Characterization of Transient Alterations of Cutaneous Sensory Nerve Function by Cryolipolysis

Study design We undertook an open-label, prospective study at the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) (Boston, USA) between December 2012 and July 2013. The study was approved by the MGH Institutional Research Board and was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01673113). Written, informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to participation in the study. The study conformed to the standards set by the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Eleven healthy subjects were enrolled in the study. They were randomized to have either the left or right flank treated with a single cycle of cryolipolysis. Baseline measurement of sensory function was evaluated using QST at the treated and control (untreated) flank for each subject. Histamine iontophoresis was used to evaluate itch duration and intensity on the treated and control flank for each subject. All sensory function testing, including responses to histamine-induced itch, were assessed at 48-72 hours, and Day 7, 14, 21, 35 and 56 post-treatment. In 6 subjects, skin biopsies (3 mm diameter) for histological analysis of nerve fiber density at the treated flank were taken at baseline, 48-72 hours, Day 21 and 56 post-treatment.

Cryolipolysis procedure All subjects received cryolipolysis treatment to the flank above the iliac crest, on one side of the body. The untreated (contralateral) flank served as the control throughout the study. Subjects were randomized to have right or left flank treated and randomization was achieved with a computer-generated randomization code. The treatment site was identified, assessed and marked by a single, unblinded investigator. The sensory testing site within the flanks was marked and registered using a transparent plastic sheet, aligned using cutaneous landmarks including nevi or scars, and photographed with the subject in a standard position, to ensure that the same area was tested on follow-up visits.

Cryolipolysis was performed using an EzApp6.3 applicator (CoolScultping, Zeltiq Aesthetics Inc, Pleasanton USA) and standard settings at cooling intensity factor (CIF) of 41.6, corresponding to heat transfer of -73mW/cm2, applied for one hour.

Quantitative sensory testing (QST) The QST protocol consisted of a series of 7 sensory tests. The QST procedure started with the evaluation of mechanical followed by thermal thresholds.

Inclusion criteria

• Subjects ages 18-65 years old, male or female with visible adiposity on the flanks (love handles) and no weight changes exceeding 10lb during the preceding month.
• Willingness to participate in the study
• Informed consent agreement signed by the subject
• Willingness to follow the treatment schedule and post treatment care requirements
• Willingness to have skin biopsy done
• No history of allergy to lidocaine or any other anesthetics.

Exclusion criteria

• Subject has a history of nerve problems, neuropathy
• Subject who has recently undergone liposuction or another weight loss procedure, had a history of subcutaneous injections into the area of intended treatment within the preceding 6 months.
• Subjects with history of diabetes
• Subjects with a BMI of 30 or greater
• Subject has an infection, surgical scars or other dermatologic condition in the area to be treated
• Subject has known cold sensitivity disorders including Raynaud's phenomena, cold urticaria, cryoglobulinemia, or cold induced hemoglobinuria
• Women who are pregnant or intending to become pregnant in the following 9 months; women who are lactating or had been lactating in the prior 9 months.
• Subject is immunosuppressed
• Subject is unable to comply with treatment, home care or follow-up visits
• Subject has a history of vitiligo
• Subject has a history of keloid formation
• Subject is currently enrolled in a clinical study of any other unapproved investigational drug or device.
• Any other condition or laboratory value that would, in the professional opinion of the investigator, potentially affect the subject's response or the integrity of the data or would pose an unacceptable risk to the subject.
• Subject taking anticoagulants