-
Geometric Mean Fold Rise of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 Against D614G for Groups 1 and 3A
Time frame: Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post Vaccination 1 (29 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 209 Post Vaccination 1 (181 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 394 Post Vaccination 1 (366 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Geometric Mean Fold Rise of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 (50% Inhibitory Dilution) against D614G. Fold-rise is calculated by dividing post-vaccination titers by the Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1 titer.
-
Geometric Mean Fold Rise of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 Against BA.1 for Groups 1 and 3A
Time frame: Day 57 Post Vaccination 1 (29 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 209 Post Vaccination 1 (181 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 394 Post Vaccination 1 (366 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Geometric Mean Fold Rise of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 (50% Inhibitory Dilution) against BA.1. Fold-rise is calculated by dividing post-vaccination titers by the Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1 titer.
-
Geometric Mean Fold Rise of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 Against BA.4/5 for Groups 1 and 3A
Time frame: Day 209 Post Vaccination 1 (181 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 394 Post Vaccination 1 (366 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Geometric Mean Fold Rise of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 (50% Inhibitory Dilution) against BA.4/5. Fold-rise is calculated by dividing post-vaccination titers by the Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1 titer.
-
Geometric Mean Fold Rise of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 Against D614G for Groups 3B and 4
Time frame: Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post Vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post Vaccination 1, Day 113 Post Vaccination 1, Day 169 Post Vaccination 1, Day 265 Post Vaccination 1, Day 450 Post Vaccination 1
Geometric Mean Fold Rise of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 (50% Inhibitory Dilution) against D614G. Fold-rise is calculated by dividing post-vaccination titers by the Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1 titer.
-
Geometric Mean Fold Rise of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 Against BA.1 for Groups 3B and 4
Time frame: Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post Vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post Vaccination 1, Day 113 Post Vaccination 1, Day 169 Post Vaccination 1, Day 265 Post Vaccination 1, Day 450 Post Vaccination 1
Geometric Mean Fold Rise of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 (50% Inhibitory Dilution) against BA.1. Fold-rise is calculated by dividing post-vaccination titers by the Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1 titer.
-
Geometric Mean Fold Rise of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 Against BA.4/5 for Groups 3B and 4
Time frame: Day 169 Post Vac 1 (85 Days Post Vac 2), Day 265 Post Vac 1 (181 Days Post Vac 2), Day 450 Post Vac 1 (366 Days Post Vac 2)
Geometric Mean Fold Rise of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 (50% Inhibitory Dilution) against BA.4/5. Fold-rise is calculated by dividing post-vaccination titers by the Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1 titer.
-
Geometric Mean Fold Rise of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 Against D614G for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, and 15
Time frame: Day 15 Post Vaccination, Day 29 Post Vaccination, Day 85 Post Vaccination, Day 181 Post Vaccination, Day 366 Post Vaccination
Geometric Mean Fold Rise of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 (50% Inhibitory Dilution) against D614G. Fold-rise is calculated by dividing post-vaccination titers by the Day 1 Pre-Vaccination titer.
-
Geometric Mean Fold Rise of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 Against BA.1 for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, and 15
Time frame: Day 15 Post Vaccination, Day 29 Post Vaccination, Day 85 Post Vaccination, Day 181 Post Vaccination, Day 366 Post Vaccination
Geometric Mean Fold Rise of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 (50% Inhibitory Dilution) against BA.1. Fold-rise is calculated by dividing post-vaccination titers by the Day 1 Pre-Vaccination titer.
-
Geometric Mean Fold Rise of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 Against BA.4/5 for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, and 15
Time frame: Day 15 Post Vaccination, Day 29 Post Vaccination, Day 85 Post Vaccination, Day 181 Post Vaccination, Day 366 Post Vaccination
Geometric Mean Fold Rise of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 (50% Inhibitory Dilution) against BA.4/5. Fold-rise is calculated by dividing post-vaccination titers by the Day 1 Pre-Vaccination titer.
-
Geometric Mean of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 Against D614G for Groups 1 and 3A
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post vaccination 1 (29 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 209 Post Vaccination 1 (181 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 394 Post Vaccination 1 (366 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Geometric Mean of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 (50% Inhibitory Dilution) against D614G
-
Geometric Mean of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 Against BA.1 for Groups 1 and 3A
Time frame: Day 57 Post vaccination 1 (29 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 209 Post Vaccination 1 (181 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 394 Post Vaccination 1 (366 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Geometric Mean of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 (50% Inhibitory Dilution) against BA.1
-
Geometric Mean of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 Against BA.4/5 for Groups 1 and 3A
Time frame: Day 209 Post Vaccination 1 (181 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 394 Post Vaccination 1 (366 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Geometric Mean of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 (50% Inhibitory Dilution) against BA.4/5
-
Geometric Mean of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 Against D614G for Groups 3B and 4
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post Vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post Vaccination 1, Day 113 Post Vaccination 1, Day 169 Post Vaccination 1, Day 265 Post Vaccination 1, Day 450 Post Vaccination 1
Geometric Mean of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 (50% Inhibitory Dilution) against D614G
-
Geometric Mean of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 Against BA.1 for Groups 3B and 4
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post Vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post Vaccination 1, Day 113 Post Vaccination 1, Day 169 Post Vaccination 1, Day 265 Post Vaccination 1, Day 450 Post Vaccination 1
Geometric Mean of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 (50% Inhibitory Dilution) against BA.1
-
Geometric Mean of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 Against BA.4/5 for Groups 3B and 4
Time frame: Day 169 Post Vaccination 1 (85 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 265 Post Vaccination 1 (181 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 450 Post Vaccination 1 (366 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Geometric Mean of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 (50% Inhibitory Dilution) against BA.4/5
-
Geometric Mean of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 Against D614G for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, and 15
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 15 Post Vaccination, Day 29 Post Vaccination, Day 85 Post Vaccination, Day 181 Post Vaccination, Day 366 Post Vaccination
Geometric Mean of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 (50% Inhibitory Dilution) against D614G
-
Geometric Mean of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 Against BA.1 for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, and 15
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 15 Post Vaccination, Day 29 Post Vaccination, Day 85 Post Vaccination, Day 181 Post Vaccination, Day 366 Post Vaccination
Geometric Mean of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 (50% Inhibitory Dilution) against BA.1
-
Geometric Mean of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 Against BA.4/5 for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, and 15
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 15 Post Vaccination, Day 29 Post Vaccination, Day 85 Post Vaccination, Day 181 Post Vaccination, Day 366 Post Vaccination
Geometric Mean of Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 (50% Inhibitory Dilution) against BA.4/5
-
Geometric Mean Titer of RBD IgG as Measured by ELISA for Groups 1 and 3A
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post vaccination 1 (29 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 209 Post Vaccination 1 (181 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 394 Post Vaccination 1 (366 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Geometric Mean of RBD titer
-
Geometric Mean Titer of RBD IgG as Measured by ELISA for Groups 3B and 4
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post Vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post Vaccination 1, Day 113 Post Vaccination 1, Day 169 Post Vaccination 1, Day 265 Post Vaccination 1, Day 450 Post Vaccination 1
