Oslo University Hospital
Oslo, 0424, Norway
NCT Number: NCT03674619
The primary aim of the present project is to compare the effectiveness of surgery and nonsurgical treatment in patients with cervical radiculopathy caused by either disc herniation or spondylosis. Secondary aims are to evaluate cost-effectiveness and predicting factors of success of the two treatments, and to explore the terms success rate and expectations by asking the patients to fill in their expected primary outcome score at baseline.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
20 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Oslo, 0424, Norway
Cervical radiculopathy is usually caused by disc herniation or spondylosis. Prognosis is expected to be good in most patients but there is limited scientific evidence about the indication for non-surgical and surgical treatment.
Two randomised controlled trials comparing cervical decompression and non-operative treatment with cost-effectiveness analysis and assessment of expectations and predictors of outcome. The main research question will be evaluated at one-year follow-up.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Anterior discectomy will be performed and a microscope is used. After separation of the platysma muscle the pre-vertebral space is reached by an approach medial to the sternocleido-mastoid muscle and the carotid artery and lateral to the trachea and oesophagus. Then the disc is incided and the corpora are distracted to perform discectomy. Usually the posterior ligament is cut and the spinal root is decompressed and if necessary the arthritic rims are removed. An inter-vertebral fusion device is inserted, two levels are allowed in the spondylosis study.
Patients will first attend an experienced specialist in physical medicine and rehabilitation who will answer concerns and questions and if necessary repeat the information given before inclusion. The aim of the brief intervention is to promote better understanding and coping of the condition. The intervention will include supervision by a physiotherapist (6 sessions altogether) and provide advice on how to handle secondary neck muscle pain and dysfunction, reduce eventual fear avoidance, and advice to stay active.
Time frame: Follow-up at 52 weeks is the primary end point.
Consists of ten questions about pain related disability and include items such as by example headache, concentration, reading and sleep. Each item is rated by choosing one of five response categories and transformed to a total score from 0 to 100 (worst possible). The Norwegian version has been validated in patients with neck pain and with cervical radiculopathy.
Time frame: 52 weeks
Neck pain measured by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) from 0 (no pain to 10 (worst imaginable pain).
Time frame: 52 weeks
EQ-5D-5L includes five domains: mobility; self-care, daily activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression and each has three response categories. The responses are transformed into and index to value the patients' health related quality of life for the cost utility analyses. Patients score their health from 0 (as bad as possible) to 100 (best possible) by EQ-VAS. The Norwegian version has been validated in patients with back pain, idiopathic scoliosis, and cervical radiculopathy.
Time frame: 52 weeks
Evaluated with the Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire
Time frame: 52 weeks
Assessed by the 10-question version of the Hopkins Symptom Check List
Time frame: 52 weeks
Perceived recovery or change of the main symptom rated on a numeric scale ranging from -9 (worst possible change) to 9 (best possible change)
Time frame: 52 weeks
Sickness absence data will be collected from the National Social Security Institution for the year before and after inclusion.
Time frame: 52 weeks
As recorded by The Dysphagia Short Questionnaire
Time frame: 52 weeks
Questions related to pain medication usage.
Time frame: At inclusion
Exploring patient expectations ahead of treatment. The patients are asked to fill out the Neck Disability Index pretending they are at 52 weeks post treatment and selecting the lowest category they would be content with for each item. The patients are also asked to report what they expect their symptoms to be like 52 weeks ahead (ranging from much worse to much better), registered for arm pain, neck pain and headache separately.
Time frame: 52 weeks
Exploring global success rate by asking the patients about how the arm pain and neck pain is compared to prior to treatment (ranging from much worse to much better).
Time frame: 52 weeks
Arm pain measured by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) from 0 (no pain to 10 (worst imaginable pain).
Oslo University Hospital
Other
A Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing the Effectiveness of Surgical and Nonsurgical Treatment for Cervical Radiculopathy
Acronym: CRT
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07628439
Cervical Radiculopathy, Nervous System Diseases
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT07447271
Cervical Radiculopathy, Nervous System Diseases
Yangsan, Gyeongsangnam-do, South Korea
View Trial DetailsNCT03959098
Bone Diseases, Cervical Radiculopathy
Seoul, South Korea
View Trial DetailsNCT04122248
Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease, Cervical Disc Herniation
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial Details