José Ríos-Díaz
Madrid, 28036, Spain
NCT Number: NCT04299672
BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal alterations of the cervical region constitute clinical situations with a high prevalence that may be related to posture mismatches. Static alterations not linked to a defined pathological picture may come from a sensory-motor disorder whose main manifestations are increased muscle tone and stiffness. Postural reconstruction (RP). The RP method has as main objective the rebalancing of the muscular tone from 1) the sensorimotor recovery and 2) the re-functionalization of the subcortical toninergic centers. The aim of this study is to determine the effect of this physiotherapeutic approach on the functionality and posture of the cervical region.
OBJECTIVES: 1) to know the effect of PR on cervical function in subjects with impaired cervical motor function; and 2) to know the effect of PR on static in subjects with impaired cervical motor function.
PARTICIPANTS & METHODS: quasi-experimental design, with only one intervention group (N=40). Data records before and after the 1st intervention, before the 2nd, 4th and 6th weekly treatment sessions, at 15 days and a month and at 3 months after the end of treatment.
INTERVENTION: The intervention will consist of the application of a RP maneuver applied to both lower limbs to obtain improvements in the cranio-cervical region.
OUTCOMES: The outcome variables will collect information on active joint movement in the cervical region, anatomical references representative of body statics, cervical repositioning, cervical disability, pain and time to extinction of the effect.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–45 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Madrid, 28036, Spain
SAMPLE: People between 18-45 years old and with 1) alteration of active cervical mobility in at least one of the six directions of analytic movement compared to normality or with alteration of motor control of the cervical region in at least one of the 7 tests included in the study compared to normal criteria.
SAMPLE SIZE: The minimum size required has been calculated using the program G*Power 3.1.3 for Windows (University Kiel, Germany, 2008) based on an effect size of 0.5, type I error of 5%,type II error of 10%, an effect size of delta=0.20, a intra-measures correlation =0.5 for 7 measurement points. An extra 20% for drop-outs was added. The final sample size is N=40.
INTERVENTION:
Maximum external rotation of the hip in lower limb elevation and the dorsal flexion of the ankle with flexion of the toes, performed in both lower limbs alternately and independently. During the performance of the technique, the patient must implement the work breathing learned in the first basal assessment session.
It will be applied weekly during 6 consecutive weeks.
DATA ANALYSIS:
The percentages of change from the baseline values in the intragroup comparison shall be calculated. The effect size will be estimated with the Hedges' g statistic.
The significance level will be set to p<0.05 and calculations will be performed with jmv r package for R (R Core Team, 2019. R: A language and environment for statistical. computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL http://www.R-project.org/)
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Interventions are described in group descriptions
Time frame: Pre-intervention, immediately after first intervention, post-2nd-intervention(2 weeks), post-4th-intervention (4 weeks), post-6th-intervention (6 weeks) and follow-up at 15 days, 30 days and 3 months
The craniovertebral angle is defined as the angle between the line from the external auditory meatus to the seventh cervical vertebra and a horizontal line at the level of the seventh cervical vertebra. The measure will be carried out with the KINOVEA system in degrees.
Time frame: Pre-intervention, immediately after first intervention, post-2nd-intervention(2 weeks), post-4th-intervention (4 weeks), post-6th-intervention (6 weeks) and follow-up at 15 days, 30 days and 3 months
The Sternum-mentonian distance is the distance between the distal end of the mentonand the proximal end of the sternal notch. The measure will be carried out with the KINOVEA system in centimeters.
Time frame: Pre-intervention, immediately after first intervention, post-2nd-intervention(2 weeks), post-4th-intervention (4 weeks), post-6th-intervention (6 weeks) and follow-up at 15 days, 30 days and 3 months
Head-neck asymmetry in the frontal plane is the deviation of the fronto-naso-mentonian line from the vertical line of the body axis. The measure will be carried out with the KINOVEA system in centimeters.
Time frame: Pre-intervention, immediately after first intervention, post-2nd-intervention(2 weeks), post-4th-intervention (4 weeks), post-6th-intervention (6 weeks) and follow-up at 15 days, 30 days and 3 months
Displacement of the center of masses by means of a Dinascan/IBV dynamometer platform with NedSVE/IB balance evaluation system.
Time frame: Pre-intervention, immediately after first intervention, post-2nd-intervention(2 weeks), post-4th-intervention (4 weeks), post-6th-intervention (6 weeks) and follow-up at 15 days, 30 days and 3 months
Upper cervical active rotation on 4 supports. The correct movement pattern implies that the patient is able to dissociate the upper rotation movement.