Geometric Mean of RBD titer
-
Geometric Mean in Titer of RBD IgG as Measured by ELISA for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, and 15
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 15 Post Vaccination, Day 29 Post Vaccination, Day 85 Post Vaccination, Day 181 Post Vaccination, Day 366 Post Vaccination
Geometric Mean of RBD titer
-
Geometric Mean Titer of S-2P IgG as Measured by ELISA for Groups 1 and 3A
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post vaccination 1 (29 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 209 Post Vaccination 1 (181 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 394 Post Vaccination 1 (366 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Geometric Mean of S-2P titer
-
Geometric Mean Titer of S-2P IgG as Measured by ELISA for Groups 3B and 4
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post Vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post Vaccination 1, Day 113 Post Vaccination 1, Day 169 Post Vaccination 1, Day 265 Post Vaccination 1, Day 450 Post Vaccination 1
Geometric Mean of S-2P titer
-
Geometric Mean in Titer of S-2P IgG as Measured by ELISA for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, and 15
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 15 Post Vaccination, Day 29 Post Vaccination, Day 85 Post Vaccination, Day 181 Post Vaccination, Day 366 Post Vaccination
Geometric Mean of S-2P titer
-
Percent of Participants Who Seroconverted Based on Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 Against D614G S-2P for Groups 1 and 3A
Time frame: Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post vaccination 1 (29 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 209 Post Vaccination 1 (181 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 394 Post Vaccination 1 (366 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Percent of Participants Who Seroconverted, defined as a 4-fold change in Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 (50% Inhibitory Dilution) against D614G S-2P
-
Percent of Participants Who Seroconverted Based on Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 Against BA.1 S-2P for Groups 1 and 3A
Time frame: Day 57 Post vaccination 1 (29 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 209 Post Vaccination 1 (181 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 394 Post Vaccination 1 (366 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Percent of Participants Who Seroconverted, defined as a 4-fold change in Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 (50% Inhibitory Dilution) against BA.1 S-2P
-
Percent of Participants Who Seroconverted Based on Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 Against BA.4/5 S-2P for Groups 1 and 3A
Time frame: Day 209 Post Vaccination 1 (181 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 394 Post Vaccination 1 (366 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Percent of Participants Who Seroconverted, defined as a 4-fold change in Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 (50% Inhibitory Dilution) against BA.4/5 S-2P
-
Percent of Participants Who Seroconverted Based on Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 Against D614G S-2P for Groups 3B and 4
Time frame: Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post Vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post Vaccination 1, Day 113 Post Vaccination 1, Day 169 Post Vaccination 1, Day 265 Post Vaccination 1, Day 450 Post Vaccination 1
Percent of Participants Who Seroconverted, defined as a 4-fold change in Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 (50% Inhibitory Dilution) against D614G S-2P
-
Percent of Participants Who Seroconverted Based on Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 Against BA.1 S-2P for Groups 3B and 4
Time frame: Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post Vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post Vaccination 1, Day 113 Post Vaccination 1, Day 169 Post Vaccination 1, Day 265 Post Vaccination 1, Day 450 Post Vaccination 1
Percent of Participants Who Seroconverted, defined as a 4-fold change in Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 (50% Inhibitory Dilution), against BA.1 S-2P
-
Percent of Participants Who Seroconverted Based on Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 Against BA.4/5 S-2P for Groups 3B and 4
Time frame: Day 169 Post Vaccination 1 (85 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 265 Post Vaccination 1 (181 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 450 Post Vaccination 1 (366 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Percent of Participants Who Seroconverted, defined as a 4-fold change in Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 (50% Inhibitory Dilution), against BA.4/5 S-2P
-
Percent of Participants Who Seroconverted Based on Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 Against D614G S-2P for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14 and 15
Time frame: Day 15 Post Vaccination, Day 29 Post Vaccination, Day 85 Post Vaccination, Day 181 Post Vaccination, Day 366 Post Vaccination
Percent of Participants Who Seroconverted, defined as a 4-fold change in Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 (50% Inhibitory Dilution), against D614G S-2P
-
Percent of Participants Who Seroconverted Based on Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 Against BA.1 S-2P for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14 and 15
Time frame: Day 15 Post Vaccination, Day 29 Post Vaccination, Day 85 Post Vaccination, Day 181 Post Vaccination, Day 366 Post Vaccination
Percent of Participants Who Seroconverted, defined as a 4-fold change in Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 (50% Inhibitory Dilution), against BA.1 S-2P
-
Percent of Participants Who Seroconverted Based on Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 Against BA.4/5 S-2P for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14 and 15
Time frame: Day 15 Post Vaccination, Day 29 Post Vaccination, Day 85 Post Vaccination, Day 181 Post Vaccination, Day 366 Post Vaccination
Percent of Participants Who Seroconverted, defined as a 4-fold change in Pseudovirus Neutralization ID50 (50% Inhibitory Dilution), against BA.4/5 S-2P
-
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells With Any COV2 S Stimulation Expressing IFNg and/or IL-2 for Groups 1 and 3A
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post vaccination 1 (29 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells with Any COV2 S stimulation expressing IFNg and/or IL-2
-
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells With Any COV2 S Stimulation Expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154 for Groups 1 and 3A
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post vaccination 1 (29 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells with Any COV2 S stimulation expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154
-
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells With Any COV2 S Stimulation Expressing IFNg and/or IL-2 for Groups 3B and 4
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post vaccination 1 (15 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells with Any COV2 S stimulation expressing IFNg and/or IL-2
-
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells With Any COV2 S Stimulation Expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154 for Groups 3B and 4
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post vaccination 1 (15 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells with Any COV2 S stimulation expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154
-
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells With Any TCE Stimulation Expressing IFNg and/or IL-2 for Groups 3B and 4
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post vaccination 1 (15 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells with Any TCE stimulation expressing IFNg and/or IL-2
-
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells With Any TCE Stimulation Expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154 for Groups 3B and 4
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post vaccination 1 (15 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells with Any TCE stimulation expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154
-
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells With G-Mem Stimulation Expressing IFNg and/or IL-2 for Groups 3B and 4
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post vaccination 1 (15 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells with G-Mem stimulation expressing IFNg and/or IL-2
-
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells With G-Mem Stimulation Expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154 for Groups 3B and 4
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post vaccination 1 (15 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells with G-Mem stimulation expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154
-
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells With G-Nuc Stimulation Expressing IFNg and/or IL-2 for Groups 3B and 4
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post vaccination 1 (15 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells with G-Nuc stimulation expressing IFNg and/or IL-2
-
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells With G-Nuc Stimulation Expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154 for Groups 3B and 4
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post vaccination 1 (15 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells with G-Nuc stimulation expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154
-
