daptomycin
Drug4mg/kg IV ; Q 24 hr (once every 24 hours)
Other names: Cubicin®
NCT Number: NCT00772447
The objectives of this study is to evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Intravenous Daptomycin (Cubicin®)Compared with that of Comparator (Vancomycin or Vancomycin Followed by Semi-synthetic Penicillin-cloxacillin) in the Treatment of Chinese Subjects with Complicated Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infection due to Gram-Positive Pathogens.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Research Site, Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
4mg/kg IV ; Q 24 hr (once every 24 hours)
Other names: Cubicin®
Vancomycin - 1g per 12 hrs, for 7-14 days
Or switch to
Vancomycin Followed by Semi-synthetic Penicillin-Cloxacillin:
Time frame: baseline to TOC(test of cure), for up to 4 weeks
Erythrocyte volume fraction means under certain conditions, after centrifugation pressing, the percentage of erythrocyte volume in the total volume of blood
Time frame: baseline to TOC(test of cure), for up to 4 weeks
Time frame: baseline to TOC(test of cure), for up to 4 weeks
Time frame: baseline to TOC(test of cure), for up to 4 weeks
Time frame: baseline to TOC(test of cure), for up to 4 weeks
percentage of patients who were primarily tested as normal ECG at baseline and changed into abnormal ECG at TOC visit in all the patients with normal ECG at baseline
Time frame: baseline and TOC, for up to 4 weeks
The percentage of patients who were cured or clinically improved in the clinical evaluable (CE) population of each arm at TOC visit was analyzed. CE population includes all the patients with no significant deviation from study protocol in full analysis set population, and meetting the following specific criteria: 1.receiving randomly dispensed study treatment at appropriate time(with a compliance of at least 80% or 4 days [3 days for patients evaluated as treatment failure]). 2.without the administration of potentially confounding non-investigational antibiotics (using one potentially effective non-investigational antibiotic for the treatment of primary infection due to other reasons than lack of efficacy from Day 1 to TOC [for systemicadministration of non-glycopeptides, >1 calendar day]). 3.meeting the study inclusion/exclusion criteria 4.necessary clinical evaluation performed (evaluation for effectiveness at TOC visit, except for the condition confirmed as clinically ineffective)
Time frame: baseline and EOT(end of therapy), for up to 2 weeks
The percentage of patients who were cured or clinically improved in the clinical evaluable (CE) population at EOT visit was analyzed. CE population includes all the patients with no significant deviation from study protocol in full analysis set population, and meetting the following specific criteria: 1.receiving randomly dispensed study treatment at appropriate time(with a compliance of at least 80% or 4 days [3 days for patients evaluated as treatment failure]). 2.without the administration of potentially confounding non-investigational antibiotics (using one potentially effective non-investigational antibiotic for the treatment of primary infection due to other reasons than lack of efficacy from Day 1 to TOC [for systemicadministration of non-glycopeptides, >1 calendar day]). 3.meeting the study inclusion/exclusion criteria 4.necessary clinical evaluation performed (evaluation for effectiveness at TOC visit, except for the condition confirmed as clinically ineffective)
Time frame: baseline and TOC, for up to 4 weeks
The microbiological response rate (removal or presumed removal) in ME(microbiological evaluable) population of daptomycin group and comparator group at TOC visit was analyzed. ME population includes all the patients with Gram-positive pathogenic bacteria isolated at baseline in CE population. Microbiological response rate means the percentage of strains which were removed or presumably removed at TOC visit in all the strains isolated from ME population at baseline.
Time frame: baseline and EOT, for up to 2 weeks
The microbiological response rate (removal or presumed removal) in ME(microbiological evaluable) population of daptomycin group and comparator group at EOT visit was analyzed. ME population includes all the patients with Gram-positive pathogenic bacteria isolated at baseline in CE population. Microbiological response rate means the percentage of strains which were removed or presumably removed at EOT visit in all the strains isolated from ME population at baseline.
Time frame: baseline and TOC, for up to 4 weeks
This is the comparison of clinical efficacy by methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus(MRSA) between the two groups. As the analysis was performed by specific pathogen in ME population and clinical efficacy was compared meanwhile, the clinical evaluation was based on the number of cases under the category of specific pathogen rather than the number of strains. Percentage of patients who were cured or improved at TOC visit in the patients who were identified with MRSA infection at baseline of both groups.
Time frame: baseline and TOC(test of cure), for up to 4 weeks
This is the comparison of clinical efficacy by methicillin sensitive staphylococcus aureus(MSSA) between the two groups. As the analysis was performed by specific pathogen in ME population and clinical efficacy was compared meanwhile, the clinical evaluation was based on the number of cases under the category of specific pathogen rather than the number of strains. Percentage of patients who were cured or improved at TOC visit in the patients who were identified with MSSA infection at baseline of both groups.
Time frame: baseline and TOC(test of cure), for up to 4 weeks
This is the comparison of clinical efficacy by staphylococcus aureus between the two groups. As the analysis was performed by specific pathogen in ME population and clinical efficacy was compared meanwhile, the clinical evaluation was based on the number of cases under the category of specific pathogen rather than the number of strains. Percentage of patients who were cured or improved at TOC visit in the patients who were identified with staphylococcus aureus infection at baseline of both groups.
AstraZeneca
Industry
A Phase 3, Multicentre, Randomised, Investigator-blinded, Parallel-groupStudy of the Safety and Efficacy of Intravenous Daptomycin (Cubicin®)Compared With That of Comparator (Vancomycin or Vancomycin Followed by Semi-synthetic Penicillin-cloxacillin) in the Treatment of Chinese Subjects With cSSSI
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT00162747
Cellulitis, Connective Tissue Diseases
Dhaka, Bangladesh
View Trial DetailsNCT06279143
BCC, BCC - Basal Cell Carcinoma
Vejle, Region of Southern Danmark, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT06092866
Digestive System Diseases, Gastro-Intestinal Disorder
Malmö, Region Skane, Sweden
View Trial DetailsNCT06237036
Chronic Disease, Disease Attributes
Torrejón de Ardoz, Madrid, Spain
View Trial Details