NCT Number: NCT05994404
Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy - Cost Observational Surgical Trial
The purpose of the study is to determine the cost-effectiveness of different surgical strategies to treat cervical spondylotic myelopathy. The study will use data generated from the CSM-S Trial (NCT02076113).
1. To determine if laminoplasty is more cost-effective compared to dorsal fusion or ventral fusion surgery. 2. To determine the relative cost-effectiveness between anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), posterior instrumented cervical fusion (PCF), and cervical laminoplasty.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeKey information
Conditions
Age range
45 year–80 year
Sex eligibility
All sexes
Study type
Observational
Primary location
Lahey Hospital & Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts, United States
About this study
In this study, the investigators aim to cover a significant gap in the literature, namely, to compare anterior and posterior surgical approaches for the management of CSM on the cost of care. The investigators will conduct a post-hoc analysis of data from the randomized trial "Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Surgical Trial" (www.ClinicalTrials.gov; identifier: NCT02076113). This trial was conducted in collaboration between multiple academic institutions in North America. The results of the CSM-S RCT in terms of clinical and patient-reported outcomes suggested similar effectiveness with anterior and posterior surgical approaches. Notably, the study showed that cervical laminoplasty, a relatively low instrumentation-related cost procedure, was effective in managing CSM. The findings of the analysis proposed herein will add a new dimension to clinical decision-making by informing patient selection and improving the quality of care.
Post-hoc analysis will be conducted on the following data that were collected during the trial.
I. Functional outcomes determined by well-known quantitative scales (SF-36, Oswestry Neck, mJOA, and EuroQol-5D) at pre-op, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, and 5 years.
II. Health resource utilization information was collected using patient diaries along with copies of all medical bills and receipts at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months post-operatively for all patients. Participants were asked to monitor days missed from work and days unable to perform usual activities, in addition to days missed from work for medical treatments or evaluations.
The overall cost will be estimated for each patient from a societal perspective and will include the following components:
I. Index Hospitalization Cost - performed on all patients:
- Hospital Costs: Total hospital charges (TotalHC) will be used to estimate costs using hospital-specific and year-specific Medicare cost-to-charge ratios (CCR). The costs will be adjusted for inflation to the latest year of the study (2018) without a 3% discount. - Assumptions: cost-to-charge ratios for all hospitals and all relevant years will be provided. Data will be complete for all patients from all sites.
o As a sub-analysis, hospital charges for specific revenue centers (i.e., radiology, pharmacy, physiotherapy, and occupational therapy) will be converted to costs using hospital-specific and year-specific CCRs. This will allow the identification of the major drivers of the difference in cost between the surgical strategies. A crosswalk between the revenue center and the cost center will have to be created. - Assumptions: Total hospital charges will be segmented out into the relevant revenue centers. All patients will have charges segmented in this manner. No major differences in how total hospital charges will be segmented by each site will exist.
- For professional services (identified with either HCPCS code or CPT-4 codes) provided to patients during the index hospitalization, costs will be calculated using national reimbursement amounts from the appropriate Medicare fee schedules for the respective year. - Assumptions: Detailed line-item services of all HCPCS codes and CPT-4 codes (including any necessary billing modifiers) will be provided for all professional services. Data will be complete for all patients from all sites.
II. One-year All-Cause Cost - performed on patients from sites capturing 1 year utilization:
- One-year all-cause costs will be calculated on hospital and professional services in the manner described above. - Assumptions: The same underlying assumptions described above.
III. Time to Return to Work - performed on all patients reporting employment:
- Investigators will assume that the work halted for patients on the procedure date).
- For patients to whom this outcome applies, the investigators will compare different cohorts using return to work as a time-to-event outcome.
- Lost wages will be estimated using the median weekly earnings in the US as reported by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
- Patients providing no employment information will be assumed to have zero lost wages.
- Job-specific wages will not be estimated.
Index hospitalization costs and one-year all-cause costs will be combined with costs due to loss of productivity (indirect costs) to estimate total costs for each patient from a societal perspective. This will be performed on the subpopulation for which one-year costs were captured.
Who can participate
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
-Patients with Cervical Myelopathy (> or equal to 2 levels of spinal cord compression from C3 to C7) with 2 or more of the following symptoms/ signs: clumsy hands, gait disturbance, hyperreflexia, upgoing toes, bladder dysfunction.
Exclusion criteria
- C2-C7 kyphosis>5 degrees (measured in standing extension radiograph)
- segmental kyphotic deformity (defined by greater than 3 osteophytes extending dorsal to a C2-C7 dorsal-caudal line measured on cervical spine CT)
- structurally significant ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL - measured on cervical spine CT)
- previous cervical spine surgery, or significant active health-related co-morbidity (Anesthesia Class IV or higher)
Treatment and study plan
Posterior Cervical Fusion
ProcedureCervical Laminoplasty
ProcedurePrimary outcomes
-
Total Health Costs - Societal Perspective
Time frame: 5 years
Index hospitalization costs+one-year all cause costs+loss of productivity costs
Secondary outcomes
-
Index Hospitalization Costs
Time frame: 30 days
Hospital Costs
-
1-Year all-cause health costs
Time frame: 1 year
All health costs over 1 year
-
Loss of productivity costs
Time frame: 5 years
Costs associated with loss of productivity from a societal perspective
Sponsors and collaborators
Lead sponsor
Lahey Clinic
Other
Collaborators
- Mayo Clinic
Registry information
Acronym: CSM-COST
Important dates
- Study start
- 2014
- Primary completion
- 2018
- Study completion
- 2019
- First posted
- Aug 16, 2023
- Registry last updated
- Aug 16, 2023
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Related clinical trials
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
Comparison Between C3-6 Laminoplasty and C3 Laminectomy With Cervical Laminoplasty
NCT05006495
Bone Diseases, Cervical Spondylosis With Myelopathy
Seoul, Korea, South Korea
View Trial DetailsDTI of the Brain and Cervical Spine: Evaluation in Normal Subjects and Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy
NCT01868958
Cervical Spondylosis With Myelopathy
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
View Trial DetailsHigh-Resolution Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) of the Cervical Spinal Cord in the Setting of Spinal Cord Injury (SCI)
NCT01407705
Central Nervous System Diseases, Cervical Spondylosis With Myelopathy
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
View Trial DetailsMulti-centre Study to Evaluate ACAF Versus Laminoplasty in Treating Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament
NCT04968028
Bone Diseases, Cervical Spondylosis With Myelopathy
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial Details