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells With G-ORFa Stimulation Expressing IFNg and/or IL-2 for Groups 3B and 4
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post vaccination 1 (15 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells with G-ORFa stimulation expressing IFNg and/or IL-2
-
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells With G-ORFa Stimulation Expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154 for Groups 3B and 4
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post vaccination 1 (15 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells with G-ORFa stimulation expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154
-
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells With Any COV2 S Stimulation Expressing IFNg and/or IL-2 for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14 and 15
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 15 Post Vaccination
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells with Any COV2 S stimulation expressing IFNg and/or IL-2
-
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells With Any COV2 S Stimulation Expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154 for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14 and 15
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 15 Post Vaccination
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells with Any COV2 S stimulation expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154
-
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells With Any TCE Stimulation Expressing IFNg and/or IL-2 for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14 and 15
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 15 Post Vaccination
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells with Any TCE stimulation expressing IFNg and/or IL-2
-
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells With Any TCE Stimulation Expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154 for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14 and 15
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 15 Post Vaccination
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells with Any TCE stimulation expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154
-
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells With G-Mem Stimulation Expressing IFNg and/or IL-2 for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14 and 15
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 15 Post Vaccination
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells with G-Mem stimulation expressing IFNg and/or IL-2
-
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells With G-Mem Stimulation Expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154 for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14 and 15
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 15 Post Vaccination
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells with G-Mem stimulation expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154
-
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells With G-Nuc Stimulation Expressing IFNg and/or IL-2 for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14 and 15
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 15 Post Vaccination
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells with G-Nuc stimulation expressing IFNg and/or IL-2
-
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells With G-Nuc Stimulation Expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154 for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14 and 15
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 15 Post Vaccination
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells with G-Nuc stimulation expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154
-
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells With G-ORFa Stimulation Expressing IFNg and/or IL-2 for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14 and 15
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 15 Post Vaccination
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells with G-ORFa stimulation expressing IFNg and/or IL-2
-
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells With G-ORFa Stimulation Expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154 for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14 and 15
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 15 Post Vaccination
Mean Percent of CD4+ T Cells with G-ORFa stimulation expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154
-
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells With Any COV2 S Stimulation Expressing IFNg and/or IL-2 for Groups 1 and 3A
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post vaccination 1 (29 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells with Any COV2 S stimulation expressing IFNg and/or IL-2.
To assess positivity for a peptide pool within a T cell subset, a two-by-two contingency table was constructed comparing the stimulated and negative control data. The four entries in each table were the number of cells positive for the cytokine of interest and the number of cells negative for the cytokine, for both the stimulated and the negative control data. A one-sided Fisher's exact test was applied to the table, testing whether the number of cytokine-producing cells for the stimulated data was equal to that for the negative control data. Since multiple individual tests (for each peptide pool) were conducted simultaneously, a multiplicity adjustment was made to the individual peptide pool p-values using the Bonferroni-Holm adjustment method. If the adjusted p-value for a peptide pool was =0.00001, the response to the peptide pool for the T cell subset was considered positive.
-
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells With Any COV2 S Stimulation Expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154 for Groups 1 and 3A
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post vaccination 1 (29 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells with Any COV2 S stimulation expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154
To assess positivity for a peptide pool within a T cell subset, a two-by-two contingency table was constructed comparing the stimulated and negative control data. The four entries in each table were the number of cells positive for the cytokine of interest and the number of cells negative for the cytokine, for both the stimulated and the negative control data. A one-sided Fisher's exact test was applied to the table, testing whether the number of cytokine-producing cells for the stimulated data was equal to that for the negative control data. Since multiple individual tests (for each peptide pool) were conducted simultaneously, a multiplicity adjustment was made to the individual peptide pool p-vals using the Bonferroni-Holm adjustment method. If the adjusted p-val for a peptide pool was =0.00001, the response to the peptide pool for the T cell subset was considered positive.
-
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells With Any COV2 S Stimulation Expressing IFNg and/or IL-2 for Groups 3B and 4
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post vaccination 1 (15 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells with Any COV2 S stimulation expressing IFNg and/or IL-2.
To assess positivity for a peptide pool within a T cell subset, a two-by-two contingency table was constructed comparing the stimulated and negative control data. The four entries in each table were the number of cells positive for the cytokine of interest and the number of cells negative for the cytokine, for both the stimulated and the negative control data. A one-sided Fisher's exact test was applied to the table, testing whether the number of cytokine-producing cells for the stimulated data was equal to that for the negative control data. Since multiple individual tests (for each peptide pool) were conducted simultaneously, a multiplicity adjustment was made to the individual peptide pool p-values using the Bonferroni-Holm adjustment method. If the adjusted p-value for a peptide pool was =0.00001, the response to the peptide pool for the T cell subset was considered positive.
-
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells With Any COV2 S Stimulation Expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154 for Groups 3B and 4
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post vaccination 1 (15 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells with Any COV2 S stimulation expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154.
To assess positivity for a peptide pool within a T cell subset, a two-by-two contingency table was constructed comparing the stimulated and negative control data. The four entries in each table were the number of cells positive for the cytokine of interest and the number of cells negative for the cytokine, for both the stimulated and the negative control data. A one-sided Fisher's exact test was applied to the table, testing whether the number of cytokine-producing cells for the stimulated data was equal to that for the negative control data. Since multiple individual tests (for each peptide pool) were conducted simultaneously, a multiplicity adjustment was made to the individual peptide pool p-vals using the Bonferroni-Holm adjustment method. If the adjusted p-val for a peptide pool was =0.00001, the response to the peptide pool for the T cell subset was considered positive.
-
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells With Any TCE Stimulation Expressing IFNg and/or IL-2 for Groups 3B and 4
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post vaccination 1 (15 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells with Any TCE stimulation expressing IFNg and/or IL-2.
