Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100730, China
NCT Number: NCT03163758
The study aimed to figure out brain structural and functional reorganization evidence after repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation through the method of neuroimaging brain network analysis, such as resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion tensor imaging.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me35 year–80 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100730, China
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The rTMS treatments were performed using a Medtronic MagPro type magnetic stimulation device (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) and a figure-of-eight coil (MC-B70, Medtronic). Coils were placed tangent to the scalp. The stimulation protocol involved 50 trains of 20 pulses applied over the ipsilesional M1 at a frequency of 5 HZ, with the stimulus intensity set at 120% of the resting motor threshold of the unaffected extremity.
The sham rTMS was performed on the same site as the rTMS treatment group but without any true stimulations. Coils were placed perpendicular to the scalp.
Time frame: Change from Baseline NIHSS at 1 month after real rTMS/sham rTMS
The investigators use National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) to evaluate the participants' neural deficit after stroke. The NIHSS is composed of 11 items, each of which scores a specific ability between a 0 and 4. For each item, a score of 0 typically indicates normal function in that specific ability, while a higher score is indicative of some level of impairment. The individual scores from each item are summed in order to calculate a patient's total NIHSS score. The maximum possible score is 42, with the minimum score being a 0. Higher NIHSS scores mean a worse outcome.
Time frame: Change from Baseline BI at 1 month after real rTMS/sham rTMS
The investigators use Barthel Index (BI) to evaluate the participants' activities of daily living after stroke. The BI consists of 10 questions that relate to degree of independence with activities of daily living, including toileting, bathing, eating, dressing, continence, transfers, and ambulation. The BI score is calculated by summing the response value to each of the 10 questions. The BI score ranges from 0 to 100. A patient scoring 0 points would be dependent in all assessed activities of daily living, whereas a score of 100 would reflect independence in these activities. A higher score is associated with a better outcome.
Time frame: Change from Baseline FMA at 1 month after real rTMS/sham rTMS
The investigators use Fugl-Meyer assessment Upper Limb (FMA-UL) to evaluate the participants' motor function of upper limb. The FMA-UL is an ordinal scale that has 3 points for each item. A zero score is given for the item if the subject cannot do the task. A score of 1 is given when the task is performed partially and a score of 2 is given when the task is performed fully. The maximum score of FMA-UL is 66 and the minimum score is 0. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Time frame: Change from Baseline z-FC maps at 1 month after real rTMS/sham rTMS
Functional Connectivity was examined using a seed-based voxel-wise correlation approach. The ipsilesional primary motor cortex (M1) was defined as the region of interest. Pearson's correlation analysis between the time course of the ipsilesional M1 and that of every voxel in the whole brain was computed for a map of correlation coefficients, which were Fisher's z-transformed and called as z-FC maps.
Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Other
Study of Cerebral Structural and Functional Reorganization of Stroke Patients After Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) Using the Method of Neuroimaging Brain Network Analysis
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04992195
Alzheimer Disease, Arterial Thromboembolism
Hong Kong
View Trial DetailsNCT06317194
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases
Berkeley, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07208422
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases
Kano, Kano State, Nigeria
View Trial DetailsNCT04042584
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases
Bordeaux, France
View Trial Details