Cisplatin
Drug100 mg/m^2 intravenously on days 1, 22
NCT Number: NCT00047008
RATIONALE: Radiation therapy (RT) uses high-energy x-rays to damage tumor cells. Giving radiation therapy in different ways and combining it with chemotherapy before surgery may kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known which radiation therapy regimen combined with chemotherapy with or without surgery is more effective for head and neck cancer.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare two different radiation therapy regimens combined with cisplatin with or without surgery in treating patients who have stage III or stage IV head and neck cancer.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Comprehensive Cancer Center at University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
Secondary
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to tumor site (larynx vs other), nodal stage (N0 vs N1 or N2a or N2b vs N2c or N3), and Zubrod performance status (0 vs 1). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
Patients with biopsy-proven relapsed disease more than 3 months after completion of therapy undergo surgical resection of the primary tumor.
Quality of life is assessed at baseline, during one of the last 2 weeks of treatment, at 3 and 12 months, and then annually for 4 years.
Patients are followed at 6-8 weeks, every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 3 years, and then annually thereafter.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 720 patients (360 per treatment arm) will be accrued for this study within 3 years.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
Age
Performance status
Life expectancy
Hematopoietic
Hepatic
Renal
Cardiovascular
Other
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
Biologic therapy
Chemotherapy
Endocrine therapy
Radiotherapy
Surgery
100 mg/m^2 intravenously on days 1, 22
Radiation will be delivered in 2 Gy per fraction, five fractions a week. The primary tumor and clinically/radiologically involved nodes will receive 70 Gy in 7 weeks and uninvolved nodes will receive 50 Gy in 5 weeks. The anterior lower neck field will be treated with 2 Gy per fraction at 3-cm depth to a total dose of 50 Gy.
Radiation to the initial target volume encompassing the gross and subclinical disease sites will be delivered in 1.8 Gy per fraction, five fractions a week to 54 Gy in 30 fractions over 6 weeks. At 32.4 Gy/18 Fx (i.e., latter part of week 4), the boost volume covering gross tumor and clinically/radiologically involved nodes will receive boost irradiation of 1.5 Gy/Fx as second daily fraction (at least 6 h interval) for a total of 12 treatment days (18 Gy total). The primary tumor and clinically/radiologically involved nodes will receive 72 Gy in 42 fractions over 6 weeks and uninvolved nodes will receive 54 Gy in 6 weeks. Clinically/radiologically negative posterior neck should receive a minimum dose of 50.4 Gy at 3 cm. The anterior lower neck field will be treated with 1.8 Gy per fraction at 3-cm depth to a total dose of 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions in 5.6 weeks.
Surgical removal (salvage resection) of the primary tumor should be performed if biopsy-proven cancer remains more than three months after completion of therapy. The nature of the surgical resection should be dictated by the extent of tumor at the initial evaluation. The operation should be conducted using accepted criteria for primary surgical treatment of the cancer.
A planned neck dissection for patients with multiple neck nodes or with lymph nodes exceeding 3 cm in diameter (N2a, N2b, N3) is mandatory, regardless of the clinical and/or radiographic response. A neck dissection is required for patients with N1 disease if a palpable or worrisome radiographic abnormality persists in the neck six weeks after completion of therapy. Surgery should be performed within 2 weeks once the decision for neck dissection is made.
Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule from end of treatment: 6-8 weeks, every 3 mo. for 2 yr., then every 6 mo. for 3 yr., then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 6.5 years. Three-year rates are reported here.
Overall survival time is defined as time from randomization to the date of death (failure) or last known follow-up (censored). Overall survival rates are estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. The full distribution is the outcome of interest, and the protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. Three-year estimates are provided as a summary of the distributions. Analysis was planned to occur after 309 deaths had been reported.
Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule from end of treatment: 6-8 weeks, every 3 mo. for 2 yr., then every 6 mo. for 3 yr., then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 6.5 years. Three-year rates are reported here.
Local-regional failure time is defined as time from randomization to persistent disease in the primary tumor or regional nodes (considered an event at day 1), relapse/progression in either of those sites (considered an event at the time of relapse/progression), death (competing event), or last follow-up (censored). Progression is defined as an estimated increase in the size of the tumor of greater than 25% or appearance of new areas of malignant disease. The full distribution is the outcome of interest, and the protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. Three-year estimates are provided as a summary of the distributions. Analysis was planned to occur after 309 deaths had been reported.
Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule from end of treatment: 6-8 weeks, every 3 mo. for 2 yr., then every 6 mo. for 3 yr., then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 6.5 years. Three-year rates are reported here.