To assess positivity for a peptide pool within a T cell subset, a two-by-two contingency table was constructed comparing the stimulated and negative control data. The four entries in each table were the number of cells positive for the cytokine of interest and the number of cells negative for the cytokine, for both the stimulated and the negative control data. A one-sided Fisher's exact test was applied to the table, testing whether the number of cytokine-producing cells for the stimulated data was equal to that for the negative control data. Since multiple individual tests (for each peptide pool) were conducted simultaneously, a multiplicity adjustment was made to the individual peptide pool p-values using the Bonferroni-Holm adjustment method. If the adjusted p-value for a peptide pool was =0.00001, the response to the peptide pool for the T cell subset was considered positive.
-
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells With Any TCE Stimulation Expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154 for Groups 3B and 4
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post vaccination 1 (15 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells with Any TCE stimulation expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154.
To assess positivity for a peptide pool within a T cell subset, a two-by-two contingency table was constructed comparing the stimulated and negative control data. The four entries in each table were the number of cells positive for the cytokine of interest and the number of cells negative for the cytokine, for both the stimulated and the negative control data. A one-sided Fisher's exact test was applied to the table, testing whether the number of cytokine-producing cells for the stimulated data was equal to that for the negative control data. Since multiple individual tests (for each peptide pool) were conducted simultaneously, a multiplicity adjustment was made to the individual peptide pool p-vals using the Bonferroni-Holm adjustment method. If the adjusted p-val for a peptide pool was =0.00001, the response to the peptide pool for the T cell subset was considered positive.
-
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells With G-Mem Stimulation Expressing IFNg and/or IL-2 for Groups 3B and 4
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post vaccination 1 (15 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells with G-Mem stimulation expressing IFNg and/or IL-2.
To assess positivity for a peptide pool within a T cell subset, a two-by-two contingency table was constructed comparing the stimulated and negative control data. The four entries in each table were the number of cells positive for the cytokine of interest and the number of cells negative for the cytokine, for both the stimulated and the negative control data. A one-sided Fisher's exact test was applied to the table, testing whether the number of cytokine-producing cells for the stimulated data was equal to that for the negative control data. Since multiple individual tests (for each peptide pool) were conducted simultaneously, a multiplicity adjustment was made to the individual peptide pool p-values using the Bonferroni-Holm adjustment method. If the adjusted p-value for a peptide pool was =0.00001, the response to the peptide pool for the T cell subset was considered positive.
-
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells With G-Mem Stimulation Expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154 for Groups 3B and 4
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post vaccination 1 (15 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells with G-Mem stimulation expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154.
To assess positivity for a peptide pool within a T cell subset, a two-by-two contingency table was constructed comparing the stimulated and negative control data. The four entries in each table were the number of cells positive for the cytokine of interest and the number of cells negative for the cytokine, for both the stimulated and the negative control data. A one-sided Fisher's exact test was applied to the table, testing whether the number of cytokine-producing cells for the stimulated data was equal to that for the negative control data. Since multiple individual tests (for each peptide pool) were conducted simultaneously, a multiplicity adjustment was made to the individual peptide pool p-vals using the Bonferroni-Holm adjustment method. If the adjusted p-val for a peptide pool was =0.00001, the response to the peptide pool for the T cell subset was considered positive.
-
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells With G-Nuc Stimulation Expressing IFNg and/or IL-2 for Groups 3B and 4
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post vaccination 1 (15 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells with G-Nuc stimulation expressing IFNg and/or IL-2.
To assess positivity for a peptide pool within a T cell subset, a two-by-two contingency table was constructed comparing the stimulated and negative control data. The four entries in each table were the number of cells positive for the cytokine of interest and the number of cells negative for the cytokine, for both the stimulated and the negative control data. A one-sided Fisher's exact test was applied to the table, testing whether the number of cytokine-producing cells for the stimulated data was equal to that for the negative control data. Since multiple individual tests (for each peptide pool) were conducted simultaneously, a multiplicity adjustment was made to the individual peptide pool p-values using the Bonferroni-Holm adjustment method. If the adjusted p-value for a peptide pool was =0.00001, the response to the peptide pool for the T cell subset was considered positive.
-
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells With G-Nuc Stimulation Expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154 for Groups 3B and 4
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post vaccination 1 (15 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells with G-Nuc stimulation expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154.
To assess positivity for a peptide pool within a T cell subset, a two-by-two contingency table was constructed comparing the stimulated and negative control data. The four entries in each table were the number of cells positive for the cytokine of interest and the number of cells negative for the cytokine, for both the stimulated and the negative control data. A one-sided Fisher's exact test was applied to the table, testing whether the number of cytokine-producing cells for the stimulated data was equal to that for the negative control data. Since multiple individual tests (for each peptide pool) were conducted simultaneously, a multiplicity adjustment was made to the individual peptide pool p-vals using the Bonferroni-Holm adjustment method. If the adjusted p-val for a peptide pool was =0.00001, the response to the peptide pool for the T cell subset was considered positive.
-
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells With G-ORFa Stimulation Expressing IFNg and/or IL-2 for Groups 3B and 4
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post vaccination 1 (15 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells with G-ORFa stimulation expressing IFNg and/or IL-2.
To assess positivity for a peptide pool within a T cell subset, a two-by-two contingency table was constructed comparing the stimulated and negative control data. The four entries in each table were the number of cells positive for the cytokine of interest and the number of cells negative for the cytokine, for both the stimulated and the negative control data. A one-sided Fisher's exact test was applied to the table, testing whether the number of cytokine-producing cells for the stimulated data was equal to that for the negative control data. Since multiple individual tests (for each peptide pool) were conducted simultaneously, a multiplicity adjustment was made to the individual peptide pool p-values using the Bonferroni-Holm adjustment method. If the adjusted p-value for a peptide pool was =0.00001, the response to the peptide pool for the T cell subset was considered positive.
-
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells With G-ORFa Stimulation Expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154 for Groups 3B and 4
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post vaccination 1 (15 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells with G-ORFa stimulation expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154.
To assess positivity for a peptide pool within a T cell subset, a two-by-two contingency table was constructed comparing the stimulated and negative control data. The four entries in each table were the number of cells positive for the cytokine of interest and the number of cells negative for the cytokine, for both the stimulated and the negative control data. A one-sided Fisher's exact test was applied to the table, testing whether the number of cytokine-producing cells for the stimulated data was equal to that for the negative control data. Since multiple individual tests (for each peptide pool) were conducted simultaneously, a multiplicity adjustment was made to the individual peptide pool p-vals using the Bonferroni-Holm adjustment method. If the adjusted p-val for a peptide pool was =0.00001, the response to the peptide pool for the T cell subset was considered positive.
