Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07338006

Chest Wall Reconstruction Cohort

Chest wall reconstruction following tumor or infection-related resections remains a challenging aspect of thoracic surgery, requiring restoration of structural stability and preservation of respiratory mechanics. While polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) bone cement has long been used for rigid reconstruction, its limitations-including high cost, rigidity, infection risk, and interference with normal respiratory motion-pose challenges in resource-constrained settings. Twisted stainless steel wires offer a low-cost, flexible alternative that allows dynamic chest wall movement and easier adaptability in low- and middle-income countries such as Pakistan.

To compare postoperative outcomes, complications, and cost-effectiveness of chest wall reconstruction using twisted stainless steel wires versus PMMA bone cement over a two-year period (January 2025 - December 2026).

This prospective cohort study was conducted in the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Services Hospital, Lahore, a high-volume tertiary care and referral center. Patients undergoing chest wall reconstruction following resection for tumors, infections, or trauma were enrolled and divided into two groups based on the reconstruction technique used: Group A (twisted steel wires) and Group B (PMMA bone cement). Parameters assessed included postoperative pain (VAS scores), respiratory function, chest wall stability, complications (infection, wound dehiscence, prosthesis exposure), duration of hospital stay, readmission rate, and cost of reconstruction. Data were analyzed to compare clinical and functional outcomes between both cohorts.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Services Hospital, Lahore

Lahore, Punjab Province, 54000, Pakistan

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Muhammad Shoaib Nabi, FCPS

CONTACT

[email protected]

+92 321 4347410

About this study

Chest wall resection for tumors results in complex structural defects that require meticulous reconstruction to restore stability, protection, and respiratory function. The chest wall, composed of a combination of bony and soft tissue components, plays a crucial role in ventilation; thus, its reconstruction must achieve mechanical integrity while preserving physiologic mobility and minimizing postoperative morbidity.

Multiple techniques and materials have been developed for chest wall reconstruction, including synthetic meshes, titanium plates, and polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) bone cement. PMMA remains widely used due to its moldability and compressive strength; however, its rigidity, low tensile strength, poor adhesion, and potential for thermal necrosis and infection limit its functional and clinical effectiveness. Furthermore, its high cost and non-dynamic properties make it less suitable in resource-constrained settings.

In contrast, twisted stainless steel wires (No. 05) offer a simple, durable, and cost-effective alternative. These wires provide robust mechanical support with dynamic flexibility, preserving normal respiratory motion and chest wall recoil. Recent advancements have demonstrated that wire-reinforced neorib configurations can achieve both tensile and compressive strength comparable to rigid prosthetics, while avoiding the static limitations of PMMA. Their affordability and availability make them particularly advantageous in low- and middle-income countries where economic feasibility dictates surgical decisions.

Recent studies have further explored biologic and synthetic prosthetic materials, microvascular flaps, and hybrid "biosandwich" techniques to optimize chest wall reconstruction outcomes. Nevertheless, data comparing simple, low-cost methods such as twisted steel wire constructs and PMMA-based reconstructions remain limited, particularly in regions with restricted access to advanced materials. In Pakistan, evidence is largely confined to isolated case reports, including a novel reconstruction of a neosternum using steel wires for recurrent sternal chondrosarcoma.

The present cohort study, conducted in the Department of Thoracic Surgery at Services Hospital, Lahore, aims to compare the outcomes of chest wall reconstruction using twisted stainless steel wires versus PMMA bone cement over two years from January 2025 to December 2026. By evaluating postoperative pain, respiratory function, chest wall recoil, and complication rates, this study seeks to provide evidence-based recommendations for the optimal reconstructive strategy in resource-limited healthcare environments.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged ≥18 years undergoing partial or full-thickness chest wall resection.
  • Defects requiring rigid or semi-rigid reconstruction involving two or more ribs or the sternum.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients with small defects managed by primary closure or soft tissue-only reconstruction.
  • Patients with concurrent major intrathoracic resections (e.g., pneumonectomy) may confound postoperative respiratory assessment.
  • Recurrent disease requiring revision reconstruction.
  • Patients unwilling or unable to provide consent or comply with follow-up.

Treatment and study plan

chest wall reconstruction

Procedure

Chest wall reconstruction was performed using PMMA bone cement molded intraoperatively over a polypropylene mesh to form a rigid prosthesis. The construct was fixed to the adjacent ribs with nonabsorbable sutures or wires.

Primary outcomes

  1. Postoperative Pain Assessment:

    Time frame: 24 hours, 48 hours and 7 days post-operatively

    Postoperative analgesia followed a standardized multimodal protocol of intravenous paracetamol and NSAIDs unless contraindicated, supplemented with intravenous morphine (0.05-0.1 mg/kg) as required. Thoracic epidural or paravertebral blockade was used selectively based on resection extent or anesthetist preference. Rescue analgesia was administered when VAS pain scores were ≥4 at rest or ≥5 during movement.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Chest Wall Movement

    Time frame: 1 month and 3 months post-operatively

    Chest wall function was evaluated clinically at discharge, at 1-month follow-up, and at 3-month follow-up by the operating surgeon or thoracic fellow, and patients who underwent surgery earlier in the study period remain under active surveillance, providing a total follow-up duration of up to two years. Assessment included inspection for paradoxical movement during quiet and deep breathing and measurement of axillary excursion when feasible. Normal chest movement was defined as symmetrical expansion or ≥3 cm axillary excursion. Restricted movement was defined as <3 cm excursion, ≥25% asymmetry relative to the contralateral side, or patient-reported limitation.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Muhammad Shoaib Nabi, FCPS

CONTACT

[email protected]

+92 3214347410

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Health Sciences Lahore

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparative Outcomes of Chest Wall Reconstruction Using Twisted Steel Wires Versus Bone Cement: A Cohort Study

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2027
First posted
Jan 13, 2026
Registry last updated
Jan 13, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.