Chemotherapy followed by endocrine therapy and ribociclib treatment
DrugEndocrine therapy and ribociclib treatment
Other names: Ribociclib, Adjuvant hormonotherapy
NCT Number: NCT07237256
The advent of CDK4/6 inhibitors (drugs designed to block the action of CDK4/6 proteins, which play a key role in cell proliferation) has improved treatment prospects for patients with metastatic breast cancer whose tumour cells express hormone receptors but not the HER2 protein (HR+/HER2-). The NATALEE study showed that the addition of ribociclib for three years to conventional adjuvant hormone therapy (i.e. after surgery) prolonged survival free of invasive disease (i.e. extending to surrounding tissues) in patients with early HR breast cancer+ /HER2-. Unlike other studies, NATALEE included a group of patients at intermediate risk of recurrence, usually treated with adjuvant chemotherapy before receiving hormone therapy. However, the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in these patients is uncertain. The hypothesis of the NoLEEta study is that by using the CDK 4/6 inhibitor, patients could avoid adjuvant chemotherapy and therefore be spared the side-effects associated with this chemotherapy, without reducing the efficacy of the treatment.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
Female
Interventional
Phase 3
Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, Île-de-France Region, France
The advent of CDK4/6 inhibitors has changed the outlook of patients with metastatic hormone receptor-positive (HR+) HER2- breast cancer. Moreover, including CDK4/6 inhibitors in the adjuvant treatment regimens strategies has led to significant gains in disease-free survival.
The phase III NATALEE trial demonstrated the efficacy of an adjuvant three-year treatment with ribociclib in prolonging invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) in patients with intermediate and high-risk HR+ HER2- early breast cancer.
Contrarily to similar studies of CDK4/6 inhibitors in this setting, NATALEE included a group of patients with intermediate clinical risk (pT1-2 pN1, pT3-4 pN0 or pT2 pN0 with histological grade 3 or grade 2 with Ki67≥ 20%). These patients are usually considered for adjuvant chemotherapy based on their clinicopathological conditions or the results of a genomic signature (e.g. Oncotype Dx). Nevertheless, the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in these patients is uncertain (and likely small) in the context of an adjuvant treatment strategy that includes a CDK 4/6 inhibitor.
As such, a de-escalation trial could demonstrate that patients with intermediate-risk breast cancer treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors could be spared the dreaded chemotherapy side effects while ensuring similar survival outcomes.
In order to be generalizable and practice changing, a trial in this setting should aim to be as pragmatic as possible, particularly in inclusion criteria, with the required resources for patient inclusion and delivery of care being as similar as possible to those employed in usual care. As such, chemotherapy eligibility should be defined similarly to routine clinical practice in the participating centers (i.e. using routine clinicopathological parameters and/or genomic signatures).
While single-arm designs could help address non-inferiority in the previously mentioned setting, they are usually compared to historical controls and lack external validation. Moreover, in some settings, like early breast cancer, the standard of care may change relatively quickly (e.g. Oncotype Dx-based chemotherapy de-escalation or adjuvant CDK4/6 inhibitors use), rendering the comparison to historical controls challenging, limiting the study conclusions and their impact on clinical practice. Finally, there is no consensus on the optimal non-inferiority threshold in single-arm trials using historical controls as a comparator. As such, randomized controlled non-inferiority trials with a strict non-inferiority margin remain the gold standard design to prove that a de-escalated treatment regimen is safe and advantageous, and the only ones capable of producing level IA evidence according to ESMO (Trapani et al., Annals of Oncology 2022).
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Note: When the patient is physically unable to give their written consent, an impartial witness of their choice, independent from the investigator or the sponsor, can confirm in writing the patient's consent.
Post-menopausal status is defined as:
Note: Multifocal and multicentric tumors are allowed if they meet the clinical stage II criteria of the 8th Edition of the AJCC. All tumors must be ER-positive and HER2-negative. Patients with bilateral invasive breast cancer (diagnosed simultaneously or within 6 months of each other) are eligible if all lesions tested on both sides are ER+ (ie, ≥10% positive stained cells) and HER2- AND adequate surgery has been performed in both breasts.
Exclusion criteria
Note: The following uses of corticosteroids are permitted: a short duration (<5 days) of systemic corticosteroids; any duration of topical applications (e.g. for rash), inhaled sprays (e.g. for obstructive airways diseases), eye drops or local injections (e.g. intra-articular).
Endocrine therapy and ribociclib treatment
Other names: Ribociclib, Adjuvant hormonotherapy
De-escalation of the chemotherapy in the adjuvant setting
Other names: Ribociclib, Adjuvant hormonotherapy
Time frame: From ramdomization to iBCFS, up to 12 years.
iBCFS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first event of invasive ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence, local-regional invasive recurrence, distant recurrence, death (any cause) or invasive contralateral breast cancer as assessed by investigator.
Time frame: From ramdomization to iDFS event, up to 12 years.
iDFS is defined as the time from date of randomization to the date of the first iDFS event that is: i) same event as IBCFS, or ii) secondary invasive non breast cancer.
Time frame: From ramdomization to DDFS event, up to 12 years.
DDFS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first event of distant recurrence, death (any cause), or second primary non-breast invasive cancer (excluding basal and squamous cell carcinomas of the skin).
Time frame: From ramdomization to death from any cause, up to 12 years.
OS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause
Time frame: From ramdomization to iBCFS event, up to 12 years.
To evaluate the rate of the different types of iBCFS events in each treatment arm
Time frame: Throughout study completion, up to 8.5 years.
The National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5 (NCI-CTCAE v5) is widely accepted in the community of oncology research as the leading rating scale for adverse events. This scale, divided into 5 grades (1 = "mild", 2 = "moderate", 3
= "severe", 4 = "life-threatening", and 5 = "death")
Time frame: At baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 5 years, 8.5 years from randomization.
Developed by the EORTC, this self-reported questionnaire assesses the health-related quality of life of cancer patients in clinical trials. The questionnaire includes five functional scales (physical, everyday activity, cognitive, emotional, and social), three symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea and vomiting), a health/quality of life overall scale, and a number of additional elements assessing common symptoms (including dyspnea, loss of appetite, insomnia, constipation, and diarrhea), as well as, the perceived financial impact of the disease. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level.
Time frame: At baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 5 years, 8.5 years from randomization.
This EORTC breast cancer specific questionnaire is intended to supplement the QLQ-C30.
The QLQ-BR42 incorporates nine multi-item scales to assess body image, sexual functioning, breast satisfaction, systemic therapy side effects, arm symptoms, breast symptoms, endocrine therapy symptoms, skin mucosis symptoms, endocrine sexual symptoms. In addition, single items assess sexual enjoyment, future perspective and being upset by hair loss. All items are rated on a four-point Likert-type scale (1 = "not at all", 2 = "a little", 3 = "quite a bit", and 4 = "very much"), and are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale. Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms or problems for all items.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
UNICANCER
Other
No Chemotherapy in Intermediate-risk HR+ HER2- Early Breast Cancer Treated With Ribociclib (LEE-011) in the Adjuvant Setting, a Non-inferiority Phase III Trial
Acronym: NoLEEta
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04816006
Anatomic Stage I Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Anatomic Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v8
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05625659
Breast Cancer, Breast Diseases
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06954337
Breast Cancer, Breast Diseases
Basking Ridge, New Jersey, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07340541
Breast Cancer, Breast Diseases
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
View Trial Details