-
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells With Any COV2 S Stimulation Expressing IFNg and/or IL-2 for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14 and 15
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 15 Post Vaccination
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells with Any COV2 S stimulation expressing IFNg and/or IL-2.
To assess positivity for a peptide pool within a T cell subset, a two-by-two contingency table was constructed comparing the stimulated and negative control data. The four entries in each table were the number of cells positive for the cytokine of interest and the number of cells negative for the cytokine, for both the stimulated and the negative control data. A one-sided Fisher's exact test was applied to the table, testing whether the number of cytokine-producing cells for the stimulated data was equal to that for the negative control data. Since multiple individual tests (for each peptide pool) were conducted simultaneously, a multiplicity adjustment was made to the individual peptide pool p-values using the Bonferroni-Holm adjustment method. If the adjusted p-value for a peptide pool was =0.00001, the response to the peptide pool for the T cell subset was considered positive.
-
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells With Any COV2 S Stimulation Expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154 for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14 and 15
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 15 Post Vaccination
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells with Any COV2 S stimulation expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154.
To assess positivity for a peptide pool within a T cell subset, a two-by-two contingency table was constructed comparing the stimulated and negative control data. The four entries in each table were the number of cells positive for the cytokine of interest and the number of cells negative for the cytokine, for both the stimulated and the negative control data. A one-sided Fisher's exact test was applied to the table, testing whether the number of cytokine-producing cells for the stimulated data was equal to that for the negative control data. Since multiple individual tests (for each peptide pool) were conducted simultaneously, a multiplicity adjustment was made to the individual peptide pool p-vals using the Bonferroni-Holm adjustment method. If the adjusted p-val for a peptide pool was =0.00001, the response to the peptide pool for the T cell subset was considered positive.
-
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells With Any TCE Stimulation Expressing IFNg and/or IL-2 for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14 and 15
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 15 Post Vaccination
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells with Any TCE stimulation expressing IFNg and/or IL-2.
To assess positivity for a peptide pool within a T cell subset, a two-by-two contingency table was constructed comparing the stimulated and negative control data. The four entries in each table were the number of cells positive for the cytokine of interest and the number of cells negative for the cytokine, for both the stimulated and the negative control data. A one-sided Fisher's exact test was applied to the table, testing whether the number of cytokine-producing cells for the stimulated data was equal to that for the negative control data. Since multiple individual tests (for each peptide pool) were conducted simultaneously, a multiplicity adjustment was made to the individual peptide pool p-values using the Bonferroni-Holm adjustment method. If the adjusted p-value for a peptide pool was =0.00001, the response to the peptide pool for the T cell subset was considered positive.
-
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells With Any TCE Stimulation Expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154 for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14 and 15
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 15 Post Vaccination
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells with Any TCE stimulation expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154.
To assess positivity for a peptide pool within a T cell subset, a two-by-two contingency table was constructed comparing the stimulated and negative control data. The four entries in each table were the number of cells positive for the cytokine of interest and the number of cells negative for the cytokine, for both the stimulated and the negative control data. A one-sided Fisher's exact test was applied to the table, testing whether the number of cytokine-producing cells for the stimulated data was equal to that for the negative control data. Since multiple individual tests (for each peptide pool) were conducted simultaneously, a multiplicity adjustment was made to the individual peptide pool p-vals using the Bonferroni-Holm adjustment method. If the adjusted p-val for a peptide pool was =0.00001, the response to the peptide pool for the T cell subset was considered positive.
-
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells With G-Mem Stimulation Expressing IFNg and/or IL-2 for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14 and 15
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 15 Post Vaccination
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells with G-Mem stimulation expressing IFNg and/or IL-2.
To assess positivity for a peptide pool within a T cell subset, a two-by-two contingency table was constructed comparing the stimulated and negative control data. The four entries in each table were the number of cells positive for the cytokine of interest and the number of cells negative for the cytokine, for both the stimulated and the negative control data. A one-sided Fisher's exact test was applied to the table, testing whether the number of cytokine-producing cells for the stimulated data was equal to that for the negative control data. Since multiple individual tests (for each peptide pool) were conducted simultaneously, a multiplicity adjustment was made to the individual peptide pool p-values using the Bonferroni-Holm adjustment method. If the adjusted p-value for a peptide pool was =0.00001, the response to the peptide pool for the T cell subset was considered positive.
-
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells With G-Mem Stimulation Expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154 for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14 and 15
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 15 Post Vaccination
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells with G-Mem stimulation expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154.
To assess positivity for a peptide pool within a T cell subset, a two-by-two contingency table was constructed comparing the stimulated and negative control data. The four entries in each table were the number of cells positive for the cytokine of interest and the number of cells negative for the cytokine, for both the stimulated and the negative control data. A one-sided Fisher's exact test was applied to the table, testing whether the number of cytokine-producing cells for the stimulated data was equal to that for the negative control data. Since multiple individual tests (for each peptide pool) were conducted simultaneously, a multiplicity adjustment was made to the individual peptide pool p-vals using the Bonferroni-Holm adjustment method. If the adjusted p-val for a peptide pool was =0.00001, the response to the peptide pool for the T cell subset was considered positive.
-
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells With G-Nuc Stimulation Expressing IFNg and/or IL-2 for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14 and 15
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 15 Post Vaccination
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells with G-Nuc stimulation expressing IFNg and/or IL-2.
To assess positivity for a peptide pool within a T cell subset, a two-by-two contingency table was constructed comparing the stimulated and negative control data. The four entries in each table were the number of cells positive for the cytokine of interest and the number of cells negative for the cytokine, for both the stimulated and the negative control data. A one-sided Fisher's exact test was applied to the table, testing whether the number of cytokine-producing cells for the stimulated data was equal to that for the negative control data. Since multiple individual tests (for each peptide pool) were conducted simultaneously, a multiplicity adjustment was made to the individual peptide pool p-values using the Bonferroni-Holm adjustment method. If the adjusted p-value for a peptide pool was =0.00001, the response to the peptide pool for the T cell subset was considered positive.
-
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells With G-Nuc Stimulation Expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154 for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14 and 15
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 15 Post Vaccination
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells with G-Nuc stimulation expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154.
