Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01321125

Chlorhexidine Against Sodium Hypochlorite as Skin Antiseptics

The physicians have few options for skin antisepsis. Alternatives for common use antiseptics are costly or ineffective. In order to have more options, this study is needed. The investigators want to know if there are differences between the use of 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol or 10% sodium hypochlorite.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–70 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

University of Guanajuato School of Medicine

León, Guanajuato, 37000, Mexico

About this study

Sodium hypochlorite at 10% has been widely used as antiseptic in patients on dialysis as well as for irrigation of wounds and burns. Since it has been used successfully in caring for the exit side of hemodialysis catheters, it is reasonable to propose its use for the insertion and care of central intravascular catheters, as well as for skin preparation before surgery. Alternatives for povidone-iodine, which is the agent most commonly used, are costly or ineffective. In a recent study perform by our group it was demonstrated that 10% sodium hypochlorite was not inferior than povidone-iodine.

It has been demonstrated as well that 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol is superior to povidone-iodine. The aim of this study is to know if 10% sodium hypochlorite has a similar effect that the best current option for skin antisepsis.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Healthy adult volunteers

Exclusion criteria

  • History of skin allergies or atopy, as well as reactions to soaps, chlorine or latex

Treatment and study plan

Bacterial culture of the prepared skin's areas

Biological

Cultures were taken with a scrub-cup of 5cm2 of internal area pressed over the skin previously prepared, then it was added a 3mL of culture broth (C/E neutralizing broth (D/E Neutralizing Broth, DIFCO TM) containing a neutralizing agent and a detergent agent (1% solution tween-80) as washing solution. The skin was scrub with a sterile rubber policeman for 2 minutes, and the procedure was conducted once again. Both aliquots were gathered together in a sterile tube, and a sample of 50mL was spread in a plate containing a neutralizing agar (D/E neutralizing Agar, DIFCO TM) and incubated at 35°C for 72 hrs. After incubation, the colonies were counted.

Other names: Neutralizing agar, Neutralizing broth

Preparing skin's areas to be tested

Other

Two antiseptics (2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol and 10% sodium hypochlorite) and two controls were tested as skin antiseptics. The intervention consisted of preparing four skin's areas with the antiseptic or the control, two in each arm of the volunteer. These ones were approximately 25cm2 on the forearm for each antiseptic or control. The antiseptic or control were applied in an outward circular motion using a swab that was soaked with the solution. The solution was kept on the skin for 60 seconds before the bacterial culture was conducted. Every volunteer were studied in three separate occasions, alternating the four areas in every subsequent test, so every area was studied with each control or antiseptic.

Other names: Chloraprep (R), Except (R)

Antiseptic substantivity

Biological

Three antiseptics will be tested: 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol, 10% sodium hypochlorite and 10% povidone-iodine, each one will be applied on the surface of one fingertip each, and will be allow to dry for 60 seconds, then the remaining antiseptic on the skin will be wash out with distilled water. The evaluated zones will be dried with sterile gauze, and then will be covered with sterile gauze for two hours. After this period, each finger will be placed for 30 seconds on an agar plate, which will be inoculated whit an ATCC E. coli. The plate will be incubated at 35ºC for 72 hrs. After incubation, a blinded technician will report the presence or absence of bacterial growth

Other names: 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol (ChloraPrep ®, Enturia, Texas, USA ), hypochlorite 10% of electrochemical production (Except 10% ®, Pisa, Guadalajara, Mexico), 10% povidone-iodine (Isodine Solucion ®, Boehringer-Ingelheim Promeco, Mexico City), Muller Hinton agar plate (BD/BBL ™, México City, México).

Primary outcomes

  1. Comparison of the efficacy of 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol and 10% sodium hypochlorite

    Time frame: 24 hours

    Compare decrease in colony forming units in cultures of samples taken with both antiseptics

Secondary outcomes

  1. Presence of skin reactions for the 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol

    Time frame: 24 hours

    Presence of allergy or any reaction at 24 hours after the antiseptic application.

  2. Presence of allergy or any reaction at 24 hours after the antiseptic application.

    Time frame: 24 hours

    Presence of allergy or any reaction at 24 hours after the antiseptic application.

  3. Bacterial count of skin cultures for the 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol

    Time frame: 24 hours

    Bacterial colony count of skin cultures to determine antiseptic properties. After incubation, a blinded technician will count the colonies to determine the colony-forming units per square centimeter (CFU/cm2) of skin.

  4. Bacterial count of skin cultures for the 10% sodium hypochlorite

    Time frame: 24 hours

    Bacterial colony count of skin cultures to determine antiseptic properties. After incubation, a blinded technician will count the colonies to determine the colony-forming units per square centimeter (CFU/cm2) of skin.

  5. Bacterial count of skin cultures for the control 1

    Time frame: 24 hours

    Scrub with saline solution. Bacterial colony count of skin cultures to determine antiseptic properties. After incubation, a blinded technician will count the colonies to determine the colony-forming units per square centimeter (CFU/cm2) of skin.

  6. Bacterial count of skin cultures for the control 2

    Time frame: 24 hours

    Sample taken without wash. Bacterial colony count of skin cultures to determine antiseptic properties. After incubation, a blinded technician will count the colonies to determine the colony-forming units per square centimeter (CFU/cm2) of skin.

  7. Evaluation of antiseptic substantivity

    Time frame: 24 hours

    Explore the extended antiseptic activity provide by 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol, 10% sodium hypochlorite and 10% povidone-iodine, by evaluating bacterial grow inhibition in an agar plate.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Universidad de Guanajuato

Other

Collaborators

  • Antisepsia Central

Registry information

Official study title

Comparative Study of 2% Chlorhexidine Gluconate in 70% Isopropyl Alcohol Against 10% Sodium Hypochlorite as Skin Antiseptics in Human Volunteers

Important dates

Study start
2011
Primary completion
2011
Study completion
2012
First posted
Mar 23, 2011
Registry last updated
Jun 24, 2013

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.