasic pulses (0.2 ms, 50 Hz). The duration of a train is of 10 s and the rest between trains is of 30 s (duty cycle: 1/3). A WP NMES session includes 30 evoked contractions. The stimulation intensity is monitored online and adjusted to the highest tolerable by the subjects.
During the stimulation, subjects are seated with the knee joint fixed a 60° angle. Three self-adhesive electrodes are placed over the right thigh. The positive electrodes, measuring 25 cm² (5 x 5 cm), are placed as close as possible to the motor point of the vastus lateralis and vastus medialis muscles. The negative electrode, measuring 50 cm² (10 x 5 cm), is placed 5-7 cm below the inguinal ligament. Electrical stimulations are delivered by a stimulator BioStim (Mazet Santé).
Control (CONT) modality is used as a reference and is representative of a sedentary behaviour regularly observed in our populations.
Time frame: week 6
Maximal isometric force (maximal voluntary contraction, MVC) of the knee extensor muscle
Time frame: week 6
The level of voluntary activation will be determined by the force increment obtained following stimulation performed during a condition of the muscle in a state of maximum contraction.
Time frame: week 12
The level of voluntary activation will be determined by the force increment obtained following stimulation performed during a condition of the muscle in a state of maximum contraction.
Time frame: week 6
The quantification of cortico-spinal excitability (i.e. motor evoked potentials, in mV) will be evaluated by recording the electromyographic responses (surface EMG) evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation
Time frame: week 12
The quantification of cortico-spinal excitability (i.e. motor evoked potentials, in mV) will be evaluated by recording the electromyographic responses (surface EMG) evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation
Time frame: week 6
The quantification of spinal excitability (i.e. spinal reflex, in mV) will be evaluated by recording the EMG responses evoked by electrical stimulation in the lumbar vertebrae.
The quantification of spinal excitability (i.e. spinal reflex, in mV) will be evaluated by recording the EMG responses evoked by electrical stimulation in the lumbar vertebrae.
Time frame: week 12
The quantification of spinal excitability (i.e. spinal reflex, in mV) will be evaluated by recording the EMG responses evoked by electrical stimulation in the lumbar vertebrae.
The quantification of spinal excitability (i.e. spinal reflex, in mV) will be evaluated by recording the EMG responses evoked by electrical stimulation in the lumbar vertebrae.
Time frame: week 6
Muscle endurance (number of contractions performed before failure) will be assessed during a fatigue protocol consisting of performing quadriceps muscle contractions at incremental strength levels.
Time frame: week 12
Muscle endurance (number of contractions performed before failure) will be assessed during a fatigue protocol consisting of performing quadriceps muscle contractions at incremental strength levels.
Time frame: week 6
The performance of jumps (height, in cm; length, in cm) will be evaluated during various tests of vertical (Squat Jump and Counter Movement Jump) and horizontal (Single Hop and Triple Hop) jumps.
Time frame: week 12
The performance of jumps (height, in cm; length, in cm) will be evaluated during various tests of vertical (Squat Jump and Counter Movement Jump) and horizontal (Single Hop and Triple Hop) jumps.
Time frame: week 6
The postural balance performance (displacement of the center of pressure, in mm) will be evaluated during a unipodal postural balance test performed on a force platform.
Time frame: week 12
The postural balance performance (displacement of the center of pressure, in mm) will be evaluated during a unipodal postural balance test performed on a force platform.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne
Other
Acronym: ELECTRO-WP
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05447078
Healthy Volunteers, Infections
Jackson, Mississippi, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07513532
Healthy Volunteers
Seattle, Washington, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07090655
Healthy Volunteers
Brisbane, Australia
View Trial DetailsNCT01915212
Communicable Diseases, DNA Virus Infections
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial Details