To assess positivity for a peptide pool within a T cell subset, a two-by-two contingency table was constructed comparing the stimulated and negative control data. The four entries in each table were the number of cells positive for the cytokine of interest and the number of cells negative for the cytokine, for both the stimulated and the negative control data. A one-sided Fisher's exact test was applied to the table, testing whether the number of cytokine-producing cells for the stimulated data was equal to that for the negative control data. Since multiple individual tests (for each peptide pool) were conducted simultaneously, a multiplicity adjustment was made to the individual peptide pool p-vals using the Bonferroni-Holm adjustment method. If the adjusted p-val for a peptide pool was =0.00001, the response to the peptide pool for the T cell subset was considered positive.
-
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells With G-ORFa Stimulation Expressing IFNg and/or IL-2 for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14 and 15
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 15 Post Vaccination
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells with G-ORFa stimulation expressing IFNg and/or IL-2.
To assess positivity for a peptide pool within a T cell subset, a two-by-two contingency table was constructed comparing the stimulated and negative control data. The four entries in each table were the number of cells positive for the cytokine of interest and the number of cells negative for the cytokine, for both the stimulated and the negative control data. A one-sided Fisher's exact test was applied to the table, testing whether the number of cytokine-producing cells for the stimulated data was equal to that for the negative control data. Since multiple individual tests (for each peptide pool) were conducted simultaneously, a multiplicity adjustment was made to the individual peptide pool p-values using the Bonferroni-Holm adjustment method. If the adjusted p-value for a peptide pool was =0.00001, the response to the peptide pool for the T cell subset was considered positive.
-
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells With G-ORFa Stimulation Expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154 for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14 and 15
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination, Day 15 Post Vaccination
Percent of Responders: CD4+ T Cells with G-ORFa stimulation expressing IL-4 or IL-5 or IL-13 and CD154.
To assess positivity for a peptide pool within a T cell subset, a two-by-two contingency table was constructed comparing the stimulated and negative control data. The four entries in each table were the number of cells positive for the cytokine of interest and the number of cells negative for the cytokine, for both the stimulated and the negative control data. A one-sided Fisher's exact test was applied to the table, testing whether the number of cytokine-producing cells for the stimulated data was equal to that for the negative control data. Since multiple individual tests (for each peptide pool) were conducted simultaneously, a multiplicity adjustment was made to the individual peptide pool p-vals using the Bonferroni-Holm adjustment method. If the adjusted p-val for a peptide pool was =0.00001, the response to the peptide pool for the T cell subset was considered positive.
-
Mean Spot Forming Units Per Million of the 15mer OLPs Spanning Membrane Frame for Groups 1 and 3A
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post vaccination 1 (29 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 209 Post Vaccination 1 (181 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 394 Post Vaccination 1 (366 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Mean spot forming units per million of the 15mer OLPs Spanning Membrane Frame as measured by ELISpot
-
Mean Spot Forming Units Per Million of the 15mer OLPa Spanning Nucleocapsid Frame for Groups 1 and 3A
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post vaccination 1 (29 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 209 Post Vaccination 1 (181 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 394 Post Vaccination 1 (366 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Mean spot forming units per million of the 15mer OLPa Spanning Nucleocapsid Frame as measured by ELISpot
-
Mean Spot Forming Units Per Million of the 15mer OLPs Spanning Open Reading Frame 3a for Groups 1 and 3A
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post vaccination 1 (29 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 209 Post Vaccination 1 (181 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 394 Post Vaccination 1 (366 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Mean spot forming units per million of the 15mer OLPs spanning Open Reading Frame 3a as measured by ELISpot
-
Mean Spot Forming Units Per Million of the Consensus Spike (Wuhan-1) Whole Protein, 1st of 4 OLP Pools for Groups 1 and 3A
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post vaccination 1 (29 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 209 Post Vaccination 1 (181 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 394 Post Vaccination 1 (366 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Mean spot forming units per million of the Consensus Spike (Wuhan-1) whole protein, 1st of 4 OLP pools as measured by ELISpot
-
Mean Spot Forming Units Per Million of the Consensus Spike (Wuhan-1) Whole Protein, 2nd of 4 OLP Pools for Groups 1 and 3A
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post vaccination 1 (29 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 209 Post Vaccination 1 (181 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 394 Post Vaccination 1 (366 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Mean spot forming units per million of the Consensus Spike (Wuhan-1) whole protein, 2nd of 4 OLP pools as measured by ELISpot
-
Mean Spot Forming Units Per Million of the Consensus Spike (Wuhan-1) Whole Protein, 3rd of 4 OLP Pools for Groups 1 and 3A
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post vaccination 1 (29 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 209 Post Vaccination 1 (181 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 394 Post Vaccination 1 (366 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Mean spot forming units per million of the Consensus Spike (Wuhan-1) whole protein, 3rd of 4 OLP pools as measured by ELISpot
-
Mean Spot Forming Units Per Million of the Consensus Spike (Wuhan-1) Whole Protein, 4th of 4 OLP Pools for Groups 1 and 3A
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post vaccination 1 (29 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 209 Post Vaccination 1 (181 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 394 Post Vaccination 1 (366 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Mean spot forming units per million of the Consensus Spike (Wuhan-1) whole protein, 4th of 4 OLP pools as measured by ELISpot
-
Mean Spot Forming Units Per Million of the S1 for Groups 1 and 3A
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post vaccination 1 (29 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 209 Post Vaccination 1 (181 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 394 Post Vaccination 1 (366 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Mean spot forming units per million of the S1 as measured by ELISpot
-
Mean Spot Forming Units Per Million of the S2 for Groups 1 and 3A
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post vaccination 1 (29 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 209 Post Vaccination 1 (181 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 394 Post Vaccination 1 (366 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Mean spot forming units per million of the S2 as measured by ELISpot
-
Mean Spot Forming Units Per Million of the Spike for Groups 1 and 3A