Local-regional failure time is defined as time from randomization to relapse/progression in the primary tumor or regional nodes (event), death due to study cancer or unknown causes (event), death due to other causes (competing event), distant metastasis (competing event), or last follow-up (censored). Progression is defined as an estimated increase in the size of the tumor of greater than 25% or appearance of new areas of malignant disease. The full distribution is the outcome of interest, and the protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. Three-year estimates are provided as a summary of the distributions. Analysis was planned to occur after 309 deaths had been reported.
Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule from end of treatment: 6-8 weeks, every 3 mo. for 2 yr., then every 6 mo. for 3 yr., then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 6.5 years. Three-year rates are reported here.
Disease-free survival time is defined as time from randomization to persistent disease in the primary tumor or regional nodes (considered an event at day 1), relapse/progression in either of those sites (considered an event at the time of relapse/progression), distant metastasis (event), second primary tumor (event), death (event), or last follow-up (censored). Progression is defined as an estimated increase in the size of the tumor of greater than 25% or appearance of new areas of malignant disease. The full distribution is the outcome of interest, and the protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. Three-year estimates are provided as a summary of the distributions. Analysis was planned to occur after 309 deaths had been reported.
Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule from end of treatment: 6-8 weeks, every 3 mo. for 2 yr., then every 6 mo. for 3 yr., then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 6.5 years. Three-year rates are reported here.
Progression-free survival time is defined as time from randomization to relapse/progression in the primary site or regional nodes (event), distant metastasis (event), death (event), or last follow-up (censored). Progression is defined as an estimated increase in the size of the tumor of greater than 25% or appearance of new areas of malignant disease. The full distribution is the outcome of interest, and the protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. Three-year estimates are provided as a summary of the distributions. Analysis was planned to occur after 309 deaths had been reported.
Time frame: From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule from end of treatment: 6-8 weeks, every 3 mo. for 2 yr., then every 6 mo. for 3 yr., then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 6.5 years.
Acute radiation therapy toxicities (within 90 days from start of radiation therapy) and systemic effects at any time were scored using Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) version 2.0. Late RT toxicities (> 90 days from start of radiation therapy) were scored by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG)/European Organisation for. Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) criteria. Both criteria grades toxicity severity from 1=mild to 5=death. Summary data is provided in this outcome measure; see Adverse Events Module for specific adverse event/toxicity data.
Time frame: Baseline (pretreatment), sometime during the last two weeks of treatment, three months from start of treatment, and one year from start of treatment.
The PSS-HN is a clinician-rated evaluation conducted as an unstructured interview format that assesses three functions: Normalcy of Diet (this outcome measure), Public Eating, and Understandability of Speech. Each function is scored from 0 to 100 and analyzed separately. Higher scores indicate better performance status. Treatment effect was analyzed as time-weighted average between baseline (pre-treatment) and one year calculated by use of area under the curve (AUC).
Time frame: Baseline (pretreatment), sometime during the last two weeks of treatment, three months from start of treatment, and one year from start of treatment.
The Performance Status Scale for Head and Neck Cancer (PSS-HN) is a clinician-rated evaluation conducted as an unstructured interview format that assesses three functions: Normalcy of Diet , Public Eating (this outcome measure), and Understandability of Speech. Each function is scored from 0 to 100 and analyzed separately. Higher scores indicate better performance status. Treatment effect was analyzed as time-weighted average between baseline (pretreatment) and one year calculated by use of area under the curve (AUC).
Time frame: Baseline (pretreatment), sometime during the last two weeks of treatment, three months from start of treatment, and one year from start of treatment.
The Performance Status Scale for Head and Neck Cancer (PSS-HN) is a clinician-rated evaluation conducted as an unstructured interview format that assesses three functions: Normalcy of Diet , Public Eating, and Understandability of Speech (this outcome measure). Each function is scored from 0 to 100 and analyzed separately. Higher scores indicate better performance status. Treatment effect was analyzed as time-weighted average between baseline (pretreatment) and one year calculated by use of area under the curve (AUC).
Time frame: Baseline (pretreatment), sometime during the last two weeks of treatment, three months from start of treatment, and one year from start of treatment.
The HNRQ is a patient-reported questionnaire administrated through a paper format; it measures radiation-related side effects and the overall well-being of head and neck cancer patients in the past week. The overall score is the mean of the 22 questions, with a range of 1 to 7. Higher scores indicate better quality of life. Treatment effect was analyzed as time-weighted average between baseline (pre-treatment) and 1 year calculated by use of area under the curve (AUC).
Time frame: From randomization to date of death or last follow-up
Time frame: From randomization to date of death or last follow-up
Radiation Therapy Oncology Group
Network
A Phase III Trial of Concurrent Radiation and Chemotherapy for Advanced Head and Neck Carcinomas
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT00076310
Carcinoma, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
Houston, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01302834
Carcinoma, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02308072
Carcinoma, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
London, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT03336606
Carcinoma, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
Portland, Oregon, United States
View Trial Details