Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University
Alexandria, 21512, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT04654624
The aim of the current study was to compare pain perception of young children treated with SDF and ART, as well as their parents' acceptability of both modalities.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me3 year–8 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Alexandria, 21512, Egypt
Eighty, 3-8-years-old children, having at least one deciduous asymptomatic tooth with active caries were randomly assigned into 2 groups; SDF for caries arresting in the test group, and ART for caries removal in the control group.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Steps of SDF 38% application were carried out following the manufacturer's instructions. Eligible primary carious teeth were first dried and isolated using cotton rolls and gauze. Adjacent soft tissues were isolated using petrolleum gelly in order to prevent any irritation or staining from SDF that was directly placed into the carious lesion using a microbrush, allowed to absorb for 2 minutes, then dried with air. Parents were instructed that children should not eat for one hour after treatment. The second application was done after 6 months.
Steps of ART caries removal were carried out following the Frencken et al. criteria where the cavity opening was widened using the tip of a dental hatchet. The carious dentin was then removed using a spoon excavator starting at the enamel-dentin junction, unsupported enamel was removed using the hatchet, and finally the cavity was cleaned using a wet cotton pellet and dried. After complete removal of infected dentin, the cavity walls and floor were conditioned for 10 seconds, washed and dried with cotton pellets, then restored with chemically cured glass ionomer cement that was applied under finger pressure, then coated with petroleum jelly.
Time frame: 6 months
Pain reaction was assessed using the Sound, Eye, Motor scale (SEM) according to Wright et al. criteria. It is an objective method for pain assessment, where the child's level of anxiety was evaluated according to three types of observations. The score in each category ranged from one (no pain) to four (intense pain). A lower score represents less physical reaction to the procedure than does a higher value. Time of treatment was recorded using a stopwatch.
Time frame: 2 weeks
It was assessed using a 5-likert scale, self-administered questionnaire, specifically designed for the current study.
Nourhan M.Aly
Other
Child Discomfort and Parental Acceptability of Silver Diamine Fluoride and Alternative Restorative Treatment: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07718412
Behavior, Dental Caries
Sivas, Merkez, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07720999
Dental Caries, Neurologic Manifestations
Cairo, Cairo Governorate, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT04750902
Dental Caries, Stomatognathic Diseases
Loma Linda, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06861725
Caries Arrested, Dental Caries
Cairo, Cairo Guv, Egypt
View Trial Details