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post vaccination 1 (29 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 209 Post Vaccination 1 (181 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 394 Post Vaccination 1 (366 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Mean spot forming units per million of the Spike as measured by ELISpot
-
Mean Spot Forming Units Per Million of the 15mer OLP (Overlapping Peptides) Spanning Membrane, Nucleocapsid, and Open Reading Frame 3a for Groups 1 and 3A
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post vaccination 1 (29 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 209 Post Vaccination 1 (181 Days Post Vaccination 2), Day 394 Post Vaccination 1 (366 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Mean spot forming units per million of the 15mer OLP (overlapping peptides) Spanning Membrane, Nucleocapsid, and Open Reading Frame 3a as measured by ELISpot
-
Mean Spot Forming Units Per Million of the 15mer OLPs Spanning Membrane Frame for Groups 3B and 4
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post Vaccination 1, Day 113 Post Vaccination 1, Day 169 Post Vaccination 1, Day 265 Post Vaccination 1
Mean spot forming units per million of the 15mer OLPs Spanning Membrane Frame as measured by ELISpot
-
Mean Spot Forming Units Per Million of the 15mer OLPa Spanning Nucleocapsid Frame for Groups 3B and 4
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post Vaccination 1, Day 113 Post Vaccination 1, Day 169 Post Vaccination 1, Day 265 Post Vaccination 1
Mean spot forming units per million of the 15mer OLPa Spanning Nucleocapsid Frame as measured by ELISpot
-
Mean Spot Forming Units Per Million of the 15mer OLPs Spanning Open Reading Frame 3a for Groups 3B and 4
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post Vaccination 1, Day 113 Post Vaccination 1, Day 169 Post Vaccination 1, Day 265 Post Vaccination 1
Mean spot forming units per million of the 15mer OLPs spanning Open Reading Frame 3a as measured by ELISpot
-
Mean Spot Forming Units Per Million of the Consensus Spike (Wuhan-1) Whole Protein, 1st of 4 OLP Pools for Groups 3B and 4
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post Vaccination 1, Day 113 Post Vaccination 1, Day 169 Post Vaccination 1, Day 265 Post Vaccination 1
Mean spot forming units per million of the Consensus Spike (Wuhan-1) whole protein, 1st of 4 OLP pools as measured by ELISpot
-
Mean Spot Forming Units Per Million of the Consensus Spike (Wuhan-1) Whole Protein, 2nd of 4 OLP Pools for Groups 3B and 4
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post Vaccination 1, Day 113 Post Vaccination 1, Day 169 Post Vaccination 1, Day 265 Post Vaccination 1
Mean spot forming units per million of the Consensus Spike (Wuhan-1) whole protein, 2nd of 4 OLP pools as measured by ELISpot
-
Mean Spot Forming Units Per Million of the Consensus Spike (Wuhan-1) Whole Protein, 3rd of 4 OLP Pools for Groups 3B and 4
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post Vaccination 1, Day 113 Post Vaccination 1, Day 169 Post Vaccination 1, Day 265 Post Vaccination 1
Mean spot forming units per million of the Consensus Spike (Wuhan-1) whole protein, 3rd of 4 OLP pools as measured by ELISpot
-
Mean Spot Forming Units Per Million of the Consensus Spike (Wuhan-1) Whole Protein, 4th of 4 OLP Pools for Groups 3B and 4
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post Vaccination 1, Day 113 Post Vaccination 1, Day 169 Post Vaccination 1, Day 265 Post Vaccination 1
Mean spot forming units per million of the Consensus Spike (Wuhan-1) whole protein, 4th of 4 OLP pools as measured by ELISpot
-
Mean Spot Forming Units Per Million of the S1 for Groups 3B and 4
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post Vaccination 1, Day 113 Post Vaccination 1, Day 169 Post Vaccination 1, Day 265 Post Vaccination 1
Mean spot forming units per million of the S1 as measured by ELISpot
-
Mean Spot Forming Units Per Million of the S2 for Groups 3B and 4
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post Vaccination 1, Day 113 Post Vaccination 1, Day 169 Post Vaccination 1, Day 265 Post Vaccination 1
Mean spot forming units per million of the S2 as measured by ELISpot
-
Mean Spot Forming Units Per Million of the Spike for Groups 3B and 4
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post Vaccination 1, Day 113 Post Vaccination 1, Day 169 Post Vaccination 1, Day 265 Post Vaccination 1
Mean spot forming units per million of the Spike as measured by ELISpot
-
Mean Spot Forming Units Per Million of the 15mer OLP (Overlapping Peptides) Spanning Membrane, Nucleocapsid, and Open Reading Frame 3a for Groups 3B and 4
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post Vaccination 1, Day 57 Post vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 99 Post Vaccination 1, Day 113 Post Vaccination 1, Day 169 Post Vaccination 1, Day 265 Post Vaccination 1
Mean spot forming units per million of the 15mer OLP (overlapping peptides) Spanning Membrane, Nucleocapsid, and Open Reading Frame 3a as measured by ELISpot
-
Mean Spot Forming Units Per Million of the 15mer OLPs Spanning Membrane Frame for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, and 15
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 15 Post Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 181 Post Vaccination 1
Mean spot forming units per million of the 15mer OLPs Spanning Membrane Frame as measured by ELISpot.
-
Mean Spot Forming Units Per Million of the 15mer OLPa Spanning Nucleocapsid Frame for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, and 15
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 15 Post Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 181 Post Vaccination 1
Mean spot forming units per million of the 15mer OLPa Spanning Nucleocapsid Frame as measured by ELISpot.
-
Mean Spot Forming Units Per Million of the 15mer OLPs Spanning Open Reading Frame 3a for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, and 15
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 15 Post Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 181 Post Vaccination 1
Mean spot forming units per million of the 15mer OLPs spanning Open Reading Frame 3a as measured by ELISpot.
-
Mean Spot Forming Units Per Million of the Consensus Spike (Wuhan-1) Whole Protein, 1st of 4 OLP Pools for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, and 15
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 15 Post Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 181 Post Vaccination 1
Mean spot forming units per million of the Consensus Spike (Wuhan-1) whole protein, 1st of 4 OLP pools as measured by ELISpot.
-
Mean Spot Forming Units Per Million of the Consensus Spike (Wuhan-1) Whole Protein, 2nd of 4 OLP Pools for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, and 15
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 15 Post Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 181 Post Vaccination 1
Mean spot forming units per million of the Consensus Spike (Wuhan-1) whole protein, 2nd of 4 OLP pools as measured by ELISpot.
-
Mean Spot Forming Units Per Million of the Consensus Spike (Wuhan-1) Whole Protein, 3rd of 4 OLP Pools for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, and 15
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 15 Post Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 181 Post Vaccination 1
Mean spot forming units per million of the Consensus Spike (Wuhan-1) whole protein, 3rd of 4 OLP pools as measured by ELISpot.
-
Mean Spot Forming Units Per Million of the Consensus Spike (Wuhan-1) Whole Protein, 4th of 4 OLP Pools for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, and 15
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 15 Post Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 181 Post Vaccination 1
Mean spot forming units per million of the Consensus Spike (Wuhan-1) whole protein, 4th of 4 OLP pools as measured by ELISpot.