Time frame: Pre-intervention, immediately after first intervention, post-2nd-intervention(2 weeks), post-4th-intervention (4 weeks), post-6th-intervention (6 weeks) and follow-up at 15 days, 30 days and 3 months
Upper cervical active flexion on 4 supports. The correct movement pattern implies that the sagittal movement axis is correct and balanced. The normal bending movement must be "clean" and regular in the upper and lower cervical area, almost touching the sternum
Time frame: Pre-intervention, immediately after first intervention, post-2nd-intervention(2 weeks), post-4th-intervention (4 weeks), post-6th-intervention (6 weeks) and follow-up at 15 days, 30 days and 3 months
Active cervical extension in seating. The correct pattern should be smooth and uniform top, middle, bottom. NO HINGES. The face line stays about 15 - 20º from the horizontal.
Time frame: Pre-intervention, immediately after first intervention, post-2nd-intervention(2 weeks), post-4th-intervention (4 weeks), post-6th-intervention (6 weeks) and follow-up at 15 days, 30 days and 3 months
Return to the neutral position from the active cervical extension position when seated. The correct pattern is soft starting with the cranio-cervical area and continuing with the rest of the cervical spine.
Time frame: Pre-intervention, immediately after first intervention, post-2nd-intervention(2 weeks), post-4th-intervention (4 weeks), post-6th-intervention (6 weeks) and follow-up at 15 days, 30 days and 3 months
Active bilateral bending of both upper limbs in standing position. The cervical spine should remain static during the 180º of bilateral upper limb elevation.
Time frame: Pre-intervention, immediately after first intervention, post-2nd-intervention(2 weeks), post-4th-intervention (4 weeks), post-6th-intervention (6 weeks) and follow-up at 15 days, 30 days and 3 months
Active unilateral bending of both upper limbs in standing position. The cervical spine should remain static during the 180º of unilateral upper limb elevation.
Time frame: Pre-intervention, immediately post-intervention, 2nd, 4th, 6th intervention, 15, 30 days post-intervention and 3 months post-intervention
During the sitting gesture on the heels the cervical spine should be static.
Time frame: Pre-intervention, immediately after first intervention, post-2nd-intervention(2 weeks), post-4th-intervention (4 weeks), post-6th-intervention (6 weeks) and follow-up at 15 days, 30 days and 3 months
Neck disability Index. The NDI is a modification of the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Index . It is a patient-completed, condition-specific functional status questionnaire with 10 items including pain, personal care, lifting, reading, headaches, concentration, work, driving, sleeping and recreation with a range from 0 (no activity limitations) to 50 (complete activity limitation)
Time frame: Pre-intervention, immediately after first intervention, post-2nd-intervention(2 weeks), post-4th-intervention (4 weeks), post-6th-intervention (6 weeks) and follow-up at 15 days, 30 days and 3 months
Numeric Pain Rating Scale in a range from 0 (no pain) to 100 (maximum pain).
Time frame: Pre-intervention, immediately after first intervention, post-2nd-intervention(2 weeks), post-4th-intervention (4 weeks), post-6th-intervention (6 weeks) and follow-up at 15 days, 30 days and 3 months
Cervical flexion with goniometry (in degrees)
Time frame: Pre-intervention, immediately after first intervention, post-2nd-intervention(2 weeks), post-4th-intervention (4 weeks), post-6th-intervention (6 weeks) and follow-up at 15 days, 30 days and 3 months
Cervical extension with goniometry (in degrees)
Time frame: Pre-intervention, immediately after first intervention, post-2nd-intervention(2 weeks), post-4th-intervention (4 weeks), post-6th-intervention (6 weeks) and follow-up at 15 days, 30 days and 3 months
Cervical inclination bilaterally with goniometry (in degrees).
Time frame: Pre-intervention, immediately after first intervention, post-2nd-intervention(2 weeks), post-4th-intervention (4 weeks), post-6th-intervention (6 weeks) and follow-up at 15 days, 30 days and 3 months
Cervical rotation bilaterally with goniometry (in degrees).
Universidad Antonio de Nebrija
Other
Effect of Postural Reconstruction on the Functionality of the Cervical Region
Acronym: CERFUPOS
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07738783
Muscular Diseases, Musculoskeletal Diseases
Kocaeli, Derince, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07722676
Neck Pain, Neurologic Manifestations
Fort Myers, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06503562
Chronic Pain Syndrome, Neck Pain
Istanbul, Turkey, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07292350
Back Pain, Neck Pain
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details