-
Mean Spot Forming Units Per Million of the S1 for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, and 15
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 15 Post Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 181 Post Vaccination 1
Mean spot forming units per million of the S1 as measured by ELISpot.
-
Mean Spot Forming Units Per Million of the S2 for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, and 15
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 15 Post Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 181 Post Vaccination 1
Mean spot forming units per million of the S2 as measured by ELISpot.
-
Mean Spot Forming Units Per Million of the Spike for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, and 15
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 15 Post Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 181 Post Vaccination 1
Mean spot forming units per million of the Spike as measured by ELISpot.
-
Mean Spot Forming Units Per Million of the 15mer OLP (Overlapping Peptides) Spanning Membrane, Nucleocapsid, and Open Reading Frame 3a for Groups 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, and 15
Time frame: Day 1 Pre-Vaccination 1, Day 15 Post Vaccination 1, Day 29 Post vaccination 1, Day 85 Post Vaccination 1, Day 181 Post Vaccination 1
Mean spot forming units per million of the 15mer OLP (overlapping peptides) Spanning Membrane, Nucleocapsid, and Open Reading Frame 3a as measured by ELISpot.
-
Mean T-cells Expressing IL-2 in pg/mL for Groups 1 and 3A at Day 29 Post Vaccination 1
Time frame: Day 29 Post Vaccination 1
Mean T-cells Expressing IL-2 in pg/mL as measured by MSD cytokine assay
-
Mean T-cells Expressing IL-4 in pg/mL for Groups 1 and 3A at Day 29 Post Vaccination 1
Time frame: Day 29 Post Vaccination 1
Mean T-cells Expressing IL-4 in pg/mL as measured by MSD cytokine assay
-
Mean T-cells Expressing IL-10 in pg/mL for Groups 1 and 3A at Day 29 Post Vaccination 1
Time frame: Day 29 Post Vaccination 1
Mean T-cells Expressing IL-10 in pg/mL as measured by MSD cytokine assay
-
Mean T-cells Expressing IL-13 in pg/mL for Groups 1 and 3A at Day 29 Post Vaccination 1
Time frame: Day 29 Post Vaccination 1
Mean T-cells Expressing IL-13 in pg/mL as measured by MSD cytokine assay
-
Mean T-cells Expressing TNF-alpha in pg/mL for Groups 1 and 3A at Day 29 Post Vaccination 1
Time frame: Day 29 Post Vaccination 1
Mean T-cells Expressing TNF-alpha in pg/mL as measured by MSD cytokine assay
-
Mean T-cells Expressing IL-2 in pg/mL for Groups 3B and 4 at Day 29 Post Vaccination 1
Time frame: Day 29 Post Vaccination 1
Mean T-cells Expressing IL-2 in pg/mL as measured by MSD cytokine assay
-
Mean T-cells Expressing IL-4 in pg/mL for Groups 3B and 4 at Day 29 Post Vaccination 1
Time frame: Day 29 Post Vaccination 1
Mean T-cells Expressing IL-4 in pg/mL as measured by MSD cytokine assay
-
Mean T-cells Expressing IL-10 in pg/mL for Groups 3B and 4 at Day 29 Post Vaccination 1
Time frame: Day 29 Post Vaccination 1
Mean T-cells Expressing IL-10 in pg/mL as measured by MSD cytokine assay
-
Mean T-cells Expressing IL-13 in pg/mL for Groups 3B and 4 at Day 29 Post Vaccination 1
Time frame: Day 29 Post Vaccination 1
Mean T-cells Expressing IL-13 in pg/mL as measured by MSD cytokine assay
-
Mean T-cells Expressing TNF-alpha in pg/mL for Groups 3B and 4 at Day 29 Post Vaccination 1
Time frame: Day 29 Post Vaccination 1
Mean T-cells Expressing TNF-alpha in pg/mL as measured by MSD cytokine assay
-
Mean T-cells Expressing IL-2 in pg/mL for Groups 3B and 4 at Day 113 Post Vaccination 1 (29 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Time frame: Day 113 Post Vaccination 1 (29 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Mean T-cells Expressing IL-2 in pg/mL as measured by MSD cytokine assay
-
Mean T-cells Expressing IL-4 in pg/mL for Groups 3B and 4 at Day 113 Post Vaccination 1 (29 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Time frame: Day 113 Post Vaccination 1 (29 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Mean T-cells Expressing IL-4 in pg/mL as measured by MSD cytokine assay
-
Mean T-cells Expressing IL-10 in pg/mL for Groups 3B and 4 at Day 113 Post Vaccination 1 (29 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Time frame: Day 113 Post Vaccination 1 (29 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Mean T-cells Expressing IL-10 in pg/mL as measured by MSD cytokine assay
-
Mean T-cells Expressing IL-13 in pg/mL for Groups 3B and 4 at Day 113 Post Vaccination 1 (29 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Time frame: Day 113 Post Vaccination 1 (29 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Mean T-cells Expressing IL-13 in pg/mL as measured by MSD cytokine assay
-
Mean T-cells Expressing TNF-alpha in pg/mL for Groups 3B and 4 at Day 113 Post Vaccination 1 (29 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Time frame: Day 113 Post Vaccination 1 (29 Days Post Vaccination 2)
Mean T-cells Expressing TNF-alpha in pg/mL as measured by MSD cytokine assay
-
Mean T-cells Expressing IL-2 in pg/mL for Groups 5 and 6 at Day 29 Post Vaccination 1
Time frame: Day 29 Post Vaccination 1
Mean T-cells Expressing IL-2 in pg/mL as measured by MSD cytokine assay
-
Mean T-cells Expressing IL-4 in pg/mL for Groups 5 and 6 at Day 29 Post Vaccination 1
Time frame: Day 29 Post Vaccination 1
Mean T-cells Expressing IL-4 in pg/mL as measured by MSD cytokine assay
-
Mean T-cells Expressing IL-10 in pg/mL for Groups 5 and 6 at Day 29 Post Vaccination 1
Time frame: Day 29 Post Vaccination 1
Mean T-cells Expressing IL-10 in pg/mL as measured by MSD cytokine assay
-
Mean T-cells Expressing IL-13 in pg/mL for Groups 5 and 6 at Day 29 Post Vaccination 1
Time frame: Day 29 Post Vaccination 1
Mean T-cells Expressing IL-13 in pg/mL as measured by MSD cytokine assay
-
Mean T-cells Expressing TNF-alpha in pg/mL for Groups 5 and 6 at Day 29 Post Vaccination 1
Time frame: Day 29 Post Vaccination 1
Mean T-cells Expressing TNF-alpha in pg/mL as measured by MSD cytokine assay